Ali Timuçin ATAYOĞLU, Sibel SİLİCİ, Neriman İNANÇ, Meltem SOYLU

Glycemic index values of monofloral Turkish honeys and the effect oftheir consumption on glucose metabolism

Background/aim: Clinical trials have shown that low glycemic index (GI) nutrition reduces mean blood glucose concentrations and insulin secretions. The aim of the present study was to determine the GI values of various monofloral (citrus, milk-vetch, chestnut, thyme, lime, pine) honeys of Turkey, and the effect of their consumption on glucose metabolism. Materials and methods: Processing data from 20 healthy volunteers, GI values were determined from the glycemia values by using the incremental area method. Serum insulin and C-peptide levels were also measured before and 120 min after the test. Results: The GI values of citrus, thyme, lime, chestnut, pine, and milk-vetch honeys were found to be 44.9, 52.6, 55.3, 55.5, 58.8, and 69, respectively. Serum insulin and C-peptide values after honey consumption were relatively lower than those after reference food (glucose) consumption. By the end of the 120 min, serum insulin levels were significantly higher, while a significant decrease was observed after the consumption of chestnut honey (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Citrus and thyme honeys were determined to have low GI, while serum insulin levels were significantly lower after the consumption of chestnut honey. Long-term research is needed to compare the effects of honey consumption on healthy and diabetic individuals.

PDF

___

1. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
2. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, Karsidag K, Genc S, Telci A, Canbaz B et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 28: 169180.
3. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, Bastar I, Tütüncü Y, Sargın M, Dinççag N et al. The TURDEP group. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the Turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1551 1556.
4. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Carbohydrates in human nutrition. (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper-66). Rome, Italy: FAO/WHO; 1998.
5. Al-Mamary M, Al-Meeri A, Al-Habori M. Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutr Res 2002; 22: 10411047.
6. OSullivan AM, OCallaghan YC, OConnor TP, OBrien NM. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of commercial honeys, before and after in-vitro digestion. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2013; 63: 167171.
7. Foster-Powell FK, Holt S, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 556.
8. Abdulrhman M, El-Hefnawy M, Hussein R, El-Goud AA. The glycemic and peak incremental indices of honey, sucrose and glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Effects on C-peptide levela pilot study. Acta Diabetol 2011; 48: 8994.
9. Arcot J, Brand-Miller J. A Preliminary Assessment of the Glycemic Index of Honey. A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Publication No: 05/027. Sydney, Austria: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; 2005.
10. Wolever T. How important is prediction of glycemic responses? Diabetes Care 1989; 12: 591592.
11. Wolever T, Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Josse RG. The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54; 846854.
12. Brouns F, Bjorck K. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 2005; 18: 145171.
13. Brand-Miller J, Barclay AW, Irwin T. A new food labeling program for glycemic index. Proc Nutr Soc 2001; 25: S21 (abstract).
14. Atkinson F, Powell K, Miller B. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 2281 2283.
15. Deibert P, Konig D, Kloock B, Groenefeld M, Berg A. Glycaemic and insulinaemic properties of some German honey varieties. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010; 10: 762764.
16. Vaisman N, Niv E, Izkhakov Y. Catalytic amounts of fructose may improve glucose tolerance in subjects with uncontrolled non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 617621.
17. Stanhope KL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Vink RG, Schaefer EJ, Nakajima K, Schwarz JM, Beysen C, Berglund L, Keim NL et al. Metabolic responses to prolonged consumption of glucose and fructose-sweetened beverages are not associated with postprandial or 24-h glucose and insulin excursions. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 112119.
18. Kwon S, Kim YJ, Kim MK. Effect of fructose or sucrose feeding with different levels on oral glucose tolerance test in normal and type 2 diabetic rats. Nutr Res Pract 2008; 2: 252258.
19. Erejuwa OO, Sulaiman SA, Wahab MS. Fructose might contribute to the hypoglycemic effect of honey. Molecules 2012; 17: 19001915.
20. Moran TH, McHugh PR. Distinctions among three sugars in their effects on gastric emptying and satiety. Am J Physiol 1981; 241: 2530.
21. Kellett GL, Brot-Laroche E, Mace OJ, Leturque A. Sugar absorption in the intestine: the role of GLUT2. Annu Rev Nutr 2008; 28: 3554.
22. Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Fava F. Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high-fat-diet-induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemia. Diabetologia 2007; 50: 23742383.
23. Shambaugh P, Worthington V, Herbert, JH. Differential effects of honey, sucrose, and fructose on blood sugar levels. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990; 13: 322325.
24. Ahmad A, Azim MK, Mesaik MA, Khan RA. Natural honey modulates physiological glycemic response compared to simulated honey and D-glucose. J Food Sci 2008; 73: H165 H167.
25. Yaghoobi N, Al-Wail N, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Parizadeh SM, Abasalti Z. Natural honey and cardiovascular risk factors; effects on blood glucose, cholesterol, triacylglycerole, CRP and body weight compared with sucrose. Scientific World Journal 2008; 8: 463469.
26. Münstedt K, Sheybani B, Hauenschild A, Brüggmann D, Bretzel RG, Winter D. Effects of basswood honey, honeycomparable glucose-fructose solution, and oral glucose tolerance test solution on serum insulin, glucose, and C-peptide concentrations in healthy subjects. J Med Food 2008; 11: 424 428.
27. Agrawal OP, Pachauri A, Yadav H, Urmila J, Goswamy HM, Chapperwal A, Bisen PS. Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance exhibit a high degree of tolerance to honey. J Med Food 2007; 10: 473478.
28. Watford M. Small amounts of dietary fructose dramatically increase hepatic glucose uptake. Nutr Rev 2002; 60: 253257.
29. Osei K, Falko JM, Fields PG, Bossetti, B, ODorisio TM. The effects of carbohydrate enriched meals on glucose turnover and metabolic clearance rates of glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 1986; 29: 100105.
30. Koh ET, Ard NF, Mendoza F. Effects of fructose feeding on blood parameters and blood pressure in impaired glucosetolerant subjects. J Am Diet Assoc 1988; 88: 932938.
31. Bantle JP, Swanson JE, Thomas W, Laine DC. Metabolic effects of dietary fructose in diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 14681476.
32. Heacock PM, Hertzler SR, Wolf BW. Fructose prefeeding reduces the glycemic response to a high-glycemic index, starchy food in humans. J Nutr 2002; 132: 26012604.
33. Tonouchi H, Yamaji T, Uchida M. Studies on absorption and metabolism of palatinose (isomaltulose) in rats. Br J Nutr 2011; 105: 1014.
34. Al-Waili NS. Natural honey lowers plasma glucose, C-reactive protein, homocysteine, and blood lipids in healthy, diabetic, and hyperlipidemic subjects: comparison with dextrose and sucrose. J Med Food 2004; 7: 100107.
35. Elliott S, Keim N, Stern J. Fructose, weight gain and the insulin. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 911922