Abu B. SIDDIQ, Vedat ONAR, Pere M. PARÉS-CASANOVA, Ö. Emre ÖNCÜ, Hakan KAR

High level of fluctuating asymmetry in the Byzantine dogs from the Theodosius Harbor, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract: Asymmetry, the abnormality of an organism or a part of it from its perfect symmetry, is represented by three different categories: fluctuating asymmetry, directional asymmetry, and antisymmetry. Fluctuating asymmetry attributes to random developmental variation of a morphological character, whereas directional asymmetry attributes one of the body sides to be more prominent than the other. Antisymmetry appears whenever one body side of a biological body shows greater morphological appearance than the other. Since more environmental stress often produces greater effect of fluctuating asymmetry, it can be a good indicator of physiological stress in the morphological characteristic of a biological being. Applying, so far, the first geometric morphometric methods on any Byzantine fauna, this study aimed to determine the kind and direction of skull asymmetry occurred in Byzantine dog skulls. Aiming this, asymmetries in 16 adult Byzantine dog skulls unearthed form Yenikapı-Marmaray excavation (ancient Theodosius Harbor) in İstanbul, were compared with 39 adult skulls of modern pet dog breeds. Seventeen landmarks (3 midline and 14 bilateral) were selected on the digital pictures of the ventral aspect of each skull, and used for detailed analysis. The results showed a greater percentage of fluctuating asymmetry in the Byzantine dog skulls, suggesting them not to be the remains of pets or housed dogs but perhaps the labor or stray dogs in the Byzantine capital Constantinople.Key words: Byzantine dog, geometric morphometrics, fluctuating asymmetry, Theodosius Harbor, Canis familiaris, Yenikapı-Marmaray excavation, İstanbul

