Necmettin AKDENİZ, Abdullah DEMİRBAŞ, ÖMER FARUK ELMAS, Mehmet OKÇU

Handheld dermatoscopy as an easy-to-use capillaroscopic instrument in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study

Background/aim: Nailfold video capillaroscopy is considered as a reliable method for evaluating peripheral microangiopathy in rheumatologic diseases. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the utility of handheld dermatoscopy as an easy-to-use nailfold capillaroscopic instrument in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy subjects. A handheld dermatoscopic examination of proximal nail fold was performed in each subject. The possible correlation of capillaroscopic findings with disease activity was evaluated using the disease activity score 28 (DAS28). Results: A total of 59 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 60 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. The presence of capillary enlargement, avascular areas, capillary deformities, and capillary vascular anomalies in the group of patients showed a statistically significant difference when compared with the healthy subjects. No correlation was found between the nail fold capillaroscopic findings and DAS28 score. Conclusion: Hand-held dermatoscopy seems to be a useful technique in the evaluation of nail fold capillary changes. We suggest that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, when capillaroscopic examination is needed, it can be evaluated using handheld dermatoscopy. Selected patients who showed findings using this method can be further examined with classical capillaroscopy to obtain more quantitative data.

PDF

___

1. Dhawan SS, Quyyumi AA. Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease. Current Atherosclerosis Reports. 2008;10(2): 128-133. doi: 10.1007/s11883-008-0019-x
2. Heidari B. Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;2(1): 161-170.
3. Paleolog EM. The vasculature in rheumatoid arthritis: cause or consequence? International Journal of Experimental Pathology 2009; 90(3): 249-261. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00640.x
4. Young A, Koduri G. Extra-articular manifestations and complications of rheumatoid arthritis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2007; 21(5): 907-927. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.05.007
5. Kobak S. Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Turkish patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 165 patients. Clinical Rheumatology. 2011; 30(6): 843-847. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1678-5
6. Zaric D, Worm AM, Stahl D, Clemmensen O. Capillary microscopy of the nailfold in psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 1981; 10(3): 249-252. doi: 10.3109/03009748109095307
7. Hachulla E, Perez-Cousin M, Flipo R, Houvenagel E, Cardon T et al. Increased capillary permeability in systemic rheumatoid vasculitis: detection by dynamic fluorescence nailfold videomicroscopy. The Journal of Rheumatology. 1994; 21(7): 1197-1202.
8. Cutolo M, Sulli A, Smith V. How to perform and interpret capillaroscopy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 2013; 27(2): 237-248. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2013.03.001
9. Van Den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2013; 65(11): 2737-2747. doi: 10.1002/art.38098
10. Sulli A, Secchi ME, Pizzorni C, Cutolo M. Scoring the nailfold microvascular changes during the capillaroscopic analysis in systemic sclerosis patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2008; 67(6): 885-887. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.079756
11. Dinsdale G, Peytrignet S, Moore T, Berks M, Roberts C et al. The assessment of nailfold capillaries: comparison of dermoscopy and nailfold videocapillaroscopy. Rheumatology 2018; 57(6): 1115-1116. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key018
12. Graceffa D, Amorosi B, Maiani E, Bonifati C, Chimenti MS et al. Capillaroscopy in psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis: a useful tool for differential diagnosis. Arthritis 2013; 2013: 957480. doi: 10.1155/2013/957480
13. Lambova SN, Hermann W, Müller-Ladner U. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analysis of capillaroscopic findings in patients with rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology International. 2012; 32(12): 3729-3735. doi: 10.1007/s00296- 011-2222-2
14. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2010; 62(9): 2569-2581. doi: 10.1002/art.27584
15. Prevoo M, Van’T Hof MA, Kuper H, Van Leeuwen M, Van De Putte L et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty‐ eight‐joint counts development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology 1995; 38(1): 44-48. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107
16. Bergman R, Sharony L, Schapira D, Nahir MA, Balbir-Gurman A. The handheld dermatoscope as a nail-fold capillaroscopic instrument. Archives of Dermatology 2003; 139(8): 1027-1030. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.8.1027
17. Tabanlioglu-Onan D, İncel-Uysal P, Hayran Y, Şahin-Dalgiç G, Hayran M et al. Dermatoscopic assessment of nailfold capillary abnormalities in Behçet’s disease and correlation of the findings with disease activity and severity. Dermatologica Sinica 2019; 37(1): 40-45. doi: 10.4103/ds.ds_10_18
18. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365(23): 2205-2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965
19. Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Klimiuk PA, Sierakowski S, Ciolkiewicz M. A study on vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelin-1 in patients with extra-articular involvement of rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rheumatology. 2006; 25(3): 314-319. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-0007-2
20. Mitchell DM, Spitz PW, Young DY, Bloch DA, McShane DJ et al. Survival, prognosis, and causes of death in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology 1986; 29(6):706-714. doi: 10.1002/ art.1780290602
21. Scott D, Bacon P, Tribe C. Systemic rheumatoid vasculitis: a clinical and laboratory study of 50 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1981; 60(4): 288-297.
22. Sekiyama JY, Camargo CZ, Eduardo L, Andrade C, Kayser C. Reliability of widefieldnailfoldcapillaroscopyand video capillaroscopy in theassessment of patientswithRaynaud’spheno menon. ArthritisCareRes (Hoboken) 2013; 65 (11): 1853-1861. doi: 10.1002/acr.22054 23. Dinsdale G, Moore T, O’Leary N, Tresadern P, Berks M et al. Intra-andinter-observerreliability of nailfoldvideocapillaroscopy - A possibleoutcomemeasureforsystemicsclerosis-related microangiopathy. Microvasc Res 2017; 112: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j. mvr.2017.02.001
24. Rajaei A, Dehghan P, Amiri A. Nailfold capillaroscopy in 430 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine 2017; 8(4): 269-274. doi: 10.22088/cjim.8.4.269
25. Altomonte L, Zoli A, Galossi A, Mirone L, Tulli A et al. Microvascular capillaroscopic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 1995; 13(1): 83-86.
26. Lin KM, Cheng TT, Chen CJ. Clinical applications of nailfold capillaroscopy in different rheumatic diseases. J Intern Med Taiwan 2009; 20: 238-247.
27. Sag S, Sag MS, Tekeoglu I, Kamanli A, Nas K et al. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rheumatology 2017; 36(9): 1969-1974. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3696-4
28. Errichetti E, Zabotti A, Stinco G, Quartuccio L, Sacco S et al. Dermoscopy of nail fold and elbow in the differential diagnosis of early psoriatic arthritis sine psoriasis and early rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Dermatology 2016;43(10): 1217-1220. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13438
29. Zabotti A, Errichetti E, Zuliani F, Quartuccio L, Sacco S et al. Early psoriatic arthritis versus early seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: role of dermoscopy combined with ultrasonography for differential diagnosis. The Journal of Rheumatology 2018; 45(5): 648-654. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.17096