Immunoblot Analysis of Campylobacters of Chickens

The aim of this study was to determine immunogenic structures by immunoblotting in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from chickens. The bands obtained from C. jejuni strains were found to be distributed between 10.8 and 116.5 kD by SDS-PAGE analysis of whole cell proteins. The bands 78, 63, 52, 48.5, 43.5, 29.8, 25.6, 22, 18.5, 17.2 and 16.5 kD were detected as the major common bands in all C. jejuni strains. Electrophoretic analysis of C. coli strains revealed that protein band profiles ranged between 10.3 and 118 kD, and 76, 63-62, 52, 48.5, 44 and 30.5 kD bands were all major bands. Common antigenic structures with 67, 63, 43 and 29-31 kD were observed in the immunoblot analysis (Western blotting) of C. jejuni and C. coli strains. In addition, specific bands with 27 kD and 38 kD were detected in C. jejuni and C. coli strains, respectively. There was no difference in the cross immunoblot analysis carried out with immune sera prepared against C. jejuni and C. coli strains. In conclusion, protein profiles and immunogenic structures obtained by electrophoretic analysis of C. jejuni and C. coli strains were found to be similar.

Immunoblot Analysis of Campylobacters of Chickens

The aim of this study was to determine immunogenic structures by immunoblotting in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from chickens. The bands obtained from C. jejuni strains were found to be distributed between 10.8 and 116.5 kD by SDS-PAGE analysis of whole cell proteins. The bands 78, 63, 52, 48.5, 43.5, 29.8, 25.6, 22, 18.5, 17.2 and 16.5 kD were detected as the major common bands in all C. jejuni strains. Electrophoretic analysis of C. coli strains revealed that protein band profiles ranged between 10.3 and 118 kD, and 76, 63-62, 52, 48.5, 44 and 30.5 kD bands were all major bands. Common antigenic structures with 67, 63, 43 and 29-31 kD were observed in the immunoblot analysis (Western blotting) of C. jejuni and C. coli strains. In addition, specific bands with 27 kD and 38 kD were detected in C. jejuni and C. coli strains, respectively. There was no difference in the cross immunoblot analysis carried out with immune sera prepared against C. jejuni and C. coli strains. In conclusion, protein profiles and immunogenic structures obtained by electrophoretic analysis of C. jejuni and C. coli strains were found to be similar.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Light Microscopic Investigations on the Oviduct in Hens

Asuman ÖZEN

Detection of Infectious Bronchitis Virus in Tracheal Organ Cultures Using the Immunoperoxidase Technique

Ayşin ŞEN

İnfeksiyöz bronşitis virusu' nun trakeal organ kültürlerinde immunoperoksidaz tekniği ile saptanması

Ayşin ŞEN, Vildan CANER, Gürsel SÖNMEZ, M. Özgür ÖZYİĞİT

Marmara Bölgesi' nde yarış atı yetiştirilen haralardaki taylarda Rhodococcus equi infeksiyonunun ELISA ile erken tanısı üzerine çalışmalar

N. Yakut ÖZGÜR, Atila ILGAZ, Ömer AKAY, Babür CARİOĞLU, A. Funda BAĞCIGİL, Shinji TAKAI, Serkan İKİZ

Kuzey Doğu Akdeniz, İskenderun Körfezi' inde bulunan mavi yengeç (Callinectes sapidus RATHBUN, 1896)' in et kompozisyonu ve mevsimsel değişimi

Canan TÜRELİ, Ünal ERDEM, Mehmet ÇELİK

Histological Investigations on the Effects of Feeding with a Diet Containing Red Hot Pepper on the Uropygial Gland of a Rooster

Berrin ZIK, Hatice ERDOST

Studies on Early Diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi Infection by ELISA in Foals from Racehorse Breeding Studfarms in the Marmara Region

N. Yakut ÖZGÜR, Serkan İKİZ, A. Funda BAĞCIGİL

Identification of Chicken Originated Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Hasan Basri ERTAŞ, Burhan ÇETİNKAYA, Adile MUZ, Hasan ÖNGÖR

Vaccine development from serotypes 01, 02 and 078 of Escherichia coli against avian colibacillosis: Layer Chickens

Osman ERGANİŞ, H. Hüseyin HADIMLI, Hasan SOLMAZ

Detection of Cattle Infected with Theileria annulata in Fields by Nested PCR, IFAT and Microscopic Examination of Blood Smears

Zati VATANSEVER, Serpil NALBANTOĞLU