Süleyman CEBECİ, Mehmet Suat ÖZBİLEN, İsmet BAYRAMOĞLU, Yusuf Kemal KEMALOĞLU, Kadir Kemal UYGUR, Yıldırım Ahmet BAYAZIT, Recep KARAMERT

Impact of the demographic and aetiological factors and intraoperative findings on postoperative outcomes in chronic otitis media surgery

Background/aim: Surgical success is related with many factors belonging to both the patient and the disease. This study aims to analyse the preoperative and intraoperative characteristics, the postoperative results, and the factors affecting the surgical success in different types of chronic otitis media COM .Materials and methods: A total of 1510 ears of 1398 patients who underwent COM surgery were included in the study. Postoperative results were obtained from 376 ears of 356 patients who had been followed after surgery. The demographic characteristics of the patients, such as age and sex, operative findings, preoperative audiological examination results, and final audiometric and otoscopic examination findings, were retrospectively obtained from the archives of the department.Results: The most frequent diagnosis was simple COM 39.9% , and the most frequently performed surgery was tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy 46.6% . The overall hearing success rate was found to be 75.8%. Postoperative hearing success was significantly associated with the chronic otitis subgroup, ossicular pathologies, and the condition of the middle ear mucosa. Postoperative graft take rate was found to be 78.6%. Graft success was statistically significantly higher in patients with normal middle ear mucosa. Performing mastoidectomy, the presence of patency in aditus ad antrum, and being a paediatric case had no impact on graft success.Conclusion: Factors affecting the success of COM surgery include age, chronic otitis subgroup, location and size of perforation, the condition of the middle ear mucosa, and the level of the ossicular disease. These factors should be known and an appropriate treatment plan should be prepared.

Keywords:

Chronic otitis media, cholesteatoma, tympanoplasty, surgery,

PDF

___

1. Özbilen S. Kronik süpüratif otitis media. In: Çelik O (editor). Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi. İstanbul, Turkey: Turgut Yayıncılık; 2002. pp. 160-163 (in Turkish).
2. Gulya AJ, Schucknecht HF. Anatomy of the Temporal Bone with Surgical Implications. 2nd ed. Pearl River, NY, USA: Parthenon Publishing Group Inc.; 1993.
3. Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Long-term results of surgical treatment in different cholesteatoma types. American Journal of Otology 1993; 14 (5): 507-511. doi: 10.1097/00129492- 199309000-00017
4. Bhaya MH, Schachern PA, Morizono T, Paparella MM. Pathogenesis of tympanosclerosis. OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery 1993; 109 (3): 413-420. doi: 10.1177/019459989310900305
5. Tos M, Lau T. Late results of surgery in different cholesteatoma types. ORL Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties 1989; 51 (1): 33-49. doi: 10.1159/000276030
6. Carr MM, Poje CP, Nagy ML, Pizzuto MP, Brodsky LS. Success rates in pediatric tympanoplasty. Journal of Otolaryngology 2001; 30 (4): 199. doi: 10.2310/7070.2001.19703
7. Ojala K, Sorri M. Late post-operative hearing results correlated with the severity of tissue changes in ears with chronic otitis media. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 1983; 97 (2): 131- 139. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100093907
8. Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Success and pitfalls in myringoplasty: follow-up study of 404 cases. American Journal of Otology 1993; 14 (3): 301-305.
9. Shishegar M, Faramarzi M, Rashidi RM. Evaluation of middle ear risk index in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2019; 276 (10): 2769- 2774. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05539-w
10. Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2008; 139 (3): 386- 390. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.623
11. M. Ossiculoplasty and tympanoplasty. In: Tos M (editor). Manual of Middle Ear Surgery Volume 1: Approaches, Myringoplasty, Ossiculoplasty and Tympanoplasty. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1993. pp. 238-244.
12. Murphy TP. Hearing results in pediatric patients with chronic otitis media after ossicular reconstruction with partial ossicular replacement prostheses and total ossicular replacement prostheses. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (4): 536-544. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00005
13. Kartush JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction: capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1994; 27: 689-715.
14. Proctor B, Nielsen E, Proctor C. Petrosquamosal suture and lamina. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1981; 89 (3): 482-495. doi: 10.1177/019459988108900325
15. Proctor B. Attic-aditus block and the tympanic diaphragm. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1971; 80 (3): 371-375. doi: 10.1177/000348947108000311
16. Göksu N, Kemaloğlu Y, Köybaşıoğlu A, Ileri F, Ozbilen S et al. Clinical importance of the Korner’s septum. American Journal of Otology 1997; 18: 304-306.
17. Li D, Cao Y. Facial canal dehiscence: a report of 1,465 stapes operations. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1996; 105 (6): 467-471. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500609
18. Bayazit YA, Ozer E, Kanlikama M. Gross dehiscence of the bone covering the facial nerve in the light of otological surgery. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2002; 116 (10): 800-803. doi: 10.1258/00222150260293600
19. Selesnick SH, Lynn-Macrae AG. The incidence of facial nerve dehiscence at surgery for cholesteatoma. Otology & Neurotology 2001; 22 (2): 129-132. doi: 10.1097/00129492- 200103000-00002
20. Kalcioglu MT, Kilic O, Tuysuz O, Serifler S, Tekin M. Facial canal dehiscence rate: a retrospective analysis of 372 chronic otitis media cases. European Archives of Oto-RhinoLaryngology 2019; 276 (1): 79-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018- 5198-7
21. Copeland BJ, Buchman CA. Management of labyrinthine fistulae in chronic ear surgery. American Journal of Otolaryngology 2003; 24 (1): 51-60. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2003.10
22. Sade J, Halevy A. The aetiology of bone destruction in chronic otitis media. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 1974; 88 (2): 139-143. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100078476
23. Ruhl CM, Pensak ML. Role of aerating mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (12): 1924-1927. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199912000- 00005
24. Wehrs RE. Ossicular reconstruction in ears with cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1989; 22 (5): 1003- 1013.
25. Ho SY, Kveton JF. Efficacy of the 2-staged procedure in the management of cholesteatoma. Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery 2003; 129 (5): 541-545. doi: 10.1001/ archotol.129.5.541
26. Syms MJ, Luxford WM. Management of cholesteatoma: status of the canal wall. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (3): 443-448. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200303000-00010
27. Ho KY, Tsai SM, Chai CY, Wang HM. Clinical analysis of intratympanic tympanosclerosis: etiology, ossicular chain findings and hearing results of surgery. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2010; 130 (3): 370-374. doi: 10.1080/00016480903193429
28. Asiri S, Hasham A, Al Anazy F, Zakzouk S, Banjar A. Tympanosclerosis: review of literature and incidence among patients with middle-ear infection. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 1999; 113 (12): 1076-1080. doi: 10.1017/ s0022215100157937
29. McGee M, Hough JV. Ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 1999; 32 (3): 471-488. doi: 10.1016/s0030- 6665(05)70146-8
30. Baumann I, Diedrichs H, Plinkert P, Zenner H. Autologous tissue in initial type I and type III tympanoplasty operations in chronic suppurative otitis media. HNO 1997; 45 (12): 990-996. doi: 10.1007/s001060050184
31. Tsuzuki K, Yanagihara N, Hinohira Y, Sakagami M. Tympanosclerosis involving the ossicular chain: mobility of the stapes in association with hearing results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2006; 126 (10): 1046-1052. doi: 10.1080/00016480600672634
32. Brown JS. A ten year statistical follow-up of 1142 consecutive cases of cholesteatoma: the closed vs. the open technique. Laryngoscope 1982; 92 (4): 390-396. doi: 10.1288/00005537- 198204000-00007
33. Austin DF. Ossicular reconstruction. Archives of Otolaryngology 1971; 94 (6): 525-535. doi: 10.1001/ archotol.1971.00770070825007
34. Slater PW, Rizer FM, Schuring AG, Lippy WH. Practical use of total and partial ossicular replacement prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 1997; 107 (9): 1193-1198. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199709000-00007
35. Vartiainen E. Findings in revision myringoplasty. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal 1993; 72 (3): 201-204.
36. Goodman W, Wallace I. Tympanoplasty--25 years later. Journal of Otolaryngology 1980; 9 (2): 155-164.
37. Hough J. Tympanoplasty with the interior fascial graft technique and ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1970; 80 (9): 1385-1413. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197009000-00006
38. Paparella MM, Froymovich O. Surgical advances in treating otitis media. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement 1994; 103: 49-53. doi: 10.1177/00034894941030s514
39. Jackler RK, Schindler RA. Role of the mastoid in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1984; 94 (4): 495- 500. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198404000-00013
40. Balyan FR, Celikkanat S, Aslan A, Taibah A, Russo A et al. Mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media: is it necessary? Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 1997; 117 (6): 592-595. doi: 10.1016/s0194- 5998(97)70038-x
41. Bylander A, Tjernström Ö. Changes in Eustachian tube function with age in children with normal ears. A longitudinal study. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 1983; 96 (5-6): 467-477. doi: 10.3109/00016488309132733
42. Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M, De Donato G, Russo A et al. Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 1998; 118 (5): 709-713. doi: 10.1177/019459989811800529