Evren ALGIN YAPAR, Bilge Ahsen KARA, Ece HALAT, Aslı ŞAHİNER

Evaluation of organic load-related efficacy changes in antiseptic solutions used in hospitals

Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the change in antimicrobial efficacy related to the presence of the organic load of four different antiseptic solutions that are frequently used in hospitals. Materials and methods: Solutions of hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine digluconate, and ethyl alcohol were prepared, tested in terms of antimicrobial efficacy changes in the presence of organic substances, and evaluated according to EN 13727 and EN 13624 standards. Results: Among the investigated solutions ethanol 70% solution showed the best results by providing a 5-log reduction on all test organisms without affecting by the type and concentration of organic substances. Solutions of hydrogen peroxide 3%, povidone-iodine 7.5%, and chlorhexidine digluconate 0.2% performed lower antimicrobial efficacy depending on the concentration of organic load. Conclusion: It is concluded that the antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic solutions is significantly affected by the organic substances and thus the proper use of antiseptics has become important to achieve successful disinfection and prevention of antibacterial resistance.

PDF

___

1. Hoang TPN, Ghori MUU, Conway BR. Topical antiseptic formulations for skin and soft tissue infections. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13(4): 558. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040558
2. Mcdonnell G, Russell D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999; 12: 147-179. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.1.147
3. Şahiner A, Halat E, Algın Yapar E. Comparison of bactericidal and fungicidal efficacy of commonly used antiseptic formulations according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2019; 49: 1564- 1567. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-53
4. Radischat N, Augustin M, Herberger K, Wille A, Goroncy‐ Bermes P. Influence of human wound exudate on the bactericidal efficacy of antiseptic agents in quantitative suspension tests on the basis of European Standards (DIN EN 13727). International wound journal 2020; 17(3): 781-789. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13336
5. Chowdhury D, Rahman A, Hu H, Jensen SO, Deva AK et al. Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms. Journal of Hospital Infection 2019; 103(1): 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j. jhin.2018.10.019
6. Carling PC, Bartley JM. Evaluating hygienic cleaning in health care settings: what you do not know can harm your patients. American Journal of Infection Control 2010; 38: 41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.004
7. Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clinical Microbiology Review 2004;17(4): 863-893. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004
8. Kim JM, Park ES, Jeong JS, Kim KM, Kim JM et al. Multicenter surveillance study for nosocomial infections in major hospitals in Korea. Nosocomial infection surveillance committee of the Korean Society for Nosocomial Infection Control. American Journal of Infection Control 2000; 28: 454–458. doi: 10.1067/ mic.2000.107592
9. Pitten FA, Werner HP, Kramer A. A standardized test to assess the impact of different organic challenges on the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics. Journal of Hospital Infection 2003; 55(2): 108-115. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00260-3
10. Nicolae Dopcea G, Diguta CF, Matei F, Dopcea I, Nanu AE. Resistance and cross-resistance in Staphylococcus spp. strains following prolonged exposure to different antiseptics. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 2020; 21: 399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.10.021
11. EN 13727:2015. Chemical disinfectants. Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of bactericidal activity for instruments used in the medical area. Test method and requirements (phase 2/step 1).
12. EN 13624:2013. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics - Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of fungicidal activity of chemical disinfectants for instruments used in the medical area - Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1).
13. Chowdhury D, Rahman A, Hu H, Jensen SO, Deva AK et al. Effect of disinfectant formulation and organic soil on the efficacy of oxidizing disinfectants against biofilms. Journal of Hospital Infection 2019; 103(1): 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j. jhin.2018.10.019
14. Yoo JH. Review of disinfection and sterilization–back to the basics. Infection& Chemotherapy 2018; 50(2): 101. doi: 10.3947/ic.2018.50.2.101
15. McDonnell GE. Antisepsis, Disinfection, and Sterilization: Types, Action, and Resistance; American Society for Microbiology Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
16. Cheung HY, Wong MMK, Cheung SH, Liang LY, Lam YW et al. Differential actions of chlorhexidine on the cell wall of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Public Library of Science One 2012; 7(5), e36659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036659
17. McDonnell G. General mechanism of action. In: McDonnel GE, eds. Antisepsis, Disinfection, and Sterilization. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology Press 2017. pp. 255-269.
18. Yoshikawa H, Hirano A, Arakawa T, Shiraki K. Mechanistic insights into protein precipitation by alcohol. International journal of biological macromolecules 2012; 50(3), 865-871. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.11.005
19. Kim M, Weigand MR, Oh S, Hatt JK, Krishnan R et al. Widely used benzalkonium chloride disinfectants can promote antibiotic resistance. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2018; 84: 7–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01201-18
20. Tong C, Hu H, Chen G, Li Z, Li A et al. Disinfectant resistance in bacteria: mechanisms, spread, and resolution strategies. Environmental Research 2021; 110897. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2021.110897