Abidin Egemen İŞGÖREN, Ziya AKBULUT, Muhammet Fuat ÖZCAN, Ali Fuat ATMACA, Serkan ALTINOVA, Abdullah Erdem CANDA, Mevlana Derya BALBAY

Removing the specimen with traction during robotic radical prostatectomy does not cause a positive surgical margin

1. Wiezer AZ, Strope S, Wood DP. Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes? Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 210-214. 2. Hong H, Mel L, Taylor J, Wu Q, Reeves H. Effects of roboticassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens. Diagn Pathol 2012; 7: 24-30. 3. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 1-15. 4. Lowrance WT, Parekh DJ. The rapid uptake of robotic prostatectomy and its collateral effects. Cancer 2012; 118: 4-7. 5. Philippou P, Waine E, Rowe E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon. J Endourol 2012; 26: 1002-1008. 6. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high volume centers. J Endourol 2010; 24: 2003-2015. 7. Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 412-416. 8. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104: 534-539. 9. Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102: 28-32. 10. Laurila TA, Huang W, Jarrard DF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol Oncol 2009; 27: 529-533. 11. Williams SB, Chen MH, D Amico AV, Weinberg AC, Kacker R, Hirsch MS, Richie JP, Hu JC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010; 76: 1097-1101. 12. Cathcart P, Murphy DG, Moon D, Costello AJ, Frydenberg M. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australia. BJU Int 2011; 107: 11-19. 13. Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1956-1962. 14. Özkanlı SŞ, Zemheri IE, Yıldırım A, Gür HD, Balbay MD, Şenol S, Özkanlı AO, Alkan E, Zenginkinet T, Aydın A et al. Gleason score at the margin can predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in addition to preoperative PSA and surgical margin status. Turk J Med Sci 2013; 44: 397-403.

PDF

___

1. Wiezer AZ, Strope S, Wood DP. Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes? Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 210-214.
2. Hong H, Mel L, Taylor J, Wu Q, Reeves H. Effects of roboticassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens. Diagn Pathol 2012; 7: 24-30.
3. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 1-15.
4. Lowrance WT, Parekh DJ. The rapid uptake of robotic prostatectomy and its collateral effects. Cancer 2012; 118: 4-7.
5. Philippou P, Waine E, Rowe E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon. J Endourol 2012; 26: 1002-1008.
6. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, Orvieto MA, Chauhan S, Ficarra V, Melegari S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high volume centers. J Endourol 2010; 24: 2003-2015.
7. Parsons JK, Bennett JL. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 412-416.
8. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, DElia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104: 534-539.
9. Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102: 28-32.
10. Laurila TA, Huang W, Jarrard DF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Urol Oncol 2009; 27: 529-533.
11. Williams SB, Chen MH, DAmico AV, Weinberg AC, Kacker R, Hirsch MS, Richie JP, Hu JC. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010; 76: 1097-1101.
12. Cathcart P, Murphy DG, Moon D, Costello AJ, Frydenberg M. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australia. BJU Int 2011; 107: 11-19.
13. Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1956-1962.
14. Özkanlı SŞ, Zemheri IE, Yıldırım A, Gür HD, Balbay MD, Şenol S, Özkanlı AO, Alkan E, Zenginkinet T, Aydın A et al. Gleason score at the margin can predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in addition to preoperative PSA and surgical margin status. Turk J Med Sci 2013; 44: 397-403.