Daily surveillance with early warning scores help predict hospital mortality in medical wards

Daily surveillance with early warning scores help predict hospital mortality in medical wards

Background/aim: To analyze the potency of a modified early warning score (EWS) to help predict hospital mortality when used for surveillance in nonacute medical wards. Materials and methods: Patients in internal medicine wards were prospectively recruited. First, highest, and last scores; and mean daily score recordings and values were recorded. Nurses calculated scores for each patient upon admission and every 4 h. The last score was the score before death, discharge, or transfer to another ward. The highest scores in total and for each single parameter were used for analysis. Results: Fifty-nine percent of 182 recruited patients had recordings eligible for data analysis. Patients admitted from the emergency room had higher mortality rates than patients admitted from outpatient clinics (15% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.01) as well as patients whose first (40% vs. 4.9%; P = 0.033) and highest scores (18.8% vs. 1.3%; P = 0.003) were equal to or more than 3. The first recorded EWS was not predictive for mortality while the maximum score during the admission period was. Conclusion: This study underlines the fact that each physiological variable of EWS may not have the same weight in determining the outcome.

___

  • 1. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A, Taylor B, Short A, Morgan G, Nielsen M, Barrett D, Smith G, Collins CH. Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ 1998; 316: 1853-1858.
  • 2. Sax FL, Charlson ME. Medical patients at high risk for catastrophic deterioration. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 510-515.
  • 3. Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 882-884.
  • 4. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. QJM 200; 94: 521-526.
  • 5. Duckitt RW, Buxton-Thomas R, Walker J, Cheek E, Bewick V, Venn R, Forni LG. Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, populationbased single-centre study. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 769-774.
  • 6. Prytherch DR, Smith GB, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. ViEWS—Towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 932-937.
  • 7. Kellett J, Kim A. Validation of an abbreviated Vitalpac™ Early Warning Score (ViEWS) in 75,419 consecutive admissions to a Canadian regional hospital. Resuscitation 2012; 83: 297-302.
  • 8. Bleyer AJ, Vidya S, Russell GB, Jones CM, Sujata L, Daeihagh P, Hire D. Longitudinal analysis of one million vital signs in patients in an academic medical center. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 1387-1392.
  • 9. Gao H, McDonnell A, Harrison DA, Moore T, Adam S, Daly K, Esmonde L, Goldhill DR, Parry GJ, Rashidian A et al. Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 667-679.
  • 10. Moon A, Cosgrove JF, Lea D, Fairs A, Cressey DM. An eight year audit before and after the introduction of modified early warning score (MEWS) charts, of patients admitted to a tertiary referral intensive care unit after CPR. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 150-154.
  • 11. Heitz CR, Gaillard JP, Blumstein H, Case D, Messick C, Miller CD. Performance of the maximum modified early warning score to predict the need for higher care utilization among admitted emergency department patients. J Hosp Med 2010; 5: 46-52.
  • 12. Garcea G, Ganga R, Neal CP, Ong SL, Dennison AR, Berry DP. Preoperative early warning scores can predict in-hospital mortality and critical care admission following emergency surgery. J Surg Res 2010; 159: 729-734.
  • 13. Ghanem-Zoubi NO, Vardi M, Laor A, Weber G, Bitterman H. Assessment of disease-severity scoring systems for patients with sepsis in general internal medicine departments. Crit Care 2011; 15: R95.
  • 14. Patel MS, Jones MA, Jiggins M, Williams SC. Does the use of a “track and trigger” warning system reduce mortality in trauma patients? Injury 2011; 42: 1455-1459.
  • 15. Clifton DA, Clifton L, Sandu DM, Smith GB, Tarassenko L, Vollam SA, Watkinson PJ. ‘Errors’ and omissions in paper based early warning scores: the association with changes in vital signs—a database analysis. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e007376.
  • 16. Jarvis S, Kovacs C, Briggs J, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI, Prytherch DR, Smith GB. Can binary early warning scores perform as well as standard early warning scores for discriminating a patient’s risk of cardiac arrest, death or unanticipated intensive care unit admission? Resuscitation 2015; 93: 46-52.
  • 17. Smith AF, Oakey RJ. Incidence and significance of errors in a patient ‘track and trigger’ system during an epidemic of Legionnaires’ disease: retrospective casenote analysis. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 222-228.
  • 18. Kim WY, Shin YJ, Lee JM, Huh JW, Koh Y, Lim CM, Hong SB. Modified early warning score changes prior to cardiac arrest in general wards. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0130523.
  • 19. Ludikhuize J, De Jonge E, Goossens A. Measuring adherence among nurses one year after training in applying the Modified Early Warning Score and Situation-Background-AssessmentRecommendation instruments. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 1428- 1433.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Comparison of wire-guided localization and radio-guided occult lesion localization in preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions

Murat TUNCEL, Tamer AKSOY, Demirali ONAT, Nazım Barış KANAT, Meltem ÇAĞLAR TUNCALI, Biray Emine CANER, Ayşegül FIRAT, Figen DEMİRKAZIK

Arzu Kalayci KARABAY, Vecih ODUNCU, Çetin GEÇMEN, Selim TOPCU, Can Yücel KARABAY, İbrahim Akin İZGİ, Cevat KIRMA

Pityriasis rosea: a natural history of pediatric cases in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey

Emine ÇÖLGEÇEN, Çiğdem KADER, Yılmaz ULAŞ, Pınar ÖZTÜRK, Mehmet BALCI, Öznur KÜÇÜK

The factors affecting survival in patients with bronchiectasis

Turan ACICAN, Zeynep Pınar ÖNEN, Fatma ÇİFTCİ, Öznur YILDIZ, Banu GÜLBAY, Sevgi Behiye SARYAL, Elif ŞEN, Gülseren KARABIYIKOĞLU

New immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Ferda BİR, Arzu YAREN, Tamer EDİRNE, Duygu ÇELİKER, Binnaz Fatma EVYAPAN

Barbara KOT, Jolanta WICHA, Agata GRUZEWSKA, Malgorzata PIECHOTA, Katarzyna WOLSKA, Maria OBREBSKA

Removing the specimen with traction during robotic radical prostatectomy does not cause a positive surgical margin

Abidin Egemen İŞGÖREN, Ziya AKBULUT, Muhammet Fuat ÖZCAN, Ali Fuat ATMACA, Serkan ALTINOVA, Abdullah Erdem CANDA, Mevlana Derya BALBAY

Erdal BENLİ, Fahriye Feriha ÖZER, Yasemin KAYA, Tuba Şaziye ÖZCAN, Ali AYYILDIZ

Abbas MAJDABADI, Mohammad ABAZARI

Surgical management of large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma: an analysis of 25 cases

Koray AYDOĞDU, Göktürk FINDIK, Funda DEMİRAĞ, Sadi KAYA, Selim Şakir Erkmen GÜLHAN, Funda İNCEKARA, Ebru SAYILIR