The Turkish version of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale: reliability and validity from the viewpoint of balance

Background/aim: The factors associated with fall-related self-efficacy should be addressed, especially in the elderly. The Modified FallsEfficacy Scale (MFES) is a simple instrument with good scaling properties and reliability. The aim of the present study was to determinethe reliability and the validity of the Turkish version of the MFES from the viewpoint of balance.Materials and methods: In this study, 164 participants aged >65 years were included. The use of walking aids and assistive devices,history and frequency of falls in the previous year, living environment, and exercise habits were noted. Balance and risk of falling wereassessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). A forward-backward translation procedure was used for the Turkish version of the MFES.Results: None of the 14 items in the MFES were modified. The Turkish version of the MFES has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’salpha, 0.978) and reliability (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.928–0.982), and its construct validity was supported by its ability todistinguish between the groups with respect to fall-risk factors and balance. According to the BBS scores, the high-fall-risk group hadlower MFES scores than the moderate- and low-fall-risk groups (χ2 = 34.153, P = 0.001).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MFES is a sensitive instrument for evaluation of fall-related confidence while carrying out indoor/outdoor activities. It also predicts falls, reduced physical activity, balance and mobility problems, and restricted social participation anddaily living activities.

PDF

___

1. Chan PPW, Chan APS, Lau E, Delbaere K, Chan YH et al. Translation and validation study of the Chinese version Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale-Short Version (Icon-FES). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2018; 77 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.03.008
2. O’Halloran AM, Pénard N, Galli A, Fan CW, Robertson IH et al. Falls and falls efficacy: the role of sustained attention in older adults. BMC Geriatrics 2011; 11: 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2318-11-85
3. Jiang XY, Chen Y, Yang ML, Zhu XL. Predictors of Falls Efficacy Scale responses among nursing home residents in China. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 2016; 3 (1): 24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.02.012
4. Pua YH, Ong PH, Clark RA, Matcher DB, Lim EC. Falls efficacy, postural balance, and risk for falls in older adults with falls-related emergency department visits: prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatrics 2017; 17 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1186/s12877- 017-0682-2
5. World Health Organization. Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007.
6. Mosallanezhad Z, Salavati M, Hellström K, Reza Sotoudeh G, Nilsson Wikmar L et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the modified falls efficacy scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 2011; 33 (25-26): 2446- 2453. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.574774
7. Pollock RD, Martin FC, Newham DJ. Whole-body vibration in addition to strength and balance exercise for falls-related functional mobility of frail older adults: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2012; 26 (10): 915-923. doi: 10.1177/0269215511435688
8. Loft CC, Jones FW, Kneebone II. Falls self-efficacy and falls incidence in community-dwelling older people: the mediating role of coping. International Psychogeriatrics 2018; 30 (5): 727- 733. doi:10.1017/S1041610217002319
9. Toraman A, Yildirim NU. The falling risk and physical fitness in older people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2010; 51 (2): 222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.10.012
10. Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H et al. The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age and Ageing 2010; 39 (2): 210-216. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225
11. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C et al. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy ScaleInternational (FES-I). Age and Ageing 2005; 34 (6): 614-619. doi:10.1093/ageing/afi196
12. Hauer K, Yardley L, Beyer N, Kempen G, Dias N et al. Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale and Falls Efficacy Scale International in geriatric patients with and without cognitive impairment: results of self-report and interview-based questionnaires. Gerontology 2010; 56 (2): 190-199. doi: 10.1159/000236027
13. Hill KD, Schwarz JA, Kalogeropoulos AJ, Gibson SJ. Fear of falling revisited. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77 (10): 1025-1029.
14. Aleksic J, Zvekic-Svorcan J, Vujasinovic Stupar N, Jeremic I, Grgurevic A. Cross-cultural validation of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale in Serbian community-dwelling women at risk for osteoporotic fracture. Menopause 2018; 25 (4): 444-450. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001009
15. Votruba KL, Persad C, Giordani B. Cognitive deficits in healthy elderly population with “normal” scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 2016; 29 (3): 126-132. doi: 10.1177/0891988716629858
16. Pereira VV, Maia RA, Silva SM. The functional assessment Berg Balance Scale is better capable of estimating fall risk in the elderly than the posturographic Balance Stability System. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 2013; 71 (1): 5-10. doi: 10.1590/ S0004-282X2013000100003
17. Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2010; 10 (1): 1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-13
18. Ayvat E, Kılınç M, Kırdı N. The Turkish version of the physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): its cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2017; 47 (3): 908-915. doi: 10.3906/sag-1605-7
19. Kwok BC, Mamun K, Chandran M, Wong CH. Evaluation of the Frails’ Fall Efficacy by Comparing Treatments (EFFECT) on reducing fall and fear of fall in moderately frail older adults: study protocol for a randomised control trial. Trials 2011; 12: 1-7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-155
20. Harding K, Robinson D, Grant M. Old tool, new tricks? A new adaptation of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2015; 22 (1): 11-19. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.1.11
21. Joshi S, Kumar GP. Validation of the Gujarati and Hindi versions of Modified Falls Efficacy Scale. Annals of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy 2018; 1 (1): 1-12.
22. Nick N, Petramfar P, Ghodsbin F, Keshavarzi S, Jahanbin I. The effect of yoga on balance and fear of falling in older adults. PM & R Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 2016; 8 (2): 145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.442
23. Okuyan CB, Bilgili N, Kitis Y. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale of in older adults. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research 2018; 7: 494. doi: 10.4172/2167-7182.1000494
24. Perrot A, Castanier C, Maillot P, Zitari H. French validation of the modified-falls efficacy scale (M-FES Fr). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2018; 78: 233-239. doi: 10.1016/j. archger.2018.07.001
25. Lui W. Validity of the Chinese version of modified falls efficacy scale in predicting falls among community-dwelling elderly in Hong Kong. MSc, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, 2005.
26. Ulus Y, Durmus D, Akyol Y, Terzi Y, Bilgici A et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) in community-dwelling older persons. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2012; 54 (3): 429-433. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.06.010
27. Halaweh H, Svantesson U, Rosberg S, Willen C. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Medical Principles and Practice 2016; 25 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1159/000441128
28. Edwards N, Lockett D. Development and validation of a modified falls-efficacy scale. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008; 3 (4): 193-200. doi: 10.1080/17483100801897198
29. Neupert SD, Lachman ME, Whitbourne SB. Exercise selfefficacy and control beliefs predict exercise behavior after an exercise intervention for older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity 2009; 17 (1): 1-16.