Jale KARAKAYA, Hatice ÇETİN, Nezire KÖSE, Sevil BİLGİN, Haluk TEKERLEK, Esra DÜLGER, Ceyhun TÜRKMEN

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

Background/aim: The Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire (ProFitMap-neck) is a reliable and valid assessment instrumentfor measuring neck-related symptoms and functional limitations in people with neck pain, but a Turkish version of it had not beenpublished. The purpose of this study was to investigate the adaptation, validity, and intrarater reliability of the Turkish version of theProFitMap-neck.Materials and methods: Two hundred and thirty-five individuals with chronic neck pain were enrolled in the study. Intrarater reliabilitywas assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for internal consistency. For concurrentvalidity, ProFitMap-neck scores were compared with neck disability index (NDI) and visual analoguepain scale (VAS) scores usingPearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. The ProFitMap-neck, NDI, VAS, and short form health survey (SF-36) were administered toall participants.Results: For intrarater analysis, ICC ranged between 0.72 and 0.84. The total score was 0.83, indicating excellent reliability. Thecorrelation of the ProFitMap-neck with NDI and VAS was 0.71 and 0.68, respectively, indicating good concurrent validity.Conclusion: The ProFitMap-neck is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity and reliability to be used for evaluating Turkishpatients with neck pain. Use of this scale can reveal how, how often, and how much these patients’ pain affects their symptoms andfunctional activities.

PDF

___

1. Miyamoto GC, Lin C-WC, Cabral CMN, Van Dongen JM, Van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2019; 53 (3): 172-181. doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2017-098765
2. Genebra CVDS, Maciel NM, Bento TPF, Simeão SFAP, De Vitta A. Prevalence and factors associated with neck pain: a population-based study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2017; 21 (4): 274-280. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.005
3. Nijs J, Leysen L, Vanlauwe J, Logghe T, Ickmans K et al. Treatment of central sensitization in patients with chronic pain: time for change? Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2019; 20 (16): 1961-1970. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1647166
4. Crofford LJ. Chronic pain: where the body meets the brain. Transactions of the American Clinical Climatological Association 2015; 126: 167-183.
5. Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Laimi K. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory. Disability and Rehabilitation 2018; 40 (18): 2116-2121. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1325945
6. Wiitavaara B, Björklund M, Brulin C, Djupsjöbacka M. How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009; 9: 10- 30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-30
7. Peterson DB. International classification of functioning, disability and health: an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology 2005; 50 (2): 105. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.105
8. Xu Y, Wang Y, Chen J, He Y, Zeng Q et al. The comorbidity of mental and physical disorders with self-reported chronic back or neck pain: results from the China mental health survey. Journal of Affective Disorders 2020; 260: 334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.089
9. Vargus-Adams JN, Majnemer A. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a framework for change: revolutionizing rehabilitation. Journal of Child Neurology 2014; 29 (8): 1030-1035. doi: 10.1177/0883073814533595
10. Hoving JL, O’leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 2003; 10 (3): 273-281. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00406-2
11. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39 (5): 400-417. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2930
12. Björklund M, Hamberg J, Heiden M, Barnekow-Bergkvist M. The ProFitMap-neck–reliability and validity of a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain. Disability and Rehabilitation 2012; 34 (13): 1096-1107. doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.635747
13. Kose G, Hepguler S, Atamaz F, Oder G. A comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2007; 39 (5): 358-362. doi:10.2340/16501977-0060
14. Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disability and Rehabilitation 2018; 40 (19): 2227- 2235. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1334096
15. Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics 2002; 25 (3): 141-148. doi: 10.1067/ mmt.2002.123333
16. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1991; 14 (7): 409-415.
17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25 (24): 3186-3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
18. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 11 (Suppl 1): S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17
19. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine 2009; 34 (16): 1732-1735. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac9055
20. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short‐form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf‐mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form‐36 bodily pain scale (sf‐36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care and Research 2011; 63 (S11): S240- 252. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543
21. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30 (6): 473-483.
22. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. British Medical Journal 1993; 306 (6890): 1437-1440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437
23. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. The Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 2005; 19 (1): 231-240. doi: 10.1519/15184.1
24. Gunaydin G, Citaker S, Meray J, Cobanoglu G, Gunaydin OE et al. Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bournemouth questionnaire. Spine 2016; 41 (21): E1292-E1297. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001599
25. Ferreira MC, Björklund M, Dach F, Chaves TC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the profile fitness mapping neck questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese: internal consistency, reliability, and construct and structural validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2017; 40 (3): 176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.004
26. Miyamoto GC, Lin C-WC, Cabral CMN, Van Dongen JM, Van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2019; 53 (3): 172-181. doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2017-098765