Fatma Tülin ÖZBAŞER, Fatih ATASOY, Banu YÜCEER ÖZKUL, Metin ERDOĞAN, Bora ÖZARSLAN

Evaluation of some morphological and genetic characteristics of Çatalburun dog breed

Çatalburun (Fork-nose) dogs are the members of Turkey›s indigenous gene pool. Although there are some studies on phenotypic identification of this breed, there is no study on genetic characterization. This study aimed to define the detailed morphological and genetic characteristics of this breed. For this purpose, initially, some morphological traits in 100 Çatalburun dogs were measured. Furthermore, the blood samples were taken from a total of 62 animals to identify genetic characteristics. The mean live weight was found as 20.20 kg, and the means of withers height, rump height and body length were measured as 48.2, 49.1 and 54.1 cm, respectively. In the microsatellite analysis, the mean of inbreeding coefficient (FIS) was calculated as 0.048. The observed (Ho) and the expected heterozygosity (He) values were determined as 0.743 ± 0.12 and 0.744 ± 0.11, respectively. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence analyses revealed that AHT 137 loci (12 alleles) and REN247M2 loci (4 alleles) were found to have the highest and the lowest frequencies. The highest frequencies in A and B haplogroups were found to be A18 (14.52%) and B1 (59.68%) haplotypes, respectively. The factorial similarity analysis denoted that the examined dogs may be grouped in closely-related two parent lines. Although the heterozygosity values were found to be relatively high, conversely, the mutation or nucleotide diversities were found to be low. This is the first study to comprehensively describe the genomic diversity and population structure of the Çatalburun breed. Special attentions should be taken to the protection of this breed as soon as possible.

PDF

___

1. Kim J, Williamsa FJ, Dregera DL, Plassaisa J, Davisa BW et al. Genetic selection of athletic success in sport-hunting dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018; 115: 7212-7221.
2. Letko A, Minor KM, Jagannathan V, Seefried FR, Mickelson JR et al. Genomic diversity and population structure of the Leonberger dog breed. Genetics, Selection and Evolution 2020; 52: 61-72.
3. Petek M, Dinçel D. Çatalburun köpekleri ve ırk özellikleri. Uludag University Journal of Faculty Veterinary Medicine 2012; 31: 25-28 (in Turkish).
4. Tiftikçioğlu C. Çatalburun (Turkish Pointer). Ankara Bölgesi Veteriner Hekimler Odası Bülteni 2007; Volume? Issue? 20-23 (in Turkish).
5. Yılmaz O. Some morphological traits of the Tarsus fork-nose dog in Turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 2002; 18: 138-143.
6. Spira RH. Canine Terminology. New York, NY, USA: Howell Book House Inc.; 1991.
7. Tepeli C, Çetin O. Determination of growth, some body measurements and reproductive traits of Kangal Turkish Shepherd Dogs. I. Growth and some body measurements. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2000; 16: 5-16 (in Turkish).
8. Tepeli C, Çetin O. A study on head measurements of Kangal and Akbas Turkish shepherd dogs. The Journal of Veterinary Science 2003; 19: 17-20.
9. Özdamar K. Paket Programları ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi. Ankara, Turkey: Nisan Kitabevi; 2017 (in Turkish).
10. Erdoğan M, Tepeli C, Brenig B, Akbulut MD, Uğuz C et al. Genetic variability among native dog breeds in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Biology 2013; 37:176-183.
11. Nei M and Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2000.
12. Wright S. The Theory of Gene Frequencies, Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press; 1978.
13. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Goudet J, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.00 WindowsTM Software for Population Genetics, Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Intereactions. Montpellier, France: University of Montpellier Press; 2000.
14. Özbaşer FT, Atasoy F, Erdoğan M, Yüceer Özkul B, Özarslan B. Morphological and genetic characteristics of Zerdava, a native Turkish dog breed. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2020; 26: 617-623.
15. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007; 24: 1596-1599.
16. Kumar S, Stecher G., Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2018; 35: 1547- 1549.
17. Tajıma F. Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989; 123: 585- 595.
18. Oğrak YZ, Yoldaş A, Urosevic M, Drobnjak D. Some morphological traits of Tarsus Çatalburun breed of Turkish hunting dog. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2014; 30: 25-29.
19. Kirmizibayrak T, Takci I. Body weight and morphological characteristics of Tarsus Çatalburun dogs. Indian Veterinary Journal 2006; 83: 914-915.
20. Neradilova S, Connell L, Hulva P, Bolfıkova BC. Tracing genetic resurrection of pointing dog breeds: Cesky Fousek as both survivor and rescuer. Plos-One 2019, 14:e0221418.
21. Altunok V, Koban E, Chicki L, Schaffer A, Pedersen NC et al. Genetic evidence for the distinctness of Kangal dogs. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 2005; 49: 249-254.
22. Pang JF, Kluetsch C, Zou XJ, Zhang AB, Luo LY et al. mtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs south of Yangtze River, less than 16, 300 years ago, from numerous wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009; 26: 2849-2864.
23. Savolainen P, Zhang Y, Luo J, Lundeberg J, Leitner T. Genetic evidence for an east Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 2002; 298: 1610-1613.
24. Savolainen P. Domestication of dogs. In: Jensen P (editor). The Behavioral Biology of Dogs. Cambridge, USA: CABI International Press; 2007.
25. Klutsch CFC, Seppala EH, Fall T, Uhlén M, Hedhammar A et al. Regional occurrence, high frequency but low diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup d1 suggests a recent dog-wolf hybridization in Scandinavia. Animal Genetics 2011; 42:100-103.
26. Parra D, Mendez S, Canon J, Dunner S. Genetic differentiation in pointing dog breeds inferred from microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA sequence. Animal Genetics 2008; 39: 1-7.
27. González A, Luque M, Herrera M, González G, Angón E et al. Usefulness of discriminant analysis in the morphofunctional classification of Spanish dog breeds. Archiv Tierzucht 2014; 57: 1-16.