Abdominal girth has a strong correlation with actual and ultrasound estimated epidural depth

Abdominal girth has a strong correlation with actual and ultrasound estimated epidural depth

Background/aim: This study aimed to assess the correlations of actual epidural depth (ND) and ultrasound estimated epidural depthin the paramedian sagittal oblique plane (ED/PSO) and transverse median plane (ED/TM) with the abdominal girth (AG), body massindex (BMI), and weight of patients.Materials and methods: One hundred and thirty patients of either sex scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair were enrolled.ED/PSO and ED/TM were assessed with a 2–5 MHz curved array probe at the L3–4 intervertebral space. The epidural needle wasmarked with a sterile marker upon locating the epidural space. The ND was assessed by measuring the distance from the sterile markerto the tip of the epidural needle with a linear scale. Anthropometric measures of the patients were recorded.Results: ED/PSO was 49.6 ± 7.9 mm, ED/TM was 49.5 ± 7.9 mm, and ND was 50.0 ± 8.0 mm. AG was 99.8 ± 12.9 cm. The Pearsoncorrelation coefficient between ND and ED/PSO was 0.997 and with ED/TM was 0.996 (P < 0.001 for both). Pearson correlationcoefficients for ND with AG, BMI, and weight were 0.757, 0.547, and 0.638, respectively (P < 0.001 for all).Conclusion: AG, weight, and BMI have strong correlations with ND.

___

  • 1. Grau T, Leipold R, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasonography and peridural anesthesia. Technical possibilities and limitations of ultrasonic examination of the epidural space. Anaesthesist 2001; 50: 94-101 (in German with an abstract in English). doi: 10.1007/s001010050
  • 2. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2001; 26: 64-67. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.19633
  • 3. Chauhan AK, Bhatia R, Agrawal S. Lumbar epidural depth using transverse ultrasound scan and its correlation with loss of resistance technique: a prospective observational study in Indian population. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2018; 12: 279- 282. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_679_17
  • 4. Gnaho A, Nguyen V, Villevielle T, Frota M, Marret E et al. Assessing the depth of the subarachnoid space by ultrasound. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2012; 62: 520-530. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70150-2
  • 5. Helayel PE, da Conceicao DB, Meurer G, Swarovsky C, de Oliveira Filho GR. Evaluating the depth of the epidural space with the use of ultrasound. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2010; 60: 376-382. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(10)70046-5
  • 6. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2001; 45: 766-771. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006766.x
  • 7. Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO et al. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2001; 13: 213-217. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00245-8
  • 8. Khemka R, Rastogi S, Desai N, Chakraborty A, Sinha S. Comparison of ultrasound imaging in the transverse median and parasagittal oblique planes for thoracic epidurals: a pilot study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 60: 377-381. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.183398
  • 9. Salman A, Arzola C, Tharmaratnam U, Balki M. Ultrasound imaging of the thoracic spine in paramedian sagittal oblique plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2011; 36: 542-547. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31823217e7
  • 10. Kim YH, Park HJ, Moon DE. Ultrasound-guided pararadicular injection in the lumbar spine: a comparative study of the paramedian sagittal and paramedian sagittal oblique approaches. Pain Practice 2015; 15: 693-700. doi: 10.1111/ papr.12249
  • 11. Clinkscales CP, Greenfield ML, Vanarase M, Polley LS. An observational study of the relationship between lumbar epidural space depth and body mass index in Michigan parturients. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2007; 16: 323-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.03.015
  • 12. Ravi KK, Kaul TK, Kathuria S, Gupta S, Khurana S. Distance from skin to epidural space: correlation with body mass index (BMI). Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2011; 27: 39-42.
  • 13. Razavizadeh MR, Fazel MR, Mosavi M, Sehat M. The relationship between patients’ anthropometric characteristics and depth of spinal needle insertion. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 2016; 6: e24993. doi: 10.5812/aapm.24993
  • 14. Segal S, Beach M, Eappen S. A multivariate model to predict the distance from the skin to the epidural space in an obstetric population. Regional Anesthesia 1996; 21: 451-455.
  • 15. Sharma V, Swinson AK, Hughes C, Mokashi S, Russell R. Effect of ethnicity and body mass index on the distance from skin to lumbar epidural space in parturients. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 907-912. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06812.x
  • 16. Tran D, Kamani AA, Lessoway VA, Peterson C, Hor KW et al. Preinsertion paramedian ultrasound guidance for epidural anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009; 109: 661-667. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a94c75
  • 17. Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009; 108: 1876- 1881. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a323f6
  • 18. Sahota JS, Carvalho JC, Balki M, Fanning N, Arzola C. Ultrasound estimates for midline epidural punctures in the obese parturient: paramedian sagittal oblique is comparable to TM. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2013; 116: 829-835. doi: 10.1213/ ANE.0b013e31827f55f0