PDF

___

1. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Boston, MA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12- 778460-1.X5000-5
2. Drake AG, Coquerelle M, Kosintsev PA, Bachura OP, Sablin M et al. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of fossil canid mandibles and skulls. Scientific Reports 2017; 7 (1): 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10232-1
3. Kwiatkowska B, Borysławski K, Zawiasa J, Staszak K, Dabrowski P et al . Dentition asymmetry in series of skulls from St. Mary Magdalene church in Wroclaw. In: Publishing CG (editor) Fifth International Conference on Health, Wellness, and Society Health and Wellness in the Age of Big Data. Madrid, Spain: Universidad de Alcalà; 2015, pp. 179-186.
4. Urošević A, Ljubisavljević K, Ivanović A. Fluctuating asymmetry and individual variation in the skull shape of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis Laurenti, 1768) estimated by geometric morphometrics. The Herpetological Journal 2015; 25 (3): 177-186.
5. Haruda AF, Varfolomeev V, Goriachev A, Yermolayeva A, Outram AK. A new zooarchaeological application for geometric morphometric methods: distinguishing Ovis aries morphotypes to address connectivity and mobility of prehistoric Central Asian pastoralists. Journal of Archaeological Science 2019; 107: 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2019.05.002
6. Schmitt E, Wallace S. Shape change and variation in the cranial morphology of wild canids (Canis lupus, Canis latrans, Canis rufus) compared to domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) using geometric morphometrics. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2012; 24 (1): 42-50. doi: 10.1002/oa.1306
7. Mardia KV, Bookstein FL, Moreton IJ. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 2000; 87 (2): 285-300. doi: 10.1093/biomet/87.2.285
8. Klingenberg CP. Analyzing fluctuating asymmetry with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry 2015; 7 (2): 843-934. doi: 10.3390/sym7020843
9. Briones C, Guiñez R. Una revisión de la asimetría bilateral en bivalvos. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 2008; 43 (1): 1-6.
10. Pither J, Taylor PD. Directional and fluctuating asymmetry in the black winged damselfly Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois) (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 2000; 78 (10): 1740-1748. doi: 10.1139/z00-130
11. Auffray JC, Debat V, Alibert P. Shape asymmetry and developmental stability. In: Mark JCM, Chaplain AJ, Singh GD (editors.) On Growth and Form: Spatio-Temporal Pattern Formation in Biology. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1999, pp. 309-324.
12. Auerbach BM, Ruff CB. Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans. Journal of Human Evolution 2006; 50 (2): 203-218. doi: 10.1016/j. jhevol.2005.09.004
13. Bartosiewicz L, Van Neer W, Lentacker A. Metapodial asymmetry in draft cattle. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 1993; 3 (2): 69-75. doi: 10.1002/oa.1390030203
14. Rowe L, Repasky RR, Palmer AR. Size-dependent asymmetry: fluctuating asymmetry versus antisymmetry and its relevance to condition-dependent signaling. Evolution 1997; 51 (5): 1401- 1408. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01463.x
15. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behavioral Brain Science 2005; 28 (4): 575-589. doi: 10.1017/ S0140525X05000105
16. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix 2013; 24(1): 7-14. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6283
17. Reyment RA. Morphometrics: an historical essay. In: Elewa AMT (editor) Morphometric for Nonmorphometricians. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2010, pp. 9-25. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-540-95853-6
18. Onar V, Janeczek M, Pazvant V, Ince NG, Alpak H et al. Estimating the body weight of Byzantine dogs from the Theodosius Harbour at Yenikapı, Istanbul. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 2015; 21 (1): 55-59. [in Turkish]. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.11693
19. Onar V, Cakirlar C, Janeczek M, Kiziltan Z. Skull typology of Byzantine dogs from the Theodosius Harbour at Yenikapi, Istanbul. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia: Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series C 2012; 41 (5): 341-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2012.01143.x
20. Von den Driesch A. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Boston, MA, USA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Harvard University; 1976.
21. Rohlf FJ. The tps series of software. Hystrix 2015; 26 (1): 9-12. doi: 10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264
22. Adams DC. Methods for shape analysis of landmark data from articulated structures. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1999; 1 (8): 959-970.
23. Rohlf FJ. Geometric morphometrics simplified. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2005; 20 (1): 13-14. doi: 10.1016/j. tree.2004.08.005
24. Fruciano C. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics. Development Genes and Evolution 2016; 226 (3): 139-158. doi: 10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4
25 Klingenberg CP. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 2011; 11 (2): 353-357. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x
26. White AA, Panjabi MM, Hardy RJ. Analysis of mechanical symmetry in rabbit long bones. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica 1974; 45 (3): 328-336. doi: 10.3109/17453677408989153
27. Pomiankowski A. Genetic variation in fluctuating asymmetry. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 1997; 10 (1): 51-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1997.10010051.x
28. Willmore KE, Klingenberg, CP, Hallgrimsson B. The relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and environmental variance in rhesus macaque skulls. Evolution 2005; 59 (4): 898-909. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01763.x
29. Lazić MM, Carretero MA, Crnobrnja-Isailović J, Kaliontzopoulou A. Effects of environmental disturbance on phenotypic variation: an integrated assessment of canalization, developmental stability, modularity, and allometry in lizard head shape. The American Naturalist 2015; 185 (1): 44-58. doi: 10.1086/679011
30. Lezcano AH, Quiroga MLR, Liberoff AL, Van der Molen S. Marine pollution effects on the southern surf crab Ovalipes trimaculatus (Crustacea: Brachyura: Polybiidae) in Patagonia Argentina. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2015; 91 (2): 524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.038
31. Maestri R, Fornel R, Galiano D, de Freitas TRO. Niche suitability affects development: skull asymmetry increases in less suitable areas. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(4): e0122412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122412
32. Marchand H, Paillat G, Montuire S, Butet A. Fluctuating asymmetry in bank vole populations (Rodentia, Arvicolinae) reflects stress caused by landscape fragmentation in the MontSaint-Michel Bay. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2003; 80 (1): 37-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00206.x
33. Sánchez-Chardi A, García-Pando M, López-Fuster MJ. Chronic exposure to environmental stressors induces fluctuating asymmetry in shrews inhabiting protected Mediterranean sites. Chemosphere 2013; 93 (6): 916-923. doi: 10.1016/j. chemosphere.2013.05.056
34. Bigoni L, Krajíček V, Sládek V, Velemínsky P, Velemínska J. Skull shape asymmetry and the socioeconomic structure of an early medieval Central European society. American Journal of Physical Antrhropology 2013; 150 (3): 349-364. doi: 10.1002/ ajpa.22210
35. Leśniak K. Directional asymmetry of facial and limb traits in horses and ponies. Veterinary Journal 2018; 198 (1): 46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.032
36. Parés-Casanova PM. Harmonic analysis of equine hoof form and its matched symmetry. Research 2014; 1: 889. doi: 10.13070/rs.en.1.889
37. Parés-Casanova PM, Kucherova I. Horn antisymmetry in a local goat population. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Food Sciences 2013; 1 (2): 12-17.
38. Parés-Casanova PM, Bravi R. Directional and fluctuating asymmetries in domestic sheep skulls. Journal of Zoological and Bioscience Research 2014; 1 (2): 11-17.
39. Kharlamova A, Trut LN, Chase K, Kukekova AV, Lark KG. Directional asymmetry in the limbs, skull and pelvis of the silver fox (V. vulpes). Journal of Morphology 2010; 271 (12): 1501-1508. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10890
40. Lajus D, Katolikova M, Strelkov P, Hummel H () Fluctuating and directional asymmetry of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis): Improving methods of morphological analysis to explore species performance at the northern border of its range. Symmetry 2015; 7 (2): 488-514. doi: 10.3390/sym7020488
41. Costa M, Mateus RP, Moura MO. Constant fluctuating asymmetry but not directional asymmetry along the geographic distribution of Drosophila antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 2015; 59 (4): 337-342. doi: 10.1016/j.rbe.2015.09.004
42. Kroll H. Animals in the Byzantine Empire: an overview of the archaeozoological evidence. Archeologia Medievale 2012; XXXIX: 93-121.