The effect of stretcher type on safety and ease of treatment in an emergency department
Stretchers are frequently used to transport patients in the emergency department. Safety and comfort of the stretcher are important factors for the staff and patients. The present study investigated the effect of stretcher type on patient safety and treatment in an emergency department. Materials and methods: Doctors, nurses, interns, emergency medical technicians, and patient caregivers at the Abant İzzet Baysal University Medical Faculty Hospital emergency department completed a questionnaire on stretcher safety and comfort. Six stretchers were classical (group A), 6 had new technological specifications (group B), and 6 stretchers in group C were similar to those in group B in terms of technological specifications but were more expensive. Results: A total of 139 questionnaires were completed between 15 January and 29 February 2012 (group A: 42; group B: 66; group C: 31). We found statistically significant differences in ratings between group A and groups B and C (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found between groups B and C (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The safety and comfort of stretchers with satisfactory ergonomics and moderate cost are similar to those of higher-priced stretchers.
The effect of stretcher type on safety and ease of treatment in an emergency department
Stretchers are frequently used to transport patients in the emergency department. Safety and comfort of the stretcher are important factors for the staff and patients. The present study investigated the effect of stretcher type on patient safety and treatment in an emergency department. Materials and methods: Doctors, nurses, interns, emergency medical technicians, and patient caregivers at the Abant İzzet Baysal University Medical Faculty Hospital emergency department completed a questionnaire on stretcher safety and comfort. Six stretchers were classical (group A), 6 had new technological specifications (group B), and 6 stretchers in group C were similar to those in group B in terms of technological specifications but were more expensive. Results: A total of 139 questionnaires were completed between 15 January and 29 February 2012 (group A: 42; group B: 66; group C: 31). We found statistically significant differences in ratings between group A and groups B and C (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found between groups B and C (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The safety and comfort of stretchers with satisfactory ergonomics and moderate cost are similar to those of higher-priced stretchers.
___
- Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman JM, Schears RM, Bookman KJ. Emergency department crowding: concepts, causes, effects and solutions. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53: 612–7.
- Patterson PD, Huang DT, Fairbanks RJ, Simeone S, Weaver M, Wang HE. Variation in emergency medical services workplace safety culture. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14: 448–60.
- Boudreaux ED, Mandry CV, Wood K. Patient satisfaction data as a quality indicator: a tale of two emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 261–8.
- Hogston R. Quality nursing care: a qualitative enquiry. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21: 116–24.
- Jakobsson L, Hallberg RI, Loven L, Ottoson B. Patient satisfaction with nursing care evaluation before and after cutback in expenditure and intervention at a surgical clinic. Int J Qual Health Care 1994; 6: 361–9.
- Al B, Yıldırım C, Togun İ, Zengin S, Bozkurt S, Köse A, Sohbet R. Acil serviste hasta memnuniyetini etkileyen faktörler. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2009; 8: 39–44.
- Ohashi K, Kurihara Y, Watanabe K, Ohno-Machado L, Tanaka H. Feasibility evaluation of Smart Stretcher to improve patient safety during transfers. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 253–64.
- Saiboon I, Eng HS, Krishnan B, Ali SN, Murad N, Pathnathani A, Choy CY. Study of patients’ satisfaction with the emergency department (ED) of Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (HUKM). Med & Health 2008; 3: 7–13.
- Del Rossi G, Rechtine GR, Conrad BP, Horodyski M. Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients? Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 751–6.