Optimum recording time of routine electroencephalogram for adults with epilepsy

Background/aim: This study aimed to reveal the optimum recording time of routine electroencephalogram (EEG) for adults withepilepsy.Materials and methods: In this clinical observational study we investigated features of paroxysms that emerged in EEGs recorded for45 min in adults with epilepsy.Results: Paroxysms were detected in 38.14% of 97 patients. The probability of occurrence of paroxysm during the first 10 min wasfound to be statistically significantly low in comparison to the first 30 and 45 min (respectively P = 0.004, P = 0.0001). This probabilitywas found to increase insignificantly when comparing the first 20 min with the first 30 min (P = 0.125), but it increased significantly incomparison to 45 min (P = 0.008). On the other hand, this probability was found to increase insignificantly when comparing the first 30min with the first 45 min (P = 0.125). The cutoff point to specify the existence of interictal epileptiform discharges in the ROC analysiswas found to be ≤39 min (95% CI: 0.958–1.000), and 90% of interictal epileptiform discharges were revealed during the first 30 min ofEEG recording.Conclusion: The recording time of routine EEGs for adults with epilepsy should not be less 30 min.

PDF

___

1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 1: Minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 2006; 23: 86-91.
2. Flink R, Pedersen B, Guekht AB, Malmgren K, Michelucci R et al. Commission of European Affairs of the International League Against Epilepsy: Subcommission on European Guidelines. Guidelines for the use of EEG methodology in the diagnosis of epilepsy: International League Against Epilepsy: Commission report: Commission on European Affairs: Sub-commission on European Guidelines. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2002; 106: 1-7.
3. Kane N, Acharya J, Benickzy S, Caboclo L, Finnigan S et al. A revised glossary of terms most commonly used by clinical electroencephalographers and updated proposal for the report format of the EEG findings. Revision 2017. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice 2017; 2: 170-185. doi: 10.1016/j. cnp.2017.07.002
4. Burkholder DB, Britton JW, Rajasekaran V, Fabris RR, Cherian PJ et al. Routine vs extended outpatient EEG for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges. Neurology 2016; 86: 1524-1530. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002592
5. Theitler J, Dassa D, Gelernter I, Gandelman-Marton R. Is it time for individualized testing in the electroencephalogram (EEG) laboratory? European Journal of Neurology 2016; 23: 1477-1481. doi: 10.1111/ene.13065
6. Meritam P, Gardella E, Alving J, Terney D, Hribljan MC et al. Diagnostic yield of standard-wake and sleep EEG recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology 2018; 129: 713-716. doi: 10.1016/j. clinph.2018.01.056
7. Faulkner H, Arima H, Mohamed A. Latency to first interictal epileptiform discharge in epilepsy with outpatient ambulatory EEG. Clinical Neurophysiology 2012; 123: 1732-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.023
8. Werhahn KJ, Hartl E, Hamann K, Breimhorst M, Noachtar S. Latency of interictal epileptiform discharges in long-term EEG recordings in epilepsy patients. Seizure 2015; 29: 20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.012