DEVELOPMENT OF MAIZE GENOTYPES (Zea mays L.) BY USING IN VIVO DOUBLED HAPLOID TECHNIQUE

Doubled haploid technology has become an increasingly popular and important tool for developing new maize lines (Zea mays L.) breeding. Conventional maize breeding requires repeated self-pollination for about six to ten generations to obtain homozygous inbred lines. Completely homozygous lines can be produced in only two generations by using doubled haploid technology. In vivo induction of the maternal haploid method was used for the production of doubled haploid lines. 32 different donors pollinated with haploid inducer line Stock6. Haploid seeds were identified visually by using dominant anthocyanin color marker genes R1-nj. Haploid induction rates (HIR) and chromosome doubling rate (CDR) were determined. 488 putative haploid seeds were obtained. The average haploid induction rate was calculated as 2.0%, the average chromosome doubling rate was 52,3%. Results of this study 20 doubled haploid lines were developed.

Keywords:

doubled haploid, haploid induction rate in vivo, maize breeding,

PDF

___

Auger, D.L., T.S. Ream and J.A. Bırchler. 2004. A test for a metastable epigenetic component of heterosis using haploid induction in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1017-1023.
Cengiz, R. and K.Z. Korkut. 2020. Development of doubled haploid maize lines by using in vivo haploid technique. Biotech Studies 29(1): 1-7
Cerit, I., G. Comertpay, R. Oyucu, B. Cakır, R. Hatipoglu and H. Ozkan. 2016. Determination of haploid induction rates of different inducer lines used for in-vivo doubled haploid technique in hybrid maize breeding. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute. 25 (Special issue-1): 52-57 (in Turkish).
Chaikam, V., W. Molenaar, A.E. Melchinger and P.M. Boddupalli. 2019. Doubled haploid technology for line development in maize: technical advances and prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132: 3227–3243.
Chang, M.T. and E.H. Coe. 2009. Doubled haploids. In: Molecular Genetic Approaches to Maize Improvement, ed. Kriz, A.L. and Larkins, B.A., 127–142, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Chase, S.S. 1949. Monoploid frequencies in commercial double cross hybrid maize, and in its component single cross hybrids and inbred lines. Genetics 34: 328–332.
Coe, E.H. 1959. A line of maize with high haploid frequency. American Naturalist 93: 381–382.
Coe, E.H. and K.R. Sarkar. 1964. The detection of haploids in maize. Journal of Heredity. 55: 231-233.
Deimling S., F. Rober and H.H. Geiger. 1997. Methodik und genetik der in vivo haploiden induktion bei mais. Votr Pflanzenzüchtg 38: 203-224.
De La Fuente, G.N., U.K. Frei, B. Trampe, D. Nettleton, W. Zhang and T. Lubberstedt. 2018. A Diallel analysis of a maize donor population response to in vivo maternal haploid induction I: Inducibility. Crop Sci. 58: 1830–1837.
Dong, X., X. Xu, J. Miao, L. Li, D. Zhang, X. Mi, C. Liu, X. Tian, A.E. Melchinger and S. Chen. 2013. Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126: 1713–1720.
Eder, J. and S.T. Chalyk. 2002. In vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 703-708.
Gayen, P., J.K. Madan, R. Kumar and K.R. Sarkar.1994. Chromosome doubling in haploids through colchisine. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsletter 68: 65.
Geiger, H.H. 2009. Doubled haploids. In: Maize handbook - volume II: genetics and genomics, eds. Bennetzen, J.L. and Hake, S., 641-657, Springer Science and Business Media, New York.
Geiger, H.H. and G.A. Gordillo. 2010. Doubled haploids in hybrıd maize breeding. University of Hohenheim, Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population Genetics, 70593
Stuttgart, Germany. Maydica 54: 485-499. Kalinowska, K., S. Chamas, K. Unkel, D. Demidov, I. Lermontova, T. Dresselhaus, J. Kumlehn, F. Dunemann and A. Houben. 2019. State-of-the-art and novel developments of in vivo haploid technologies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132: 593– 605.
Kusaksiz, T. and E.K. Kusaksiz. 2018. The performances of some new dent maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars grown as main crop in a Mediterranean environment. Turk. J. Field Crops. 23(2): 187-194.
Lashermes, P. and M. Beckert. 1988. Genetic control of maternal haploidy in maize (Zea Mays L.) and selection of haploid inducing lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 405–410.
Mansfield, B.D. and R.H. Mumm. 2014. Survey of plant density tolerance in U.S. maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 54: 157-173.
Melchinger, AE., PC. Brauner, J. Bohm and W. Schipprack. 2016. In vivo haploid induction in maize: comparison of different testing regimes for measuring haploid induction rates. Crop Sci. 56: 1127–1135.
Meng, D., H. Luo, Z. Dong, W. Huang, F. Liu, F. Li, S. Chen, H. Yu and W. Jin. 2022. Overexpression of Modified CENH3 in Maize Stock6-Derived Inducer Lines Can Effectively Improve Maternal Haploid Induction Rates. Front. Plant Sci. 13:892055.
Ren, J., P. Wu, B. Trampe, X. Tian, T. Lubberstedt and S. Chen. 2017. Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15: 1361–1370.
Rotarenco, V.A. 2002. Production of matroclinous maize haploids following natural and artificial pollination with a haploid inducer. Maize Genet. Coop. News Lett. 76: 16.
Rotarenco, V.A., G. Dicu, D. State and S. Fuia. 2010. New inducers of maternal haploids in maize. Maize Genet. Coop. News Lett. 84: 15.
Röber, F.K., G.A. Gordillo and H.H. Geiger. 2005. In vivo haploid induction in maize performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50: 275–283.
Wang, B., L. Zhu, B. Zhao, Y. Zhao, Y. Xie, Z. Zheng, Y. Li, J. Sun and H. Wang. 2019. Development of a haploid-inducer mediated genome editing system for accelerating maize breeding. Mol. Plant. 12(4): 597–602.
Uliana Trentin, H., G. Batiru, U.K. Frei, S. Duttaand and T. Lubberstedt. 2022. Investigating the effect of the interaction of maize inducer and donor backgrounds on haploid induction rates. Plants 11: 1527.
Zararsız, D., S. Yanıkoglu, L. Ozturk, I. Turgut, S. Kizik and B. Bilgin. 2019. Production of double haploid plants using in vivo haploid techniques in maize. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(1): 62-69.