Aphasia in Hemiplegic Patients

Aim: The aim of this study was to define aphasia frequency and its clinical types together with the relationship between the clinical types and age, gender, hemiplegic side, etiology and educational level of the hemiplegic patients. Methods: All hemiplegic patients who admitted to Ankara Physical Therapy Training and Research Hospital (APTTRH) from January 2002 to January 2003 were included in this study. During this period, 478 hemiplegic patients were hospitalized for rehabilitation. One hundred and five of these patients were identified to have speech disorders; seven patients were excluded from the study. The Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson chi-square test were used to investigate gender differences and predictive association among the variables of age, gender, educational levels and type of aphasia. Results: Mean age of aphasic patients was calculated as 56.1 (21-79) years. Of 98 aphasic patients, 73 (74.4%) were non-fluent, and 25 (25.6%) were fluent. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean ages of fluent and non-fluent aphasics (P > 0.05). Mean age of Broca aphasics (48.7) was younger than of Wernicke (56.3) and global (62.1) aphasics, and this difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between gender and etiology, dominant hand, hemiplegic side, educational level and types of aphasia (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Aphasia is one of the most common complications to develop due to cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Accordingly, further research is in progress to examine the relation between age, gender and etiology and to probe its causes, using a criterion other than the presence of aphasia.

Aphasia in Hemiplegic Patients

Aim: The aim of this study was to define aphasia frequency and its clinical types together with the relationship between the clinical types and age, gender, hemiplegic side, etiology and educational level of the hemiplegic patients. Methods: All hemiplegic patients who admitted to Ankara Physical Therapy Training and Research Hospital (APTTRH) from January 2002 to January 2003 were included in this study. During this period, 478 hemiplegic patients were hospitalized for rehabilitation. One hundred and five of these patients were identified to have speech disorders; seven patients were excluded from the study. The Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson chi-square test were used to investigate gender differences and predictive association among the variables of age, gender, educational levels and type of aphasia. Results: Mean age of aphasic patients was calculated as 56.1 (21-79) years. Of 98 aphasic patients, 73 (74.4%) were non-fluent, and 25 (25.6%) were fluent. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean ages of fluent and non-fluent aphasics (P > 0.05). Mean age of Broca aphasics (48.7) was younger than of Wernicke (56.3) and global (62.1) aphasics, and this difference was of statistical significance (P < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between gender and etiology, dominant hand, hemiplegic side, educational level and types of aphasia (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Aphasia is one of the most common complications to develop due to cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Accordingly, further research is in progress to examine the relation between age, gender and etiology and to probe its causes, using a criterion other than the presence of aphasia.

___

  • Lendrem W, Lincoln NB. Spontaneous recovery of language in patients with aphasia between 4-34 weeks after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985; 48: 743-748.
  • Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M, Coino P, De Angelis D, Fuscu FR et al. Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. A matched comparison. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 400-406.
  • Demeurise G, Demol O, Derouck M, Beuckelaer R, Coekaerts N, Capan A. Quantitative study of rate of recovery from aphasia due to ischemic stroke. Stroke 1980; 11: 455-458.
  • Culton GL. Spontaneous recovery from aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 825-832.
  • Pickersgill MJ, Lincoln NB. Prognostic indicators and the pattern of recovery of communication in aphasic stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 130-139.
  • Obler LK, Aloert ML, Goodglass H. Aphasia type and aging. Brain Lang 1978; 6: 318-322.
  • Kertesz A, Lask D, McCabe P. Isotope localization of infarcts in aphasia. Arch Neurol 1997; 34: 590-601.
  • Eslinger PJ, Domasio AR. Age and type of aphasia in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981; 44: 377-381.
  • Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cere- brovasc Dis 2004; 17: 35-43.
  • Knepper LE, Biller J, Tranel D, Adams HP Jr, Marsh EE. Etiology of stroke in patients with Wernike’s aphasia. Stroke 1989; 20: 1730-1732.
  • Bogousslavsky J, Cachin C, Regli F, Despland PA, Van Melle G, Kappenberger L et al. Cardiac source of embolism and cerebral infarction - clinical consequences and vascular concomitants: The Lausanne Stroke Registry. Neurology 1991; 41: 855-859.
  • Ferro JM, Madureira S. Aphasia type, age and cerebral infarct localisation. J Neurol 1997; 244: 505-509.
  • Bhatnager SC, Jain SK, Bihari M, Bansal NK, Pauranik A, Jain DC et al. Aphasia type and aging in Hindi-speaking stroke patient. Brain Lang 2002; 83: 353-361.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK