Differences in physico-chemical parameters of goat milk depending on breed type, physiological and environmental factors

The objective of the research was to analyse the technological parameters of milk and assess the impact of selected factors, i.e. the genetic group of goats improved goats?Saanen crosses vs various crossbreds of unknown genetic origin?breedless goats with different coat for which no breeding books were kept , production season winter, spring/summer, and autumn , which was associated with the stage of lactation 1, 2, and 3 , the region where the goats were raised upland or mountainous areas and daily yield 2.0 kg . A total of 480 milk samples were evaluated 203 milk samples from Saanen crosses and 277 from various crossbreds of unknown genetic origin . The milk was tested for proximate chemical composition, casein content, active and potential acidity, coagulation time, and heat stability. All factors analysed were found to significantly affect daily milk yield, potential acidity and composition contents of fat, nonfat dry matter, total protein, and casein . Goat crossbreds of unknown genetic origin produced milk with better chemical composition, i.e. higher contents of fat, nonfat dry matter, total protein, and casein, and technological parameters? higher heat stability despite lower daily yield than Saanen crosses, especially in autumn end of lactation . The region of production was also significant. Goats raised in mountainous areas produced milk with a more favourable chemical composition, i.e. higher content of dry matter and protein, including casein, but with lower heat stability, in most cases irrespective of the production season. As daily milk yield increased, there was a decrease in the content of fat and nonfat dry matter, including total protein and casein, as well as a reduction in the rennet clotting time. Analysed factors and their interactions play an important role in shaping the chemical composition of goat milk and determine its technological usefulness.

