Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania

Bird communities of different woody vegetation types from the Niraj Valley, Romania

In this paper, the bird assemblages of different woody vegetation types are presented in a human-modified Eastern European landscape. The studied territory is part of a Special Protection Area for bird species. The following sampling areas were included in the study: hornbeam beech, oak hornbeam, and sessile oak forests; thickets of willow; forests of white willow; scrubs of blackthorn and hawthorn; and orchards. Birds were grouped in a community typical of deciduous forests and in another community typical of coppices and scrubs. Bird species number, alpha diversity, and abundance were significantly higher in the Salici Populetum association and in orchards than in the other plant associations. The value of beta diversity was highest in the Carpino Quercetum petraeae association. The lowest spatial heterogeneity and equitability were in the Salicetum triandrae association. The Salici Populetum association had the highest number of characteristic species. The analysis of the ecological structure of the bird communities showed that forests and orchards are more abundant in species associated with closed forest habitats than other plant associations. It can be concluded that orchards have a bird community influenced by the forest habitats. Along with forests, orchards are valuable habitats for bird species requiring designation of protected areas and species of national interest.

___

  • Agger P, Brandt J (1988). Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 1: 227-240.
  • Angelici C, Brunelli M, Battisti C (2012). Breeding birds in agro-forest habitat types (Nazzano, Tevere-Farfa Nature Reserve, central Italy): evidencing patterns following a dominance/diversity approach. Avocetta 36: 97-102.
  • Bailey D, Schmidt-Entling MH, Eberhart P, Herrmann JD, Hofer G, Kormann U, Herzog F (2010). Effects of habitat amount and isolation on biodiversity in fragmented traditional orchards. J Appl Ecol 47: 1003-1013.
  • Baláž M, Balážová M (2012). Diversity and abundance of bird communities in three mountain forest stands: effect of the habitat heterogeneity. Pol J Ecol 60: 629-634.
  • Baldock D, Beaufoy G, Bennett G, Clark J (1993). Nature Conservation and New Directions in the Common Agricultural Policy. London, UK: IEEP.
  • Batáry P, Fronczek S, Normann C, Scherber C, Tscharntke T (2014). How do edge effect and tree species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany’s largest deciduous forest? Forest Ecol Manag 319: 44-50.
  • Beaufoy G, Baldock D, Clark J (1994). The Nature of Farming: Low Intensity Farming Systems in Nine European Countries. London, UK: IEEP.
  • Bennett AF (1990). Land use, forest fragmentation and the mammalian fauna at Naringal, south-western Victoria. Aust Wildlife Res 17: 325-347.
  • Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006). Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biol Conserv 133: 250-264.
  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18: 182-188.
  • Bergner A, Avcı M, Eryiğit H, Jansson N, Niklasson M, Westerberg L, Milberg P (2015). Influences of forest type and habitat structure on bird assemblages of oak (Quercus spp.) and pine (Pinus spp.) stands in southwestern Turkey. Forest Ecol Manag 336: 137-147.
  • Bibby CJ (2004). Bird diversity survey methods. In: Sutherland JW, Newton I, Green RE, editors. Bird Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-17.
  • Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000). Bird Census Techniques. Vol. 2. London, UK: Academic Press.Bignal EM, McCracken DI (2000). The nature conservation value of European traditional farming systems. Environ Rev 8: 149-171.
  • Brown MW, Welker WV (1992). Development of the phytophagous arthropod community on apple as affected by orchard management. Environ Entomol 31: 485-492.
  • Cooper T, Arblaster K, Baldock D, Farmer M, Beaufoy G, Jones G, Poux X, McCracken D, Bignal E, Elbersen B et al. (2007). Final Report for the Study on HNV Indicators for Evaluation. London, UK: IEEP.
  • Domokos E (2013). The ecological characterization of the forestry associations from the middle stream of the Niraj Valley (Romania, Mureş County). Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii “Al. I. Cuza” din Iaşi (serie nouă), Secţiunea II a. Biologie vegetală 59: 99-106.
