Opinions of the Turkish population on cancer and being informed of the diagnosis of cancer

Background/aim: An opinion survey was conducted to investigate the opinions and attitudes of the Turkish population regarding cancer if they or one of their family members were to receive a diagnosis of cancer. Materials and methods: The opinion survey was completed by 6566 subjects and consisted of questions about the demographics of the participants and their overall opinions about cancer. The other points of the investigation asked whether they would inform relatives who had cancer about the diagnosis and whether they would prefer to be informed if they were the one with the cancer diagnosis. Results: The median age of the participants was 33 years (range: 18?100) and 53.3% were male. It was found that 57.7% of the participants would prefer not to disclose a cancer diagnosis to their first-degree relatives. The diagnosis had been disclosed to relatives with cancer in 69.9% of cases. When asked about their overall opinion of cancer management, 76.5% of participants were optimistic, 16.3% were pessimistic, and 2.9% had mixed opinions. Conclusion: This study represents one of the largest surveys done in Turkey to identify the thoughts of healthy people about cancer and their opinion on informing their relatives about the diagnosis if the relatives have cancer. It is comparable with reports from East Europe and Asian countries.

Opinions of the Turkish population on cancer and being informed of the diagnosis of cancer

Background/aim: An opinion survey was conducted to investigate the opinions and attitudes of the Turkish population regarding cancer if they or one of their family members were to receive a diagnosis of cancer. Materials and methods: The opinion survey was completed by 6566 subjects and consisted of questions about the demographics of the participants and their overall opinions about cancer. The other points of the investigation asked whether they would inform relatives who had cancer about the diagnosis and whether they would prefer to be informed if they were the one with the cancer diagnosis. Results: The median age of the participants was 33 years (range: 18?100) and 53.3% were male. It was found that 57.7% of the participants would prefer not to disclose a cancer diagnosis to their first-degree relatives. The diagnosis had been disclosed to relatives with cancer in 69.9% of cases. When asked about their overall opinion of cancer management, 76.5% of participants were optimistic, 16.3% were pessimistic, and 2.9% had mixed opinions. Conclusion: This study represents one of the largest surveys done in Turkey to identify the thoughts of healthy people about cancer and their opinion on informing their relatives about the diagnosis if the relatives have cancer. It is comparable with reports from East Europe and Asian countries.

___

  • World Health Organization. NCD Country Profiles, 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011. 5. Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW. Breaking bad news. 1: Current best advice for clinicians. Behav Med 1998; 24: 53–59. 6. Jackson J. Telling the truth. J Med Ethics 1991; 17: 5–9.
  • Grassi L, Gritti P, Rigatelli M, Gala C. Psychosocial problems secondary to cancer: an Italian multicentre survey of consultation-liaison psychiatry in oncology. Italian Consultation-Liaison Group. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 579–585. 8. Williams JR. Physicians and patients. In: Williams, JR. Medical Ethics Manual. 2nd ed. London, UK: World Medical Association; 2009. pp. 34–61.
  • Singleton J, McLaren S. Ethical Foundations of Health Care: Responsibilities in Decision Making. London, UK: Mosby; 1995.
  • Ruhnke GW, Wilson SR, Akamatsu T, Kinoue T, Takashima Y, Goldstein MK, Koenig BA, Hornberger JC, Raffin, TA. Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Chest 2000; 118: 1172–1182.
  • Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hytten K. Disclosing the cancer diagnosis: the patients’ experiences. Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 878–882.
  • Ateşci FÇ, Oğuzhanoğlu NK, Baltalarli B, Karadağ F, Özdel O, Karagöz N. Psychiatric disorders in cancer patients and associated factors. Turk J Psychiatry 2003; 14: 145–152 (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Devrimci H, Ünlüoğlu G. Kanser hastaları ve yakınlarında psikiyatrik morbidite. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 1998; 6: 196–206 (in Turkish).
  • Ersoy MA. Kanser hastalarında inkar, bilgilendirilme, alternatif tedavi yöntemlerine başvurma ve depresyon ilişkisinin incelenmesi. 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 2000; 8: 17–26 (in Turkish).
  • Ozdogan M, Samur M, Bozcuk HS, Coban E, Artac M, Savas B, Kara A, Topcu Z, Sualp Z. “Do not tell”: what factors affect relatives’ attitudes to honest disclosure of diagnosis to cancer patients? Support Care Cancer 2004; 12: 497–502.
  • Ozdogan M, Samur M, Artac M, Yildiz M, Savas B, Bozcuk HS. Factors related to truth-telling practice of physicians treating patients with cancer in Turkey. J Pal Med 2006; 9: 1114–1119.
  • Özsunay E. Symposium on the Doctor’s Duty of Informing the Patient in German and Turkish Law, the Exceptions, and New Developments in Responsibility Law. İstanbul, Turkey; 1983.
  • Tattersall MH, Gattellari M, Voigt K, Butow PN. When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately? Support Care Cancer 2002; 10: 314–321.
  • Asai A. Should physicians tell patients the truth? West J Med 1995; 163: 36–39.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of children presenting to the emergency room after electrical injury

