A comparison of different doses of remifentanil and tracheal lidocaine on attenuation of cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Background: The efficacy of remifentanil infusion versus tracheal lidocaine for attenuation of the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation has been previously reported. This study compared hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and intubation using tracheal lidocaine and remifentanil. Materials and Methods: The study included 90 patients that were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia and randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups: remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 min-1 bolus over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg kg-1 min-1 (R1); remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 min-1 over 30 s and an infusion of 0.25 µg kg-1 min-1 (R2); tracheal lidocaine (TL) (10%, 1.5 ml) spray 3 min after anesthesia induction (TL). Then the laryngoscope was removed and 3 min later, laryngoscopic intubation was performed. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate-pressure product (RPP) were measured before induction of anesthesia (baseline), immediately before endotracheal intubation, and 1, 3, and 5 min after endotracheal intubation. Results: Just before endotracheal intubation, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and RPP were significantly lower than at baseline in the R1 and R2 groups (P < 0.05). One minute after endotracheal intubation, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, and RPP were significantly higher in the TL group than in the R1 group (P < 0.05). Heart rate was significantly higher in the TL group than in the R1 group 1, 3, and 5 min after laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For attenuation of chronotropic response to tracheal intubation, remifentanil bolus and infusion was more effective than tracheal lidocaine.

A comparison of different doses of remifentanil and tracheal lidocaine on attenuation of cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Background: The efficacy of remifentanil infusion versus tracheal lidocaine for attenuation of the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation has been previously reported. This study compared hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and intubation using tracheal lidocaine and remifentanil. Materials and Methods: The study included 90 patients that were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia and randomly allocated to 3 treatment groups: remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 min-1 bolus over 30 s, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg kg-1 min-1 (R1); remifentanil 0.5 µg kg-1 min-1 over 30 s and an infusion of 0.25 µg kg-1 min-1 (R2); tracheal lidocaine (TL) (10%, 1.5 ml) spray 3 min after anesthesia induction (TL). Then the laryngoscope was removed and 3 min later, laryngoscopic intubation was performed. Heart rate, systolic arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate-pressure product (RPP) were measured before induction of anesthesia (baseline), immediately before endotracheal intubation, and 1, 3, and 5 min after endotracheal intubation. Results: Just before endotracheal intubation, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and RPP were significantly lower than at baseline in the R1 and R2 groups (P < 0.05). One minute after endotracheal intubation, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure, and RPP were significantly higher in the TL group than in the R1 group (P < 0.05). Heart rate was significantly higher in the TL group than in the R1 group 1, 3, and 5 min after laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For attenuation of chronotropic response to tracheal intubation, remifentanil bolus and infusion was more effective than tracheal lidocaine.