___

  • 1. FAOSTAT: Statistics Division (Internet). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2019. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed August 20, 2019.
  • 2. Strzałkowska N, Bagnicka E, Jóźwik A, Krzyżewski J. Concentration of total cholesterol in milk of Polish White Improved goats during the whole lactation. Archiv Tierzucht 2006; 49: 166-173.
  • 3. Biadała A, Konieczny P. Goat’s milk-derived bioactive components – a review. Mljekarstvo 2018; 68 (4): 239-253.
  • 4. Ribeiro AC, Ribeiro SDA. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 2010; 89: 225-233.
  • 5. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U, Prosser CG. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: Quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Research 2010; 89: 110-124.
  • 6. Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z, Wolanciuk A, Szmatoła T. Chemical composition and selected parameters of technological suitability of caprine milk produced in organic and conventional farms. Italian Journal of Food Science 2013; 25 (1): 105-108.
  • 7. Micari P, Sarullo V, Sidari R, Carid A. Physico-chemical and hygienic characteristics of the calabrian raw milk cheese, Caprino d’Aspromonte. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciiences 2007; 31 (1): 55-60.
  • 8. Vacca GM, Stocco G, Dettori ML, Summer A, Cipolat-Gotet C et al. Cheese yield, cheese-making efficiency, and daily production of six breeds of goats. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 7817-7832.
  • 9. Cecchinato, A., Bittante G. Genetic and environmental relationships of different measures of individual cheese yield and curd nutrients recovery with coagulation properties of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 2016; 99: 1975-1989.
  • 10. Stocco G, Pazzola M, Dettori ML, Paschino P, Bittante G et al. Effect of composition on coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis of goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 9693-9702.
  • 11. Banjare K, Kumar M, Kumar R, Kartikyen S, Goel BK et al. Perspective role of goat milk and products: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017; 5 (4): 1328-1338.
  • 12. Faka M. Lewis MJ, Grandison AS, Deeth H. The effect of free Ca2+ on the heat stability and other characteristics of low-heat skim milk powder. International Dairy Journal 2009; 19: 386- 392.
  • 13. Park YW, Juárez M, Ramos M, Haenlein GFW. Physicochemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 2007; 68: 88-113.
  • 14. Pastuszka R, Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z. Nutritional value and health-promoting properties of goat milk. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2015; 71 (8): 480-485.
  • 15. AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. (17th ed.) Casein in milk, 998.06. AOAC International 2010; Arlington, VA.
  • 16. Davies DT, White JCD. The stability of milk proteins to heat. 1. Subjective measurements of heat stability of milk. Journal of Dairy Research 1966; 33: 67-81.
  • 17. Brodziak A, Król J, Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z. Effect of production season on protein fraction content in milk of various breeds of goats in Poland. International Journal of Dairy Technology 2014; 67 (3): 410-419.
  • 18. Baltrėnaitė L, Kerzienė S, Morkūnienė K, Miceikienė I. Genetic diversity in milk proteins among goats bred in Lithuania. Acta Universitatis Latviensis Biology 2009; 753: 117-124.
  • 19. Strzałkowska N, Bagnicka E, Jóźwik A, Krzyżewski J, Ryniewicz Z. Chemical composition and some technological milk parameters of Polish White Improved Goats. Archiv Tierzucht 2004; 47 (Special Issue): 122-128.
  • 20. Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z, Kędzierska-Matysek M, Litwińczuk A. Polymorphism of caprine milk αs1 -casein in relation to performance of four Polish goat breeds. Polish Journal of Veterinary Science 2007; 10 (3): 159-164.
  • 21. Devold TG, Nordbø R, Langsrud T, Svenning C, Jansen BM. et al. Extreme frequencies of the αs1-casein ‘‘null’’ variant in milk from Norwegian dairy goats – implications for milk composition, micellar size and renneting properties. Dairy Science and Technology 2011; 91: 39-51.
  • 22. Ceballos LS, Morales ER, de la Torre Adarve G, Castro JD, Martínez LP et al. Composition of goat and cow milk produced under similar conditions and analyzed by identical methodology. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2009; 22: 322-329.
  • 23. Mestawet TA, Girma A, Ådnøy T, Devold TG, Narvhus JA et al. Milk production, composition and variation at different lactation stages of four goat breeds in Ethiopia. Small Ruminant Research 2012; 105: 176-181.
  • 24. Danków R., Pikul J. Technological suitability of goat milk for processing. Nauka. Przyroda. Technologie 2011; 5 (2): 1-15 (in Polish with an abstract in English).
  • 25. Park YW. Bioactive components in goat milk. In: Bioactive components in milk and dairy products. (Ed.) Park YW., Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2009.
  • 26. Wang C, Zhu Y, Wang J. Comparative study on the heat stability of goat milk and cow milk. Indian Journal of Animal Research 2016; 50 (4): 610-613.
  • 27. Clark S, Sherbon JW. Alpha s1-casein, milk composition and coagulation properties of goat milk. Small Ruminant Research 2000; 38: 123-134.
  • 28. Barłowska J, Wolanciuk A, Kędzierska-Matysek M, Litwińczuk Z. Effect of production season on basic chemical composition and content of macro- and microelements in cow’s and goat’s milk. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość. 2013; 91 (6): 69-78 (in Polish with an abstract in English).
  • 29. Barłowska J, Szwajkowska M, Litwińczuk Z, Grodzicki T, Wolanciuk A. Physico-chemical properties and technological usability of caprine milk from various breeds in regard to the production season. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu 2011; 196: 188-195 (in Polish with an abstract in English).
  • 30. Kędzierska-Matysek M, Barłowska J, Litwińczuk Z, Koperska N. Content of macro- and microelements in goat milk in relation to the lactation stage and region of production. Journal of Elementology. 2015; 20 (1): 107-114.
  • 31. Žan M, Stibilj V, Rogelj I. Milk fatty acid composition of goats grazing on alpine pasture. Small Ruminant Research 2006; 64: 45-52.
  • 32. Mioč B, Prpić Z, Vnučec I, Barać Z, Sušić V et al. Factors affecting goat milk yield and composition. Mljekarstvo 2008; 58 (4): 305-313.
  • 33. Wolanciuk A, Barłowska J, Pastuszka R, Topyła B. Basic chemical composition and the selected fat parameters of caprine milk from summer and autumn-winter feeding period. Roczniki Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Zootechnicznego 2013; 9 (2): 63-70 (in Polish with an abstract in English).
  • 34. Balia F, Pazzola M, Dettori ML, Mura MC, Luridiana S et al. Effect of CSN1S1 gene polymorphism and stage of lactation on milk yield and composition of extensively reared goats. Journal of Dairy Research 2013; 80: 129-137.
  • 35. Králíčková Š, Kuchtík J, Filipčík R, Lužová T, Šustová K. Effect of chosen factors on milk yield, basic composition and somatic cell count of organic milk of Brown Short-haired goats. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 2013; LXI (1): 99-105.
  • 36. Kuchtík J, Králíčková Š, Zapletal D, Węglarzy K, Šustová K et al. Changes in physico-chemical characteristics, somatic cell count and fatty acid profile of Brown Short-haired goat milk during lactation. Animal Science Papers and Reports 2015; 33 (1): 71-83.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK