A Comparative Study between Matrix Converter Fed InductionMotor Drive and Dual-Matrix Converter Fed Open-End WindingInduction Motor Drive

A Comparative Study between Matrix Converter Fed InductionMotor Drive and Dual-Matrix Converter Fed Open-End WindingInduction Motor Drive

This paper deals with a comparative study between the control of three to three phase matrix converter feeding astar-connected three phase induction machine and the control of three to three phase dual matrix converterfeeding an open-end winding induction machine. The control strategy used in both cases is based on a proposeddirect transfer function control approach of Venturini algorithm which allows to obtain a unity power factor atthe input side to boost the output phase voltage up to 150% compared to the input phase voltage, while keepingthe main advantage of the matrix converter by providing a fully bidirectional power flow operation. The mainobjective of using the open-end winding topology is to ensure the minimization of the common mode voltagewhich is clearly observed in the case of star-connected winding. Simulation results are presented under bothcontrol strategies, where both matrix converters are supplied from the same three-phase power source. Whereas;the two output voltage system of the dual matrix converter are shifted with 180 degrees. Based on the obtainedresults the performances of the both control approaches are technically discussed.

___

  • 1. Riedemanna, J., Andradeb, I., Peñab, R., BlascoGimenezc, R.,Clare J., Melin, P., Rivera, M. (2016). Modulation strategies for an open-end winding induction machine fed by a two-output indirect matrix converter, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,144-152.
  • 2.Wheeler, P.W., Rodriguez P.W., Clare, J.C., Empringham, L., Weinstein, A., (2002). Matrix converters: A technology review. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49(2), 276-288.
  • 3. Vargas, R., Rodríguez, J., Ammann, U., Wheeler, PW. (2008). Predictive current control of an induction machine fed by a matrix converter with reactive power control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 55(12), 4362-4371.
  • 4. Venturini, M. (1980). A new sine wave in sine wave out, conversion technique which eliminates reactive elements. POWERCON 7, E3-1-E3-15.
  • 5. Alesina, A., Venturini, M. (1989). Analysis and design of optimum-amplitude nine-switch direct ACAC converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 4(1), 101-112.
  • 6. Ahmed, S.M., Abu-Rub, H., Kouzou, A. (2013). Predictive simultaneous power and current control in a three-phase direct matrix converter. International Conference on Power Electronics and Their Applications (ICPEA), Djefia-Algeria.
  • 7. Bachir, G., Bendiabdellah, A. (2009). A comparative study between two control strategies for matrix converter. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(2), 23-27.
  • 8. Beladel, A., Kouzou, A., Hafaifa, A., Mahia D., (2016). Dual matrix converter feeding an open-end winding load based on modified direct transfer approach, International Scientific Conference on Engineering, Technologies and Systems.
  • 9. Altun, H., Sünter, S. (2003). Matrix converter induction motor drive: modeling, simulation and control. Electrical Engineering, 86(1), 25-33.
  • 10. Rodriguez, J., Silva, E., Wheeler, P., (2013). Matrix converter controlled with the direct transfer function approach:analysis, modelling and simulation, International Journal of Electronics, 63-85.
  • 11. Djahbar A., Mazari B., (2007). High performance motor drive using matrix converter, Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 2(7).
  • 12. Guizana, S., Ammar, F.B., (2005). Dual open-end stator winding induction machine fed by redundant voltage source inverters, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 92(2), 2171-2181.
  • 13. Riedemann, J., Clare, J.C., Wheeler, P.W., Blasco-Gimenez, R., Rivera, M., Pena, R. (2016). Open-end winding induction machine fed by a dualoutput indirect matrix converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(7), 4118-4128.
  • 14. Gopal, M., Gopakumar, K., Tekwani, P.N., Emil, L.A., (2007). Reduced-switch-count five-level inverter with common-mode voltage elimination for an open-end winding induction motor drive, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(4).
  • 15. Elbar, M., Mahmoidi, M.O., Naas, B., (2010). A Carrier-Based PWM Techniques Applied to a ThreeLevel Four-Leg Inverter For Use as a Shunt Active Power Filter, J. Electrical Systems, Special Issue (2), 47-57.