Peng YAN, Xingyue ZHENG, Erling WANG, Xiaoqian GUO, Chan GU, Zhongrui YAN, Shan LI, Chuanqiang QU, Xiyun RUAN, Jifeng LI

Predictive values of carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for large embolus shedding in carotid artery stenting

Background/aim: Embolus shedding is one of the important complications in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) is often used to directly reflect important biological characteristics, such as plaque size and composition, as well as the structure of the carotid artery wall. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive values of carotid HR-MRI for large embolus shedding in CAS. Materials and methods: In total, 195 patients with carotid stenosis were enrolled. Preoperative carotid HR-MRI was performed to define the nature of the carotid plaques. CAS was performed in all patients, and intraoperative embolic protection devices were used to collect the shed emboli. According to the diameter and number of shed emboli, the patients were divided into the small-embolus group (group X) and largeembolus group (group Y). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of large embolus shedding. Results: Group Y included 58 patients, and group X included 137 patients. Age, stenosis length, smoking, and ≥3 transient cerebral ischemic attacks were risk factors for large embolusshedding. Two cases of shed large emboli developed from stable plaques, and 56 cases of large emboli developed from vulnerable plaques. When vulnerable plaques were associated with more risk factors, the incidences of large embolus shedding in cases with vulnerable plaques combined with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors were 44 % (4/9), 68.1% (15/22), 72.2% (13/18), 76.5% (13/17), and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Conclusion: Carotid HR-MRI can predict the incidence of large embolus shedding in CAS.

PDF

___

1. Kazmierski MK. Stenosis of carotid arteries. Wiadomości Lekarskie 2003; 56 (5-6): 260-265.
2. Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T, Beebe HG, Bell PR et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001; 33 (2 Suppl): S111-S116. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111665
3. Lian X, Liu W, Li M, Lin M, Zhu S et al. Risk factors and complications associated with difficult retrieval of embolic protection devices in carotid artery stenting. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2012; 35 (1): 43-48. doi: 10.1007/s00270- 011-0117-y
4. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 363 (5): 11- 23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321
5. Chung J, Shin YS, Lim YC, Park SK. The clinical outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2009; 45 (6): 350-354. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.45.6.350
6. Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Liso A, Oshola K et al. Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 2002; 9: 786-792. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900611
7. Hsu N, Wang T, Friedman O, Barjaktarevic I. Medical Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Beyond Anticoagulation. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2017; 20 (3): 152-161. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.07.004
8. Reimers B, Corvaja N, Moshiri S, Saccà S, Albiero R et al. Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation 2001; 104 (1): 12-15. doi: 10.1161/hc2601.092495
9. Wu YM, Wong HF, Chen YL, Wong MC, Toh CH. Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device. Acta Cardiologica 2011; 66 (4): 453-458.doi: 10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593
10. Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J et al . Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2003; 34 (3): 813-819. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000058160.53040.5F
11. Degnan AJ, Young VE, Gillard JH. Advances in noninvasive imaging for evaluating clinical risk and guiding therapy in carotid atherosclerosis. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2012; 10 (1): 37-53. doi: 10.1586/erc.11.168
12. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators, Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Sackett DL et al. Beneficial effect of carotid endanercctomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 325 (7): 445-453. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701
13. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 125: e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046
14. Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1996; 23 (5):. doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70237- 9
15. Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikucki SA, McKinsey JF, Piano G et al.. Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 1997; 26 (4): 585-594. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70056-9
16. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Gold HK et al. Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2005; 25: 2054-2061.doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000178991.71605.18
17. Mofidi R, Crotty TB, McCarthy P, Sheehan SJ, Mehigan D et al. Association between plaque instability, angiogenesis and symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. British Journal of Surgery 2001; 88: 945-950. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01823.x
18. Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, Takaya N, Xu D et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2005; 25: 234-239.doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000149867.61851.31
19. Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Polissar NL, Chu B et al. Differentiation of intraplaque versus juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus in advanced human carotid atherosclerotic lesions by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004; 110 (20): 3239-3244. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147287.23741.9A
20. Singh N, Moody AR, Roifman I, Bluemke DA, Zavodni AE. Advanced MRI for carotid plaque imaging. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016; 32 (1): 83-89. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0743-6
21. Serrador JM, Picot PA, Rutt BK, Shoemaker JK, Bondar RL. MRI measures of middle cerebral artery diameter in conscious humans during simulated orthostasis. Stroke 2000; 31 (7): 1672-1678. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.7.1672
22. Esposito-Bauer L, Saam T, Ghodrati I, Pelisek J, Heider P et al. MRI plaque imaging detects carotid plaques with a high risk for future cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic patients. PLoS One 2013; 8 (7): e67927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067927
23. Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, Saam T, Underhill H et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI-initial results. Stroke 2006; 37 (3): 818-823. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91
24. Gröschel K, Ernemann U, Schnaudigel S, Wasser K, Nägele T et al. A risk score to predict ischemic lesions after protected carotid artery stenting. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2008; 273 (1- 2): 112-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.07.004
25. Sayeed S, Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, Makaroun MS. Angiographic lesion characteristics can predict adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2008; 47 (1): 81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.047
26. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Stolzmann P, Liess C, Hedderich J, Paulsen F et al. Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries. Radiology 2005; 235 (2): 454-460. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352031968
27. Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Setacci F, Setacci C, Castriota F. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke 2003; 34 (8): 1936-1941. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61
28. Shilling K, Uretsky BF, Hunter GC. Entrapment of a cerebral embolic protection device-a case report. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2006; 40 (3): 229-233. doi: 10.1177/153857440604000308