Is the management of Rh-Rh incompatibility with noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping for targeted prophylaxis cost-effective in the Turkish population?
Is the management of Rh-Rh incompatibility with noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping for targeted prophylaxis cost-effective in the Turkish population?
Background/aim: The aim of this study was to assess unnecessary immunization rates and compare the cost-effectiveness of targetedprophylaxis with fetal Rh genotyping with that of traditional management of Rh-Rh incompatibility in a virtual economic model.Materials and methods: This retrospective data analysis was conducted at two tertiary centers between 2011 and 2015. The data of 1135pregnant women were analyzed. The main outcome measure was to determine the unnecessary immunization rate among the wholeRh-Rh incompatibility group. The second outcome measure was to compare the cost-effectiveness of universal immunization with thatof targeted prophylaxis with fetal Rh genotyping in a virtual economic model.Results: Average cost per patient was found as $259.20 with universal prophylaxis and the total cost was $177,344, whereas if targetedprophylaxis had been applied to these patients the total cost would have been $263,392 and cost per patient would have been $385.Universal prophylaxis was more cost-effective than targeted prophylaxis in terms of both total cost and cost per patient (P < 0.0001).Conclusion: Unless the cost of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping is reduced, a universal approach of anti-D immune globulin prophylaxisis more cost-effective than noninvasive determination of fetal Rh genotyping with targeted prophylaxis.
___
- NICE. Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis for Women Who
Are Rhesus D Negative. London, UK: National Institute for
Health and Care Excellence, 2008.
- Alfirevic Z, Callaghan T. Anti-RhD prophylaxis for RhD
negative pregnant women. BMJ 2014; 349: 5437.
- Chitty LS, Finning K, Wade A, Soothill P, Martin B, Oxenford
K, Daniels G, Massey E. Diagnostic accuracy of routine
antenatal determination of fetal RHD status across gestation:
population based cohort study. BMJ 2014; 349: 1-7.
- Daniels G, Finning K, Martin P, Massey E. Non-invasive
prenatal diagnosis of fetal blood group phenotypes: current
practice and future prospects. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 101-107.
- Güneli T, Kalelioğlu I, Ermiş H, Aydınlı K. Detection of fetal
RhD gene from maternal blood. J Turkish-German Gynecol
Assoc 2010; 11: 82-85.
- Müller SP, Bartels I, Stein W, Emons G, Gutensohn K, Köhler
M, Legler TJ. The determination of the fetal D status from
maternal plasma for decision making on Rh prophylaxis is
feasible. Transfusion 2008; 48: 2292-2301.
- Finning K, Martin P, Summers J, Massey E, Poole G, Daniels
G. Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in
maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD
negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study. BMJ
2008; 336: 816-818.
- Geifman-Holtzman O, Grotegut CA, Gaughan JP. Diagnostic
accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal
blood–a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1163-
1173.
- Legler TJ, Muller SP, Haverkamp A, Grill S, Hahn S. Prenatal
RhD testing: a review of studies published from 2006 to 2008.
Transfus Med Hemother 2009; 36: 189-198.
- Van der Schoot CE, Soussan AA, Koelewijn J, Bonsel G, PagetChristiaens LG, de Haas M. Non-invasive antenatal RHD
typing. Transfus Clin Biol 2006; 13: 53-57.
- Tiblad E, Taune Wikman A, Ajne G, Blanck A, Jansson Y,
Karlsson A, Nordlander E, Holländer BS, Westgren M. Targeted
routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD
immunization--outcome of a new antenatal screening and
prevention program. PLoS One 2013; 8: e70984.
- Akın G, Dostbil N. Türkiye’de kan grubu araştırmaları. Ankara
Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 2005; 45:
1-15 (in Turkish).
- Touinssi M, Chiaroni J, Degioanni A, De Micco P, Dutour
O, Bauduer F. Distribution of rhesus blood group system in the
French Basques: a reappraisal using the allele-specific primers
PCR method. Hum Hered 2004; 58: 69-72.
- Hawk A, Chang E, Shields S, Simpson K. Costs and clinical
outcomes of noninvasive fetal RhD typing for targeted
prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 579-585.
- Duplantie J, Martinez Gonzales O, Bois A, Nshimyumukiza L,
Gekas J, Bujold E, Morin V, Vallée M, Giguère Y, Gagné C et al.
Cost-effectiveness of the management of Rh-negative pregnant
women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 730-740.
- Kenny-Walsh E. Clinical outcomes after hepatitis C infection
from contaminated anti-D immune globulin. Irish Hepatology
Research Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1228-1233.
- Aitken SL, Tichy EM. RhOD immune globulin products for
prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy. Am J
Health Syst Pharm 2015: 15; 72: 267-276.
- Millar CM, Connor N, Dolan G, Lee CA, Makris M, Wilde
J, Winter M, Ironside JW, Gill N, Hill FG. Risk reduction
strategies for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease transmission
by UK plasma products and their impact on patients with
inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 305-315.
- Minon JM, Gerard C, Senterre JM, Schaaps JP, Foidart JM.
Routine fetal RHD genotyping with maternal plasma: a fouryear experience in Belgium. Transfusion 2008; 48: 373-381.
- Hahn S, Chitty L. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: current
practice and future perspectives. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
2008; 3: 150-157.
- Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL,
Redman CW, Wainscoat JS. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal
plasma and serum. Lancet 1997; 350: 485-487.