Effect of rhizobia, nitrogen and weeds on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain protein and oil content

Effect of rhizobia, nitrogen and weeds on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grain protein and oil content

Application, of nitrogen fertilizers and Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation in soybean has different effects on seed protein and oil. Complexity of this field of research increases with weed interference. In order to study of these effects on soybean, a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications, was carried, out at research fields, University of Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Two varieties of soybean, Williams and Harcor, were grown at the field in 2004. Fertilizer treatments were applied in four levels. Weeds were controlled by hand weeding up to the end of the critical period of soybean as one level of weed treatment and weedy plots were the other level. Results showed that Williams had high protein content while Harcor had high oil content. Biological nitrogen fixation as the single source of nitrogen fertilizer decreased the soybean grain protein and increased oil percent. On the other hand, application of urea in four different payments of urea topdressing, increased grain protein about-13%. Weed infestation in inoculated plots increased significantly grain protein content but in urea applied plots results were reversed. Grain oil percent had reverse order in comparison with protein content.

___

  • 1.Corre-Hellou G, and Crozat Y. 2004. N2 fixation and N supply in organic pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping systems as affected by weeds and pea weevil (Sitona lineatus L.). Europ. J. Agronomy,(in press).
  • 2.Delin S, Linden B, and Berglund K. 2005. Yield and protein response to fertilizer nitrogen in different parts of a cereal field: potential of site-specific fertilization. Europ. J. Agronomy. 22:325-336.
  • 3.Fehr WR, and Caviness CE. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Spec. Rep. 80. Iowa Agric. Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Iowa State Univ., Ames.
  • 4.Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, and Jensen ES. 200İ. Interspecific competition, N use interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crops Research. 70:101-109.
  • 5.Hayati R, Egli BD, and. Crafts-Brandner SJ. 1995. Carbon and Nitrogen Supply during seed filling and leaf senescence in soybean. Crop Sci. 35:1063-1069.
  • 6.Jensen ES. 1996a. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil. 182:25-38.
  • 7.Knezevic ZS, Evans PS, and Mainz M. 2003. Row spacing influences the Critical Timing for weed removal in Soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 17:666-673.
  • 8.Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly öf the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature: 105-114.
  • 9.Marcone FM. 1999. Biochemical and biophysical properties of plant storage proteins: a current understanding with emphasis on US seed globulins. Food Research International. 32:79-92.
  • 10.Nakasathein S, Israel WD, Wilson FR, arid Kwanyuen P. 2000. Regulation of seed protein concentration in Soybean by Supra-optimal nitrogen supply. Crop Sci. 40:1277-1284.
  • 11.Paek CN, Imsande J, Shoemaker CR, and Shibles R. 1997. Nutritional Control of Soybean seed storage protein. Crop Sci. 37:498-503.
  • 12.Schmitt AM, Lamb AJ, Randall WG, Orf HJ, and Rehm WG. 2001. In-season fertilizer nitrogen applications for Soybean in Minnesota. Agron.J. 93:983-988.
  • 13.Sexton PJ, Paek NC, and Shibles R. 1998. Soybean sulfur and nitrogen balance varying levels of available sulfur. Crop Sci. 38:975-982.
  • 14.Vasilas BL, Nelson RL, Fuhrmann JJ, and Evans TA. 1995. Relationship of Nitrogen Utilization Patterns with Soybean Yield and Seed-Fill Period. Crop Sci. 35:809-813.