ASLIHAN ARASLI YILMAZ, ALİ OSMAN KÖKSAL, OSMAN ÖZDEMİR, MEHTAP ACAR, GÜLTEN KÜÇÜKKONYALI, YASEMİN İNAN, SİBEL ÇELİK, MİNE GÜVELOĞLU, NESİBE ANDIRAN, SACİT GÜNBEY

Human papillomavirus: a potential risk factor for colorectal carcinoma?

Alpaslan TANOĞLU, Ahmet Ziya BALTA, Ufuk BERBER

Quantitative study of epigenetic signature in head >and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Ayesha UMAIR, Bassel TARAKJI, Alzoghaibi IBRAHIM, Azzeghaibi NASSER, Alenzi FQ, Ayesha SHREEN

Bioimpedance for assessing volume status in children with nephrotic syndrome

KADRİYE ÖZDEMİR, MAKBULE SEVGİ MİR, NİDA DİNÇEL, SİBEL BOZABALI, İPEK KAPLAN BULUT, EBRU YILMAZ, BETÜL SÖZERİ

Efect of keratinocyte growth factor on growth and transdiferentiation of primary alveolar epithelial type II cells

Yumei WU, Xiuxiang LIU, Zhichun FENG, Chunmei TIAN, Xiangyong KONG, Changjun LV

Surgical management of pulmonary aspergilloma: clinical experience with 77 cases

Koray AYDOĞDU, Funda İNCEKARA, Mehmet Furkan ŞAHİN, Selim Şakir Erkmen GÜLHAN, Göktürk FINDIK, Abdullah İrfan TAŞTEPE, Sadi KAYA

MEHMET SIRMALI, OKAN SOLAK, TALİP ÇEVİK, RANA SIRMALI, BÜNYAMİN ÖZAYDIN, ZEYNEP GİNİŞ, YETKİN AĞAÇKIRAN, NAMIK DELİBAŞ

The effects of atorvastatin on antioxidant/antiinflammatory properties of HDLs in hypercholesterolemics

GÜLŞEN AKALIN ÇİFTÇİ, İPEK ERTORUN, AYSEN AKALIN, İBRAHİM ÖZKAN ALATAŞ, AHMET MUSMUL

Protective effect of \beta-glucan on acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats

MERYEM IRAZ, MUSTAFA IRAZ, MUKADDES EŞREFOĞLU, MEHMET ŞERİF AYDIN

Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training on symptoms and uroflowmetry parameters in female patients with overactive bladder

Haluk KULAKSIZOĞLU, Murat AKAND, Evrim ÇAKMAKÇI, Murat GÜL, Bedreddin SEÇKİN