Fetal US and MRI in detection of craniospinal anomalies with postnatal correlation: single-center experience

Background/aim: To reveal the contribution of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ultrasound (US) in prenatal diagnosis of fetal craniospinal anomalies by retrospectively comparing the prenatal and postnatal findings. Materials and methods: After institutional review board approval, between January 2010 and May 2020, 301 pregnant women, which had a gestational age between 19–37 weeks (mean 26.5 ± 6.1 weeks), diagnosed with cranial and spinal anomalies on fetal US and later on imaged with MRI were evaluated, and in 179 of those cases prenatal imaging findings were compared with postnatal findings. Results: A total of 191 fetal craniospinal anomalies were detected in 179 pregnant women. MRI and US diagnosis were completely correct in 145 (75.9%) and 112 (58.6%), respectively. Diagnostic performance of MRI was significantly higher than that of the US (p < 0.05). Both prenatal MRI and US findings were concordant with postnatal diagnosis in 53% of the cases. In 28.7% cases, prenatal MRI contributed to US by either changing the wrong US diagnosis (8.9%), demonstration of additional findings (14%), or confirming the suspicious US diagnosis (5.8%). Conclusion: Due to its high resolution and multiplanar imaging capability, fetal MRI contributes significantly to US in the correct prenatal diagnosis of craniospinal anomalies. This contribution especially is significant in neural tube defects, cortical malformations, and ischemic-hemorrhagic lesions.Key words: Fetal MRI, fetal ultrasound, craniospinal malformations, prenatal diagnosis

PDF

___

1. Goldberg JD. Routine screening for fetal anomalies: expectations. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2004; 31 (1): 35-50. doi: 10.1016/S0889 8545(03)00118-9
2. Kul S, Korkmaz HA, Cansu A, Dinc H, Ahmetoglu A et al. Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012; 35 (4): 882-890. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23502
3. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, HernandezAndrade C et al. ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan. The Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; 37 (1): 116-126. doi: 10.1002/uog.8831
4. Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, Vinci V, Saldari M et al. Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: state-of-theart. European Journal of Radiology 2017; 93: 273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.004
5. Blaicher W, Prayer D, Bernaschek G. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the assessment of the fetal central nervous system. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2003; 31 (6): 459-468. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2003.071
6. Hibbeln JF, Shors SM, Byrd SE. MRI: is there a role in obstetrics? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012; 55 (1): 352-366. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182487d04
7. Gat I, Hoffmann C, Shashar D, Yosef O. B, Konen E et al. Fetal Brain MRI: Novel Classification and Contribution to Sonography. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2016; 37 (2): 176-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384935
8. Duczkowska A, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M, HermanSucharska I, Duczkowski M, Romaniuk-Doroszewska A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the fetal spinal canal contents. Brain and Development 2011; 33 (1): 10- 20. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2010.01.003
9. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’. The Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 29 (1): 109-116. doi: 10.1002/ uog.3909
10. Sandrasegaran K, Lall CG, Aisen AA. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 18 (6): 605-612. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000247394.94592.a5
11. Van Doorn M, Oude Rengerink K, Newsum EA, Reneman L, Majoie CB et al. Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of MaternalFetal and Neonatal Medicine 2016; 29 (18): 2949-2961. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621
12. Parazzini C, Righini S, Doneda C, Arrigoni F, Rustico M et al. Is fetal magnetic resonance imaging indicated when ultrasound isolated mild ventriculomegaly is present in pregnancies with no risk factors? Prenatal Diagnosis 2012; 32 (8): 752-757. doi: 10.1002/pd.3896
13. Patel MD, Filly AL, Hersh DR, Goldstein RB. Isolated mild fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: clinical course and outcome. Radiology 1994; 192 (3): 759-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ radiology.192.3.7520183
14. Falip C, Blanc N, Maes E, Zaccaria I, Oury JF et al. Postnatal clinical and imaging follow-up of infants with prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly: a series of 101 cases. Pediatric Radiology 2007; 37 (10): 981-989. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007- 0582-2
15. Pilu G, Falco P, Gabrielli S, Perolo A, Saundra F et al. The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly. Report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999; 14 (5): 320-326. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14050320.x
16. Vergani P, Ghidini A, Strobelt N, Locatelli A, Mariani S et al. Prognostic indicators in the prenatal diagnosis of agenesis of corpus callosum. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 170 (3): 753-758. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9378(94)70277-2
17. Glass HC, Shaw GM, Ma C, Sherr EH. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in California 1983-2003: a population-based study. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2008; 1; 146A (19): 2495-2500. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32418
18. Goodyear PW, Bannister CM, Russell S, Rimmer S. Outcome in prenatally diagnosed fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2001; 16 (3): 139-145. doi: 10.1159/000053898
19. Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012; 206 (4): 337.e1-337.e5. doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2011.12.024
20. Aicardi J. The agyria-pachygyria complex: a spectrum of cortical malformations. Brain and Development 1991; 13 (1): 1-8. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(12)80289-0
21. Glenn OA, Cuneo AA, Barkovich AJ, Hashemi Z, Bartha AI et al. Malformations of cortical development: diagnostic accuracy of fetal MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 263 (3): 843-855. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12102492
22. O’Connor SC, Rooks VJ, Smith AB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system, head, neck, and chest. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2012; 33 (1): 86- 101. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.10.005
23. Frey L, Hauser WA. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 2003; 44 (3): 4-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s3.2.x