Turhan KAHRAMAN, Sema SAVCI, Buse ÖZCAN KAHRAMAN, Serap ACAR, Aylin TANRIVERDİ, Bihter ŞENTÜRK, Bahri AKDENİZ, Ebru ÖZPELİT, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1116

Assessment of psychometric properties, cross-cultural adaptation, and translation of the Turkish version of the ICU mobility scale

Background/aim: The aim of the study was to carry out the cultural adaptation and translation of the ICU mobility scale (IMS) into Turkish and research the psychometric properties. Materials and methods: This study was based on methodological design. The IMS was translated from English to the Turkish through a regularised translation process. Two physiotherapists assessed patients independently in the coronary intensive care unit. The measures such as construct validity, intra and interrater reliability, and internal consistency of the IMS Turkish version were assessed. Results: A total of 70 intensive care patients were included in the study. The intrarater and interrater reliability of the IMS was excellent. The weighted Kappa value was 0.92 (0.87–0.96) for the intrarater reliability, and 0.87 (0.80–0.93) for the interrater reliability. There were significant correlations between the IMS and functional status score for the intensive care unit (r = 0.83), Perme intensive care unit mobility score (r = 0.84), Katz activities of daily living (r = 0.73), handgrip strength (r = 0.62), knee extension strength (r = 0.46), and age (r = –0.44). Conclusion: This study suggests that the IMS Turkish version is a reliable and valid scale for assessing functional status and mobility level in ICU patients.Key words: ICU mobility scale, functional status, intensive care unit

PDF

___

1. Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK, Connolly B, Diaz JV et al. What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Journal of Critical Care 2017; 37: 270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.015
2. Zhang L, Hu W, Cai Z, Liu J, Wu J et al. Early mobilization of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14 (10): e0223185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223185
3. Arias-Fernández P, Romero-Martin M, Gómez-Salgado J, Fernández-García D Rehabilitation and early mobilization in the critical patient: systematic review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2018; 30 (9): 1193-1201. doi: 10.1589/ jpts.30.1193
4. Parry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, Jones J, Beach L et al. Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Medicine 2015; 41 (5): 744-762. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3672-x
5. Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A et al. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU mobility scale. Heart and Lung 2014; 43 (1): 19-24. doi: 10.1016/j. hrtlng.2013.11.003
6. Tipping CJ, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, Berney S, Buhr H et al. The ICU mobility scale has construct and predictive validity and is responsive. A multicenter observational study. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2016; 13 (6): 887-893. doi: 10.1513/ AnnalsATS.201510-717OC
7. Kawaguchi YM, Nawa RK, Figueiredo TB, Martins L, PiresNeto RC. Perme intensive care unit mobility score and ICU mobility scale: translation into Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 2016; 42 (6): 429-434. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562015000000301
8. Wilches Luna EC, Hernández NL, Siriani De Oliveira A, Kenji Nawa R, Perme C et al. Perme ICU mobility score (perme score) and the ICU mobility scale (IMS): translation and cultural adaptation for the Spanish language. Colombia Médica 2018; 49 (4): 265-272. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i3.4042
9. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25 (24): 3186-3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
10. Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K et al. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. Journal of Critical Care 2010; 25 (2): 254-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010
11. Ozcan Kahraman B, Ozsoy I, Kahraman T, Tanriverdi A, Acar S et al. Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and assessment of psychometric properties of the functional status score for the intensive care unit. Disability and Rehabilitation 2019; 25: 1-6. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1602852
12. Perme C, Nawa RK, Winkelman C, Masud F. A tool to assess mobility status in critically ill patients: the perme intensive care unit mobility score. Methodist Debakey Cardiovascular Journal 2014; 10 (1): 41-49. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-10-1-41
13. Söyler DE. Validity and reliability study of the turkish version of perme intensive care unit mobility scale. MSc, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey, 2019.
14. Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78 (1): 26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8
15. Haidar SG, Kumar D, Bassi RS, Deshmukh SC. Average versus maximum grip strength: which is more consistent? Journal of Hand Surgery 2004; 29 (1): 82-84. doi: 10.1016/j. jhsb.2003.09.012
16. Wallace M, Shelkey M. Katz index of independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Urologic Nursing 2007; 27 (1): 93-94.
17. Arik G, Varan HD, Yavuz BB, Karabulut E, Kara O et al. Validation of Katz index of independence in activities of daily living in Turkish older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2015; 61 (3): 344-350. doi: 10.1016/j. archger.2015.08.019
18. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1991.
19. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
20. Parry SM, Denehy L, Beach LJ, Berney S, Williamson HC et al. Functional outcomes in ICU–what should we be using?–an observational study. Critical Care 2015; 19 (1): 127.
21. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2 (14): i-iv, 1-74.