A note on chaos in product maps
In this paper, we mainly discuss how chaos conditions on semi-flows carry over to their products. We show that if two semi-flows (or even one of them) are sensitive, so does their product. On the other side, the product of two topologically transitive semi-flows need not be topologically transitive. We then provide several sufficient conditions under which the product of two chaotic semi-flows is chaotic in the sense of Devaney. Also, stronger forms of sensitivity and transitivity for product systems are studied. In particular, we introduce the notion of ergodic sensitivity and prove that for any given two (not-necessarily continuous) maps f: X \rightarrow X and g: Y \rightarrow Y (resp. semi-flows y: R+ \times X \rightarrow X and f: R+ \times Y \rightarrow Y) on the metric spaces X and Y, f \times g (resp. y \times f) is ergodically sensitive if and only if f or g (resp. y or f) is ergodically sensitive. Our results improve and extend some existing ones.
A note on chaos in product maps
In this paper, we mainly discuss how chaos conditions on semi-flows carry over to their products. We show that if two semi-flows (or even one of them) are sensitive, so does their product. On the other side, the product of two topologically transitive semi-flows need not be topologically transitive. We then provide several sufficient conditions under which the product of two chaotic semi-flows is chaotic in the sense of Devaney. Also, stronger forms of sensitivity and transitivity for product systems are studied. In particular, we introduce the notion of ergodic sensitivity and prove that for any given two (not-necessarily continuous) maps f: X \rightarrow X and g: Y \rightarrow Y (resp. semi-flows y: R+ \times X \rightarrow X and f: R+ \times Y \rightarrow Y) on the metric spaces X and Y, f \times g (resp. y \times f) is ergodically sensitive if and only if f or g (resp. y or f) is ergodically sensitive. Our results improve and extend some existing ones.
___
- Akin E.: The General Topology of Dynamical Systems, Providence. Amer. Math. Soc. Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol.1, 1993.
- Alseda L., del Ro M., Rodrguez J.: A survey on the relation between transitivity and dense periodicity for graph maps. J. Difference Equ. Appl. (3–4)9, 281–288 (2003).
- Banks, J., Brooks, J. Chairs, G. Davis, G., Stacey, P.: On Devaney’s Definition of Chaos. Amer. Math. Monthly 99, 332–334 (1992).
- Block L., Coppel W. A.: Dynamics in one dimension. New York. Spring-Verlag. Lec. Notes in Math. 1513, 1992. Bowen R., Walters P.: Expansive one-parameter flows. Journal of Differential Equations 12, 180–193 (1972).
- De˘ girmenci N., Ko¸cak S ¸.: Chaos in product maps. Turk. J. Math. 34, 593–600 (2010).
- De˘ girmenci N., Ko¸cak S ¸.: Existence of a Dense Orbit and Topological Transitivity: When Are They Equivalent? Acta Math. Hungar. (3)99, 185–187 (2003).
- Devaney, R.: An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems. 2nd edition. Colorado. Addison-Wesley 1989.
- Elaydi, S. N.: Discrete Chaos. London. Chapman and Hall 2000.
- Haranczyk G., Kwietniak D., Oprocha P.: A note on transitivity, sensitivity and chaos for graph maps. J. Difference Equ. Appl. 17, 1549–1553 (2011).
- Hasselblatt, B., Katok, A.: A First Course in Dynamics. New York. Cambridge University Press 2003.
- He L., Yan X., Wang L.: Weak-mixing implies sensitive dependence. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 299, 300–304 (2004). He L., Zhang Z.: Chaos in the semi-Flows and its inverse Limit systems. Acta Math. Sci. 17(Supplement), 46–51 (1997).
- Kolyada, S., Snoha, S.: Some Aspects of Topological Transitivity-A Survey. Grazer Math. Ber. 334, 3–35 (1997). Moothathu T. K. S.: Stronger forms of sensitivity for dynamical systems. Nonlinearity 20, 2115–2126 (2007).
- Walter P.: An introduction to ergodic theory. New York. Spring-Verlag 1982.
- Ye X.: The centre and the depth of a tree map. Austral. Math. Soc. 48, 347–350 (1993).