Presence of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes throughout the digestive tract of sheep

Presence of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes throughout the digestive tract of sheep

The activity of enzymes that digest carbohydrates at various points in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep was examined. In addition, weight and contents of digestive tract segments were examined. The experiment was performed on six adult ewes fed an 85% hay diet. The morphometric measurements revealed that the alimentary tract constituted 32% of the sheep s body mass and wet rumen contents constituted 70% of wet mass of the total digestive tract content. The protozoal population in the rumen varied from 37.2 × 104 to 54.0 × 104/mL rumen fluid. In the examined samples, ciliates were identified as belonging to the familyOphryoscolecidae, genera Entodinium, Diplodinium, and Ophryoscolex, and family Isotrichidae, genera Isotricha and Dasytricha. Degradation of various carbohydrates by digesta revealed that the fastest digestion rate for plant cell wall carbohydrates and inulin occurred in the reticulum, whereas for starch and chitin, rates of digestion to reducing sugars were the highest in the small intestine. The pH and redox potential at various points in the digestive tract varied from 2.8 to 7.7 and from 72.1 to 289.2 mV, respectively.

___

  • 1. Hofmann RR. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 1989; 78: 443–457.
  • 2. Selinger LB, Forsberg CW, Cheng KJ. The rumen: a unique source of enzymes for enhancing livestock production. Anaerobe 1996; 2: 263–284.
  • 3. Williams AG. Metabolic activities of rumen protozoa. In: Nolan JV, Leng RA, Demeyer DI, editors. The Roles of Protozoa and Fungi in Ruminant Digestion. Armidale, Australia: Penambul Books; 1989. pp. 97–126.
  • 4. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 2005.
  • 5. Rinne M, Jaakkola S, Huhtanen P. Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets. 1. Organic matter digestion, rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1997; 67: 1–17.
  • 6. Huhtanen P, Khalili H. The effect of sucrose supplements on particle-associated carboxymethylcellulase (EC 3.2.1.4) and xylanase (EC 3.2.1. 8) activities in cattle given grass-silage-based diet. Br J Nutr 1992; 67: 245–255.
  • 7. Miller GL, Blum R, Glennon E, Byrton A. Measurement of carboxymethylcellulase activity. Analyt Biochem 1960; 2: 127–132.
  • 8. Shen CR, Chen YS, Yang CJ, Chen JK, Liu CL. Colloid chitin azure is a dispersible, low-cost substrate for chitinase measurements in a sensitive, fast, reproducible assay. J Biomol Screen 2010; 15: 213–217.
  • 9. Dogiel VA. Monographie der Familie Ophryoscolecidae. Archiv für Protistenkunde 1927; 59: 1–282 (in German).
  • 10. Miltko R, Pietrzak M, Bełżecki G, Wereszka K, Michałowski T, Hackstein JHP. Isolation and in vitro cultivation of the fibrolytic rumen ciliate Eremoplastron (Eudiplodinium) dilobum. Eur J Protistol 2015; 51: 109–117.
  • 11. Martyniuk E, Rzepecki R. Sheep husbandry in Poland - an outline. In: Gabiña D, editor. Strategies for Sheep and Goat Breeding. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM; 1995. pp. 121–131.
  • 12. Yıldırım A, Ulutaş Z, Ocak N, Şirin E, Aksoy Y. A study on gastrointestinal tract characteristics of ram lambs at the same weights from six Turkish sheep breeds. S Afr J Anim Sci 2014; 44: 90–96.
  • 13. Sekine J, Oura R, Miyazaki H, Okamoto M, Asahida Y. Effect of time after feeding on distribution of digesta in the gastro-intestinal tracts of sheep. Asian-Aus J Anim Sci 1991; 4: 99–102.
  • 14. Hecker JF, Grovum WL. Rates of passage of digesta and water absorption along the large intestines of sheep, cows and pigs. Aust J Biol Sci 1975; 28: 161–167.
  • 15. Wheeler WE, Noller CH. Gastrointestinal tract pH and starch in feces of ruminants. J Anim Sci 1977; 44: 131–135.
  • 16. Rezaeian M, Beakes GW, Parker DS. Distribution and estimation of anaerobic zoosporic fungi along the digestive tracts of sheep. Mycol Res 2004; 108: 1227–1233.
  • 17. Kowalik B, Skomiał J, Pająk JJ, Taciak M, Majewska M, Bełżecki G. Population of ciliates, rumen fermentation indicators and biochemical parameters of blood serum in heifers fed diets supplemented with yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) preparation. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2012; 30: 329–338.
  • 18. Kimura A, Sato S, Goto H, Yamagishi N, Okada K, Mizuguchi H, Ito K. Simultaneous estimation of the pH of rumen and reticulum fluids of cows using a radio-transmission pH-measurement system. J Vet Med Sci 2012; 74: 531–535.
  • 19. Duffield T, Plaizier JC, Fairfield A, Bagg R, Vessie G, Dick P, Wilson J, Aramini J, McBride B. Comparison of techniques for measurement of rumen pH in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 59–66.
  • 20. Afzalzadeh A, Hovell FD de B. Role of omasum in the control of feed intake and rumen digesta outflow. J Agric Sci Technol2002; 4: 37–50.
  • 21. Marounek M, Roubal P, Bartos S. The redox potential, rH and pH values in the gastrointestinal tract of small ruminants. Physiol Bohemoslov 1987; 36: 71–74.
  • 22. Baldwin RL, Emery RS. The oxidation-reduction potential of rumen contents. J Dairy Sci 1960; 43: 506–511.
  • 23. Jouany JP. Effects of diet on populations of rumen protozoa in relation to fiber digestion. In: Nolan JV, Leng RA, Demeyer DI, editors. The Roles of Protozoa and Fungi in Ruminant Digestion. Armidale, Australia: Penambul Books; 1989. pp. 59–74.
  • 24. Marcin A, Südekum KH. Nutritive defaunation of the rumen in steers with subsequent refaunation using a cryopreserved monoculture of Entodinium caudatum. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2009; 93: 44–51.
  • 25. Zeng Y, Zeng D, Zhang Y, Ni X, Tang Y, Zhu H, Wang H, Yin Z, Pan K, Jing B. Characterization of the cellulolytic bacteria communities along the gastrointestinal tract of Chinese Mongolian sheep by using PCR-DGGE and real-time PCR analysis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 31: 1103–1113.
  • 26. Miltko R, Kowalik B, Majewska M, Bełżecki G, Skomiał J. The influence of supplementing heifer diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on the activity of polysaccharidases in the rumen. J Anim Feed Sci 2015; 24: 260–264.
  • 27. Akin DE. Ultrastructure of rumen bacterial attachment to forage cell walls. Appl Environ Microbiol 1976; 31: 562–568.
  • 28. Peng S, Yin J, Liu X, Jia B, Chang Z, Lu H, Jiang N, Chen Q. First insights into the microbial diversity in the omasum and reticulum of bovine using Illumina sequencing. J Appl Genetics 2015; 56: 393–401.
  • 29. Simunek J, Skrivanová V, Hoza I, Brezina P, Marounek M. Ontogenesis of enzymatic activities in the gastrointestinal tract of young goats. Small Ruminant Res 1995; 17: 207–211.
  • 30. Atti N, Noziere P, Doreau M, Kayouli C, Bocquier F. Effects of underfeeding and refeeding on offals weight in the Barbary ewes. Small Ruminant Res 2000; 38: 37–43.