  • Domokos E, Cristea V (2013). The woody vegetation in the middle stream of the Niraj Valley (Romania, Mureş County). J Plant Develop 20: 149-162.
  • Domokos E, Cristea V (2014). Effects of managed forests structure on woodpeckers (Picidae) in the Niraj valley (Romania): woodpecker populations in managed forests. North-West J Zool 10: 110-117.
  • Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997). Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345-366.
  • Fagan WF, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999). How habitat edges change species interactions. Am Nat 153: 165-182.
  • Flack JAD (1976). Bird Populations of Aspen Forests in Western North America, Ornithological Monographs 19. American Ornithologists’ Union. Lawrence, KS, USA: Allen Press.
  • Fulco E, Florenzo GT (2008). Composizione e struttura della comunità ornitica nidificante in una fagetta della Basilicata. Avocetta 32: 55-60 (in Italian).
  • Fuller RJ (1995). Bird Life of Woodland and Forest. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gabbe AP, Robinson SK, Brawn JD (2002). Tree species preferences of foraging insectivorous birds: implications for floodplain forest restoration. Conserv Biol 16: 462-470.
  • Herzog F (1998). Streuobst: a traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe. Agroforest Syst 42: 61-80.
  • Hewson CM, Austin GE, Gough SJ, Fuller RJ (2011). Species-specific responses of woodland birds to stand-level habitat characteristics: the dual importance of forest structure and floristics. Forest Ecol Manag 261: 1224-1240.
  • Ikin K, Barton P, Stirnemann IA, Stein JR, Michael D, Crane M, Okada S, Lindenmayer DB (2014). Multi-scale associations between vegetation cover and woodland bird communities across a large agricultural region. PLoS One 9: e97029.
  • Johnson M, Reich P, MacNally R (2007). Bird assemblages of a fragmented agricultural landscape and the relative importance of vegetation structure and landscape pattern. Wildlife Res 34: 185-193.
  • Kelemen A (1978). Madaraskönyv. Bucharest, Romania: Kriterion (in Romanian).Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ (2003). Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J Animal Ecol 72: 367-382.
  • Kozár F (1992). Organization of arthropod communities in agroecosystems. Acta Phytopathol Hun 27: 365-373.
  • Krebs JR, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB, Siriwardena GM (1999). The second silent spring? Nature 400: 611-612.
  • Luck GW, Daily GC (2003). Tropical countryside bird assemblages: richness, composition and foraging differ by landscape context. Ecol Appl 13: 235-247.
  • MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW, Preer J (1962). On bird species diversity. II. Prediction of bird census from habitat measurements. Am Nat 96: 167-174.
  • Magurran A (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • McCollin D (1998): Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. Ecography 21: 247-260.
  • Mikusiński G, Gromadzki M, Chylarecki P (2001). Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conserv Biol 15: 208-217.
  • Myczko Ł, Rosin MZ, Skórka P, Wylegała P, Tobolka M, Fliszkiewicz M, Tadeusz M, Tryjanowski P (2013). Effects of management intensity and orchard features on bird communities in winter. Ecol Res 28: 503-512.
  • Roberts DW, Oksanen J (2006). LabDSV: Laboratory for Dynamic Synthetic Vegephenomenology. R Package Version 1-2. Bozeman, MT, USA: Montana State University.
  • Rodewald AD, Abrams MD (2002). Floristics and avian community structure: implications for regional changes in eastern forest composition. Forest Sci 48: 267-272.
  • Šálek M, Svobodová J, Zasadil P (2010). Edge effect of low-traffic forest roads on bird communities in secondary production forests in central Europe. Landscape Ecol 25: 1113-1124.
  • Sisk TD, Battin J (2002). Habitat edges and avian ecology: geographic patterns and insights for western landscapes. Stud Avian Biol 25: 30-48.
  • Török V (2008). Szentháromság tornya, jaj de messzire látszik. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: AMM Kiadó (in Hungarian).
  • Tryjanowski P, Hartel T, Báldi B, Szymański P, Tobolka M, Herzon I, Goławski A, Konvička M, Hromada M, Jerzak L et al. (2011). Can research in Western Europe identify the fate of farmland bird biodiversity in Eastern Europe? Acta Ornithol 46: 79-90.
  • Turček FJ (1956). Zur Frage der Dominanze in Vogelpopulationen. Waldhygiene 8: 249-257 (in German).