We aimed to determine seizure characteristics of pediatric patients with epilepsy, and evaluate if Semiological Seizure Classification (SSC) system is applicable in this cohort. We retrospectively studied 183 patients, aged between 3 months-18 years, admitted to the video-EEG monitoring unit (VEMU). Most patients suffered from intractable epilepsy with comorbidities, and had structural lesions. Seizures were classified based on ictal video-EEG recordings by using SSC system; 157 patients had only one seizure type, 26 had more than one seizure types. Overall 211 seizures and 373 semiologies were analyzed; 114 seizures (54%) had more than one semiological subtype. The most frequent semiology was motor seizures (78%), followed by dialeptic seizures (12%). The most common subtypes were simple motor seizures (49%); tonic seizures constituted (28.4%) of all semiologies. We conclude that SSC system is applicable for children with epilepsy admitted to VEMU; complementary EEG and imaging data are required for evaluation of patients with epilepsy.
___
1. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the ILAE. Proposal for Revised Clinical and Electroencephalographic Classification of Epileptic Seizures. From the Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 1981; 22: 489-501.
2. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the ILAE. Proposal for Revised Classification of Epilepsies and Epileptic Syndromes. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 389-399.
3. Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, et al. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies. Report of the ILAE Commission on the Classification and Terminology, 2005-2009. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 676-685.
4. Lüders H, Acharya J, Baumgartner C, et al. Semiological seizure classification. Epilepsia 1998; 39: 1006-1013.
5. Benbadis SR, Thomas P, Pontone G. A prospective comparison between two seizure classifications. Seizure 2001; 10: 247-249.
6. Baykan B, Ertas NK, Ertas M, Aktekin B, Saygi S, Gokyigit A; Epibase Group. Comparison of classifications of seizures: a preliminary study with 28 participants and 48 seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2005; 6: 607-612.
7. Kim KJ, Lee R, Chae JH, Hwang YS. Application of semiological seizure classification to epileptic seizures in children. Seizure 2002; 11: 281-284.
8. Hirfanoğlu T, Serdaroğlu A, Cansu A, et al. Semiologic seizure classification: before and after Video-EEG monitoring of seizures. Pediatr Neurol 2007; 36: 231- 235.
9. Hamer HM, Wyllie E, Lüders HO, Kotagal P, Acharya J. Symptomatology of epileptic seizures in the first three years of life. Epilepsia 1999; 40: 837-844.
10. Wyllie E, Comair YG, Kotagal P, et al. Seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in children and adolescents. Ann Neurol 1998 44: 740-748.
11. Duchowny M, Levin B, Jayakar P, et al. Temporal lobectomy in early childhood. Epilepsia 1992; 33: 298-303.
12. Jayakar P, Duchowny MS. Complex partial seizures of temporal lobe origin in early childhood. J Epilepsy 1990; 3(Suppl): 41-45.
13. Tufenkjian K, Lüders HO. Seizure semiology: its value and limitations in localizing the epileptogenic zone. J Clin Neurol 2012; 8: 243-250.
14. Källén K, Wyllie E, Lüders HO, Lachhwani D, Kotagal P. Hypomotor seizures in infants and children. Epilepsia 2002; 43: 882-888.
15. Nordli DR Jr, Bazil CW, Scheuer ML, Pedley TA. Recognition and classification of seizures in infants. Epilepsia 1997; 38: 553-560.
16. Spencer S, Huh L. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 525-537.
17. Parra J, Augustijn PB, Geerts Y, van Emde Boas W. Classification of epileptic seizures: a comparison of two systems. Epilepsia 2001; 42: 476-482.
18. Noachtar S, Peters AS. Semiology of epileptic seizures: a critical review. Epilepsy Behav 2009; 15: 2-9.
19. Loesch AM, Feddersen B, Irsel Tezer F, et al. Seizure semiology identifies patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2015; 109: 197-202.