Pouya ZAMANI, Seied Reza MIRAEI-ASHTIANI, Hosein MOHAMMADI

Genetic parameters of residual energy intake and its correlations with other traits in Holstein dairy correlations

Residual energy intake (REI) or residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between actual energy intake, is predicted on the basis of requirements for maintenance, milk production, and body weight change of an animal. Genetic variation of REI and its relationships with dry matter intake, milk yield, fat corrected milk yield and milk fat, and protein yields was investigated using 3503 monthly records collected from 906 Holstein lactating cows. Variance components were estimated using univariate and multivariate animal models with the derivative-free approach of restricted maximum likelihood algorithm, fitting animal models with fixed effects of herd-year-season, parity number and stage of lactation, and random effects of animal additive genetic and permanent environment. The estimated heritability and repeatability for REI were 0.15 and 0.53 from univariate, and 0.21 and 0.60 from multivariate models, respectively. REI had a genetically weak and negative correlation with yield traits (from - 0.05 to -0.08) and a positive correlation with dry matter intake (0.61). Moderate heritability estimate for REI, along with negligible genetic correlations with yield traits and high genetic correlation with dry matter intake, might reveal that selection against REI improves feed efficiency by reducing feed intake and increasing yield traits a little.

PDF

___

1. Milk Marketing Board: Report of the farm services division, 1988/89. No. 39. MMB, Thames Ditton, Surrey, UK, 1990.
2. VandeHaar, M.J.: Efficiency of nutrient use and relationship to profitability on dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci., 1998; 81: 272–282.
3. Brody, S.: Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publ. Co. New York. NY, 1945.
4. Buttazzoni, L., Mao, I.L.: Genetic parameters of estimated net energy efficiencies for milk production, maintenance, and body weight change in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 1989; 72: 671–677.
5. Wang, S., Roy, G.L., Lee, A.J., McAllister, A.J., Batra, T.R., Lin, C.Y., Vesely, J.A., Wauthy, J.M., Winter, K.A.: Evaluation of various measures of and factors influencing feed efficiency of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 1992; 75: 1273–1280.
6. Koch, R.M., Swiger, L.A., Chambers, D., Gregory, K.E.: Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 1963; 22: 486–494.
7. Kennedy, B.W., van der Werf, J.H.J., Meuwissen, T.H.E.: Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci., 1993; 71: 3239–3250.
8. Van Arendonk, J.A.M., Nieuwhof, G.L., Vos, H., Korver, S.: Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livest. Prod. Sci., 1991; 29: 263–275.
9. Veerkamp, R.F., Emmans, G.C., Cromie, A.R., Simm, G.: Variance components for residual feed intake in dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci., 1995; 41: 111–120.
10. Ngwerume, F., Mao, I.L.: Estimation of residual energy intake for lactating cows using an animal model. J. Dairy Sci., 1992; 75: 2283–2287.
11. Svendsen, M., Skipenes, P., Mao, I.L.: Genetic parameters in the feed conversion complex of primiparous cows in the first two trimesters. J. Anim. Sci., 1993; 71: 1721–1729.
12. Sainz, R.D., Paulino, P.V.: Residual feed intake. Annual Beef & Range Field Day Proceedings. Sierra Foothill Research & Exhibition Center. University of California. 2004.
13. National Research Council: Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th edn. National Academy Press. Washington, DC, 2001.
14. Agricultural and Food Research Council: Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: energy. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, Report No. 5. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Series B, 1991; 60: 729–804.
15. Edmonson, A.J., Lean, I.J., Weaver, L.D., Farver, T., Webster, G.: A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 1989; 72: 68–78.
16. SAS Institute Inc.: SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements through release 8.02, Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC., 2002.
17. Graser, H.U., Smith, S.P., Tier, B.: A derivative-free approach for estimating variance components in animal models by restricted maximum likelihood. J. Anim. Sci., 1987; 64: 1362–1370.
18. Meyer, K.: Programs to estimate variance components by restricted maximum likelihood using a derivative-free algorithm. User notes. Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Univ. New England, Armidable, NSW, Australia, 1997.
19. Madgwick, P.P., Beard, K.A., Goddard, M.E.: Possibilities for incorporating selection for feed conversion efficiency into the national dairy herd improvement program. Proc. 9th Mtg. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Br. Gen., Australia. 1991; 45-48.
20. Archer, J.A., Arthur, P.F., Herd, R.M., Richardson, E.C.: Genetic variation in feed efficiency and its component traits. Proc. 6th World Congr. Gen. Appl. Livest. Prod. NSW, Australia, 1998; 25: 81–84.
21. Arthur, P.F., Archer, J.A., Johnston, D.J., Herd, R.M., Richardson, E.C., Parnell, P.F.: Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other post weaning traits in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 2001; 79: 2805–2811.
22. Gunsett, F.C.: Linear index selection to improve traits defined as ratios. J. Anim. Sci., 1984; 59: 1185–1193.
23. Johnson, D.E., Ferrell, C.L., Jenkins, T.G.: The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going? J. Anim. Sci., 2003; 81(E. Suppl.): E27-E38.
24. Hegarty, R.S., Goopy, J.P., Herd, R.M., McCorkell, B.: Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. J. Anim. Sci., 2007; 85: 1479-1486.
25. Kolath, W.H., Kerley, M.S., Golden, J.W. Keisler, D.H.: The relationship between mitochondrial function and residual feed intake in Angus steers. J. Anim. Sci., 2006; 84: 861-865.
26. Kahi, A.K., Hirooka, H.: Effect of direct and indirect selection criteria for efficiency of gain on profitability of Japanese Black cattle selection strategies. J. Anim. Sci., 2007; 85: 2401-2412.
27. Butler, W.R., Smith, R.D.: Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 1989; 72: 767–783.
28. Rauw, W.M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Grommers, F.J.: Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 1998; 56: 15–33.
29. Pryce, J.E., Royal, M.D., Garnsworthy, P.C., Mao, I.L.: Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow. Livest. Prod. Sci., 2004; 86: 125–135.
30. Herd, R.M., Bishop, S.C.: Genetic variation in residual feed intake and its association with other production traits in British Hereford cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci., 2000; 63: 111–119.
31. Nkrumah, J.D., Basarab, J.A., Price, M.A., Okine, E.K., Ammoura, A., Guercio, S., Hansen, C., Li, C., Benkel, B., Murdoch, B., Moore, S.S.: Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 2004; 82: 2451- 2459.