Aliye TOSUN, Ümit Seçil DEMİRDAL, Ayhan AŞKIN, Korhan Barış BAYRAM, Emel ATAR, Çiğdem ARİFOĞLU KARAMAN, Ece GÜVENDİ

The evaluation of cervical spinal angle in patients with acute and chronic neck pain

Background/aim: Clinicians associate the changes in cervical lordosis with neck pain, but there is no clear consensus on this. We aimed to investigate the relationships of cervical angles, neck pain, disability, and the psychological status of the patients with acute and chronic neck pain. Materials and methods: A total of 110 patients with neck pain were included in this study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. The lordosis angle was determined by the posterior tangent method. A visual analog scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale were administered to all patients. Results: The mean cervical lordosis angle was 23.10 ± 8.07 degrees. A statistically negative correlation was detected between cervical angle and duration of disease (P < 0.05). The cervical angle of the acute neck pain group was higher than that of the chronic pain group (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the acute and chronic neck pain groups with respect to VAS, NDI, and HAD scores (P > 0.05). Conclusion: We found that the cervical angle was significantly lower in chronic neck pain patients when compared to acute patients, and patients with higher pain scores had more severe disability and that disability increased with the duration of disease.

PDF

___

1. US Burden of Disease Collaborators. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 2013; 310: 591-608.
2. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 834-848.
3. Yang H, Haldeman S, Nakata A, Choi B, Delp L, Baker D. Work-related risk factors for neck pain in the US working population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40: 184-192.
4. Gore D, Sepic S, Gardner G. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 1986; 11: 521- 524.
5. Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF. The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 669-678.
6. Kaiser JA, Holland BA. Imaging of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 2701-2712.
7. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2072-2078.
8. Helliwell PS, Evans PF, Wright V. The straight cervical spine: does it indicate muscle spasm? J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76: 103- 106.
9. McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B. Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28: 187- 193.
10. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 1997; 22: 1472-1480.
11. Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Cailliet R, Ferrantelli JR, Haas JW, Holland B. Modeling of the sagittal cervical spine as a method to discriminate hypolordosis: results of elliptical and circular modeling in 72 asymptomatic subjects, 52 acute neck pain subjects, and 70 chronic neck pain subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 2485-2492.
12. Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10-cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981; 40: 87-89.
13. Zigmond AS, Snaith PR. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370.
14. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagly N. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine 2008; 33: 362-365.
15. Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Murphy DJ. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996; 19: 398-405.
16. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, Nakamura M, Nishizawa T, Toyama Y. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. J Neurosurg 2003; 99: 80-83.
17. Owens E, Hoiris K. Cervical curvature assessment using digitized radiographic analysis. Chiropr Res J 1990; 4: 47-62.
18. Wiegand R, Kettner NW, Brahee D, Marquina N. Cervical spine geometry correlated to cervical degenerative disease in a symptomatic group. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003; 26: 341- 346.
19. Erkan S, Yercan HS, Okcu G, Ozalp RT. The influence of sagittal cervical profile, gender and age on the thoracic kyphosis. Acta Orthop Belg 2010; 76: 675-680.
20. Beltsios M, Savvidou O, Mitsiokapa EA, Mavrogenis AF, Kaspiris A, Efstathopoulos N, Papagelopoulos PJ. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after neck injury. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23: 47-51.
21. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T. Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 1492-1498.
22. Kumagai G, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Inoue R, Iwasaki H, Iwane K, Matsuzaka M, Takahashi I, Umeda T et al. Association between roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine and neck symptoms in a Japanese community population. J Orthop Sci 2014; 19: 390-397.