___

  • Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine response to laryngoscopy with and without endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 295-299. 2. Derbyshire DC, Chmielewski A, Fell D, Vater M, Achola K, Smith G. Plasma catecholamine response to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 855-859.
  • Russell WJ, Morris RG, Frewin DB, Drew SE. Changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations during endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1981; 53: 837-839. 4. Edwards DN, Alford AM, Dobson PMS, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 537-539.
  • Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47: 524-5. 6. Crawford DC, Fell D, Achola KJ, Smith G. Effects of alfentanil on the pressor and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:707-712.
  • Stoelting RK. Attenuation of blood pressure response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with sodium nitroprusside. Anesth Analg 1979; 58: 116-119. 8. Vucevic M, Purdy GM, Ellis FR. Esmolol hydrochloride for the management of the cardiovascular stress responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 529-530. 9. Mikawa K, Obara H, Kusunoki M. Effect of nicardipine on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 240-2.
  • Hamill JF, Bedford RF, Weaver DC, Colohan AR. Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intravenous or laryngotracheal? Anesthesiology 1981; 55: 578-81.
  • Thompson JP, Rowbotham DJ. Remifentanilan opioid for the 21st century. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 341-343.
  • Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, Cagney B, Rowbotham DJ. Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 80: 467-9.
  • Hall AP, Thompson JP, Leslie NA, Fax AJ, Kumar N, Rowbotham DJ. Comparison of different doses of remifentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 100-2.
  • Wilhelm W, Biedler A, Huppert A, Kreuer S, Bücheler O, Ziegenfuss T et al. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil or fentanyl on anaesthetic induction characteristics of propofol, thiopental or etomidate. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19: 350-6.
  • Takita K, Morimoto Y, Kemmotsu O. Tracheal lidocaine attenuates the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 732-6.
  • Denlinger JK, Ellison N, Ominsky AJ. Effects of intratracheal lidocaine on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1974; 41: 409-12.
  • Derbyshire DR, Smith G, Achola KJ. Effect of topical lignocaine on the sympathodrenal responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 300-4.
  • Mostafa SM, Murthy BVS, Barrett PJ, McHugh P. Comparison of the effects of topical lignocaine spray applied before or after induction of anesthesia on the pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and intubation. Eur J Anesthesiol 1999; 16: 7-10.
  • Glass PSA. Pharmacology of remifentanil. Eur J Anesthesiol 1995; 12(Suppl 10): 73-4.
  • Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 39: 1105, 1984
  • Yusa T, Taira Y, Sasara T, Yoza K. Effects of intratracheal lidocaine spray on circulatory responses to endotracheal intubation. Masui. 1990; 39: 1325-32.
  • Schüttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, Osnes S, Prys-Roberts C, Holder K. A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesthesia. 1997; 52: 307-17.
  • Hogue CW Jr, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, Duncalf D, Miguel R, Pitts M. A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 1996; 83: 279-85.
  • Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F, Conahan TJ, Maurer W, Angel JJ. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. The Remifentanil/Alfentanil Outpatient TIVA Group. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84: 515-21.
  • Singh H, Vichitvejpaisal P, Gaines GY, White PF. Comparative effects of lidocaine, esmolol, and nitroglycerin in modifying the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7: 5-8
  • McAtamney D, O'Hare R, Hughes D, Carabine U, Mirakhur R. Evaluation of remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anesthesia. 1998; 53: 1223-7.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Lack of association between TLR4 polymorphism and severe gram-negative bacterial infection in neonates

İlhan TEZCAN, Leman YEL, Şule YİĞİT, Gülsevin TEKİNALP, Lütfiye MESCİ, Özden SANAL, Turul Tuba ÖZGÜR, Fügen ERSOY

Acute effect of speed exercise on nitric oxide (NO) level of footballers

Özcan SAYGIN

Primary mucosal desmoplastic melanoma of the gingiva

İbrahim ALADAĞ, Reşit Doğan KÖSEOĞLU, Nilüfer ÖZKAN, Engin SEZER

A comparison of different doses of remifentanil and tracheal lidocaine on attenuation of cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Azim HONARMAND, Mohammadreza SAFAVI

Sexual functioning in hemodialysis patients and their spouses: results of a prospective study from Turkey

Gökhan NERGİZOĞLU, Ceren GÖKER, Ayşegül YILMAZ, Atilla SOYKAN, Vesile ŞENTÜRK, Bahire AYGÖR, Hakan KUMBASAR, Orhan Murat KOÇAK

Characterization of the human GYS2 gene and its product using bioinformatic tools

Ali ATAŞ, Fuat DİLMEÇ

Isolated fungal sinusitis of the sphenoid sinus

Halit AKMANSU, Muharrem DAĞLI, Özge HAN, Adil ERYILMAZ, Ayşe İRİZ, Bengi ARSLAN

Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: a case report

Yeşim KAYMAK, Aslı ERALP

Prevalence of SEN virus genotype-D and genotype-H among haemodialysed patients

Seda TEZCAN, Gönül ASLAN, Nuran DELİALİOĞLU, Naci TİFTİK, Gürol EMEKDAŞ, Mehmet Sami SERİN

HIV/AIDS knowledge among a group of youngsters under social protection in Turkey

Veli DUYAN, Çamur Gülsüm DUYAN