___

• Açıkgöz, E., Sincik, M.,Karasu, A., Tongel, O., Wietgrefed, G., Bilgili, U., Oz, M., Albayrak, S., Turan, ZM and AT Göksoy. 2009. Forage Soybean Production for Seed in Mediterranean Environments. Field Crops Research. 110(3):213-218.
• Açıkgöz, E., Sincik, M.,Öz, M., Albayrak, S., Wietgrefed, G., Turan, Z.M., Göksoy, A.T., Bilgili, U., Karasu, A., Töngel, Ö and O. Canbolat. 2007. Forage Soybean Performance in Mediterranean Environments. Field Crops Research. 103: 239- 247.
• Açıkkgöz, E. 1982. Cold tolerance and its association with seedling morphology and chemical composition in annual forage legumes. II. Vetch (Vicia) species. Plant Breeding, 88: 278-286.
• Akgül, M., and Basayiğit, L. 2005. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Çiftlik arazisinin detaylı toprak etüdü ve haritalanması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi. Fen Bil. Enst. Derg. 9: 54-63.
• Albayrak, S., M. Türk and O. Yüksel. 2009. Effects of phosphorus fertilization and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of woolypod vetch. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 14(1): 30-40.
• Albayrak, S and Ö. Töngel. 2006. Path analyses of yield and yieldrelated traits of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) under different rainfall conditions. OMU. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 21(1) 27-32.
• Albayrak, S., M. Güler, M.Ö. Töngel, 2004. Effects of seed rates on forage production and hay quality of vetch-triticale mixtures. Asian Journal of Plant Science. 3 (6): 752-756.
• Andrade, F.H., P. Calvino, A. Cirilo, and P. Barbieri. 2002. Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agron. J. 94:975–980.
• Anlarsal, A.E. 1996. The effect of different cutting stages and seeding rates on forage and sed yields of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Turkish journal of Argic. And Forestry. 20:529-534.
• Aydın, N., Mut, Z., Mut, H., and Đ. Ayan. 2010. Effect of autumn and spring sowing dates on hay yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 9(10): 1539-1545.
• Asanome, N., and T. Ikeda, 1998: Effect of branch direction’s arrangement on soybean yield and yield components. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 181, 95–102.
• Boquet, D.J. 1990. Plant population density and row spacing effects on soybean at post-optimal planting dates. Agron. J. 82, 59–64.
• Bozkurt, Y., and I. Kaya. 2010. A research based evaluation of the natural grasslands within the aspect of sustainable livestock production systems in highlands of the eastern Turkey, J. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fac. 16 (6): 1045-1049.
• Bowers, G.R., J.L. Rabb, L.O. Ashlock, and J.B. Santini. 2000. Row spacing in the early soybean production system. Agron. J. 92, 524–531.
• Bullock, D., S. Khan, and A. Rayburn. 1998. Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth. Crop Sci. 38:1011–1016.
• De Bruin, J.L., and Pedersen, P., 2008. Effect of Row Spacing and Seeding Rate on Soybean Yield. Agron. J. 100:704-710.
• Gan, Y., I. Stolen, H. Van Keulen, and P.J.C. Kuiper. 2002. Physiological responses of soybean varieties to plant density. Field Crops Res. 74, 231–241.
• Herbert, S. J., and G. V. Litchfield, 1984: Growth response of shortseason soybean to variations in row spacing and density. Field Crops Res. 9, 163–171.
• Lone, B.A., Hassan, B., Ansur-ul-haq, S., and M.H. Khan. 2010. Effect of seed rate, row spacing and fertility levels on relative economics of soybean (glycine max. L.) under temperate conditions. African J. of Agric.Research. 5: 322-324.
• Rohweder, D.A., Barnes, R.F., and N. Jorgensen. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J. Anim. Sci. 47(3):747–759.
• Rowell, D.R. 1996. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman, Harlow.
• Shibles, R.M., and C.R. Weber. 1966. Interception of solar radiation and dry matter production by various soybean planting patterns. Crop Sci. 6:55-59.
• Turk, M.A., A.M. Tawaha and M.K.J. El-Shatnawi. 2003. Response of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) to Plant Density, Sowing Date,Phosphorus Fertilization and Ethephon Application in the Absence of Moisture Stress J. Agronomy and Crop Sc. 189, 1-6.
• Türk, M., Albayrak, S and O.Yüksel. 2007. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilization and Harvesting Stages on Forage Yield and Quality of Narbon Vetch. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 50(4): 457-462.
• Türk, M., Albayrak, S and O. Yüksel. 2009. Effects of fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of hairy vetch. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 52(3):269-275.
• Uzun, A., Bilgili, U., Sincik, M., and Açıkgöz, E. 2004. Effects of Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Hungarian Vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.). Turk J Agric For. 28. 179-182.
• Van Soest, P.J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant: Ruminant metabolism, nutritional strategies, the cellulolytic fermentation and the chemistry of forages and plant fibers. O &B Books, Corvallis, OR. USA.
• Weber, C.R., R.M. Shibles, and D.E. Byth. 1966. Eff ect of plant population and row spacing on soybean development and production. Agron. J. 58:99-102.
• Yılmaz, S. 2008. Effects of Increased Phosphorus Rates and Plant Densities on Yield and Yield-Related Traits of Narbon Vetch Lines. Turk J Agric For 32: 49-56.
• Yunusa, I.A.M., and M.C. Ikawelle. 1990. Yield response of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) to planting density and row spacing in a semi-arid tropical environment. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 164, 282–288.