Sarra FARJALLAH, Nabil AMOR, Osama Badri MOHAMMED, Abdulaziz ALAGAILI, Lilia BAHRI-SFAR

Molecular characterization of the nematode Heterakis gallinarum (Ascaridida: Heterakidae) infecting domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Tunisia

Heterakis gallinarum is one of the most recurrently diagnosed nematodes within the gastrointestinal tract of galliform birds.In the present study, we investigated the genetic diversity of 96 H. gallinarum collected from free-range chickens from different localitiesin Tunisia. We assessed phylogeny and genetic variability using the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNAand the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. Haplotype and nucleotide diversities indicate that H. gallinarum is aspecies with extremely low genetic diversity. Based on the networks and phylogenetic trees, there was strong support for the absenceof significant geographical structuring among the H. gallinarum populations in different localities in Tunisia. Mismatch distributionsand neutrality tests of both genetic markers suggest that at least one expansion event occurred in the population demographic historyof H. gallinarum. Our data showed a lack of population structure using the pairwise fixation index (FST) and an extensive gene flow. Itindicated that the most likely major contributor to the low genetic diversity and gene flow is the movement of the parasitized birds; inother words, the frequency of the poultry trade considerably affects patterns of worm gene flow.

PDF

___

1. Brener B, Tortelly R, Menezes RC, Muniz-Pereira LC, Pinto RM. Prevalence and pathology of the nematode Heterakis gallinarum, the trematode Paratanaisia bragai, and the protozoan Histomonas meleagridis in the turkey, Meleagris gallopavo. Mem I OS CR 2006; 101: 677-681.
2. Lund EE, Chute AM and Myers SL. Performance in chickens and turkeys of chicken-adapted Heterakis gallinarum. J Helmintho 1970; 44: 97-106.
3. Bazh EK. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Heterakis gallinae from native chickens in Egypt. Parasitol Res 2013; 112: 3557-3560.
4. Das G, Abel H, Savas T, Sohnrey B, Gauly M. Egg production dynamics and fecundity of Heterakis gallinarum residing in different caecal environments of chickens induced by fibrerich diets. Vet Parasitol 2014; 205: 606-618.
5. Ben Slimane B. Prevalence of the gastro-intestinal parasites of domestic chicken Gallus domesticus Linnaeus, 1758 in Tunisia according to the agro-ecological zones. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 2016; 40: 774-778.
6. Hillis DM, Dixon MT. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol 1991; 66: 411-453.
7. Bredtmann CM, Krücken J, Murugaiyan J, Kuzmina T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Nematode species identification–Current status, challenges and future perspectives for cyathostomins. Front Cell Infect Mi 2017; 7: 283 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00283.
8. Zhou X, Xie Y, Zhang ZH, Wang CD, Sun Y, Gu XB, Wang SX. Analysis of the genetic diversity of the nematode parasite Baylisascaris schroederi from wild giant pandas in different mountain ranges in China. Parasite Vector 2013; 6: 233-241.
9. Gu X, Zhu JY, Jian KL, Wang BJ, Peng XR, Yang GY, Wang T, Zhong ZJ, Peng KY. Absence of population genetic structure in Heterakis gallinarum of chicken from Sichuan, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. Mitochondr DNA 2016; 27: 3612-3617.
10. Gu X, Zhu JY, Wang BJ, Zheng J Yang GY, Wang T, Lai WM. Genetic variation of Heterakis gallinarum in Sichuan based on the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1/2). Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica 2016; 47: 796-804.
11. Elliott T, Muller A, Brockwell Y, Murphy N, Grillo V, Toet H, Anderson G. Evidence for high genetic diversity of NAD1 and COX1 mitochondrial haplotypes among triclabendazole resistant and susceptible populations and field isolates of Fasciola hepatica (liver fluke) in Australia. Vet Parasitol 2014; 200: 90-96.
12. Sofi TA, Ahmad F, Sheikh BA. Morphology and prevalence of some helminth parasites in Gallus domesticus from Gurez Valley of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Journal of Fisheries and Livestock Production 2016; 4: 159.
13. Zhu X, Gasser RB, Podolska M, Chilton N. Characterization of anisakid nematodes with zoonotic potential by nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 1998; 28:1911-1921.
14. Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C. SeaView and Phylowin, two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci 1996; 12: 543-548.
15. Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press; 1987.
16. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 1451-1452.
17. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989; 123: 585-595.
18. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 1997; 147: 915-925.
19. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 2010; 10: 564-567.
20. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 2012; 29: 1695-1701.
21. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 772.
22. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst Biol 2012; 61: 539-542.
23. Stamatakis A. Raxml-vi-hpc: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 2688-2690.
24. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16: 37- 48.
25. Zhao GH, Li HM, Ryan UM, Cong MM, Hu B, Gao M, Ren WX, Wang XY, Zhang SP, Lin Q, et al. Phylogenetic study of Baylisascaris schroederi isolated from Qinling subspecies of giant panda in China based on combined nuclear 5.8S and the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) ribosomal DNA sequences. Parasitol Int 2012; 61: 497-500.
26. Posedi J, Drogemuller M, Schnieder T, Hoglund J, Lichtenfels JR, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Microchip capillary electrophoresis-based genetic comparison of closely related cyathostomin nematode parasites of horses using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain. Parasitol Res 2004; 92: 421-429.
27. Lin Q, Li HM, Gao M, Wang XY, Ren WX, Cong MM, Tan XC, Chen CX, Yu SK, Zhao GH. Characterization of Baylisascaris schroederi from Qinling subspecies of giant panda in China by the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Parasitol Res 2012; 110: 1297-1303.
28. Grant WS, Bowen BW. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J Hered 1998; 89: 415-426.
29. Prugnolle F, Théron A, Pointier JP, Jabbour-Zahab R, Jarne P, Durand P, De Meeûs T. Dispersal in a parasitic worm and its two hosts: consequence for local adaptation. Evolution 2005; 59: 296-303.
30. Louhi KR, Karvonen A, Rellstab C, Jokela J. Is the population genetic structure of complex life cycle parasites determined by the geographic range of the most motile host? Infect Genet Evol 2010; 10: 1271-1277.