Özgür ÇAKIR, Can AKSU

Subcapsular local anesthesia approach in percutaneous liver biopsy: less pain, more comfort

Background/aim: To compare the subjective level of pain in patients who underwent an ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) after either pericapsular anesthesia (PA) or subcapsular anesthesia (SA), based on the numeric rating scale (NRS). Materials and methods: A total of 323 patients, mean age 51, range 21–82 years; 160 (49.5%) male, referred to the Interventional Radiology Clinic of Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine for image-guided PLB, between June 2019 and May 2020 were included and randomized into two groups by anesthetic type; the first (n = 171) consisted of patients undergoing SA while the second (n = 152) included patients undergoing PA. The intensity of pain at 0, 1, and 6 h after PLB was evaluated between the groups using NRS. Results: At hours 0, 1, and 6, the median [range] NRS scores in the subcapsular and pericapsular groups were 2 [1–2] versus 3 [2–4] (P < 0.001), 1 [0–1] versus 1 [1–2] (P < 0.001), and 0 [0–0] versus 1 [0–1] (P < 0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the patients who underwent the subcostal procedure with subcapsular anesthesia reported the lowest pain scores and intercostal procedure with pericapsular anesthesia reported the worst pain scores for each time point: 0 h 1 [1–2] versus 3 [3–4], P < 0.001; 1 h 1 [0–1] versus 1 [1–2], P < 0.001; and 6 h 0 [0–0] versus 0 [0–1], P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion: Subcapsular anesthesia is a well-tolerated procedure compared to a pericapsular procedure. Furthermore, the application of a subcapsular anesthetic with a subcostal approach was reported to result in the lowest pain and greatest patient comfort.Key words: Biopsy, liver, pain, local anesthesia

PDF

___

1. Perrillo RP. The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997; 26 (3): 575-635. doi: 10.1002/hep.510260710
2. Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F. Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. Hepatology 2000; 32(3): 477-481. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.16602
3. Pezeshki Rad M, Abbasi B, Morovatdar N, Sadeghi M, Hashemi K. Pain in percutaneous liver core-needle biopsy: a randomized trial comparing the intercostal and subcostal approaches. Abdominal Radiology 2019; 44 (1): 286-291. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1704-z
4. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Journal of Hepatology 2001; 35 (3): 421-430. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(01)00130-1
5. Seeff LB, Everson GT, Morgan TR, Curto T, Lee W et al. Complication rate of percutaneous liver biopsies among persons with advanced chronic liver disease in the HALT-C trial. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2010; 8 (10): 877-883. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.025
6. Eisenberg E, Konopniki M, Veitsman E, Kramskay R, Gaitini D et al. Prevalence and characteristics of pain induced by percutaneous liver biopsy. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96 (5): 1932-1996. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000060453.74744.17
7. Tan KT, Rajan DK, Kachura JR, Hayeems E, Simons ME et al. Pain after percutaneous liver biopsy for diffuse hepatic disease: A randomized trial comparing subcostal and intercostal approaches. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2005; 16 (9): 1215-1219. doi: 10.1097/01. RVI.0000173282.14018.79
8. Tublin ME, Blair R, Martin J, Malik S, Ruppert K, Demetris A. Prospective study of the impact of liver biopsy core size on specimen adequacy and procedural complications. American Journal of Roentgenology 2018; 210 (1):183-188. doi: 10.2214/ AJR.17.17792
9. Kim JW, Shin SS. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of abdominal viscera: tips to ensure safe and effective biopsy. Korean Journal of Radiology 2017; 18 (2): 309-322. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.309
10. Vijayaraghavan G, Sheehan D, Myriam BA, Sarwat H. Imagingguided parenchymal liver biopsy: how we do it. Journal of Clinical Imaging and Science 2011; 1: 30. doi: 10.4103/2156- 7514.82082
11. Breivik EK, Björnsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clinical Journal of Pain 2000; 16 (1): 22-28. doi: 10.1097/00002508- 200003000-00005
12. Saadeh S, Cammell G, Carey WD, Younossi Z, Barnes D et al. The role of liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2001; 33 (1): 1996-200. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.20534
13. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2015; 65 (12): 87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
14. Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, Bianchi L, Solé M et al. diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of the non-invasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008; 47 (2): 97-104. doi: 10.1002/hep.22206
15. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirin B, Abecassis M et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018; 67 (1): 358-380. doi: 10.1002/ hep.29086
16. Janes CH, Lindor KD. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 118 (2): 96-98. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-2- 199301150-00003
17. Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ, Taylor WF. Liver biopsy: complications in 1000 inpatients and outpatients. Gastroenterology 1978; 74 (1): 103-106. doi: 10.1016/0016- 5085(78)90364-5
is better. Hepatology 2003; 38 (6): 1356-1358. doi: 10.1053/ jhep.2003.10010
19. Riley TR. Predictors of pain medication use after percutaneous liver biopsy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2002; 47 (10): 2151-2153. doi: 10.1023/A:1020110621854