DETERMINING YIELD STABILITY AND MODEL SELECTION BY AMMI METHOD IN RAIN-FED DURUM WHEAT GENOTYPES
Selection of durum wheat genotypes with wide adaptability across various environments is important before recommending them to reach a high rate of genotype adoption. Multi-environment grain yield trials of 20 durum wheat genotypes were conducted at five locations of Iran (Gachsaran, Gonbad, Moghan, Ilam and Khorram abad) over four years (2009-2013). Combined ANOVA of yield data of the 20 environments revealed highly significant differences among genotypes and environments as well as significant GE interaction indicated differential performance of genotypes over test environments. Results of F Ratio indicated that only five interaction principal components (IPCs) were significant at the 0.01 probability level. Also, the GE interaction is comprised of 29.7% noise and 70.03% signal. According to these distinct numbers of significant axes, fourteen AMMI stability parameters were computed. Finally according to the most of type 1 of AMMI parameters (EV1, AMGE1, SIPC1 and D1), genotypes G8, G17 and G11; based on the type 2 of AMMI parameters and ASV, genotypes G4, G5, G10, G11 and G17; due to type 3 of AMMI parameters and MASV, genotypes G8, G10 and G12 were detected as the most stable genotypes. Considering all of the AMMI stability parameters, genotypes G8, G10, G11, G12 and G17 following to genotypes G7 and G9 were the most stable genotypes. The best recommended genotypes according to the present study are G10 with 3470 kg ha-1 grain yield for Gachsaran and Khorramabad, G12 with 3343 kg ha-1 grain yield for Ilam and G10 and G12 for Moghan and Gonbad regions wich had high mean yield and were most stable for related mega-environments.
___
- Adugna, W. and M.T. Labuschagne. 2002. Genotype ×
environment interactions and phenotypic stability analyses of
linseed in Ethiopia. Plant Breed. 121:66-71.
- Akbarpour, O., H. Dehghani, B. Sorkhi and G. Guach. 2014.
Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction in Barley
(Hordeum Vulgare L.) Based on AMMI model Using
Developed SAS Program. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 16: 919-930.
- Akcura, M., Y. Kaya and S. Taner. 2009. Evaluation of durum
wheat genotypes using parametric and nonparametric
stability statistics. Turk. J. Field Crop. 14(2): 111-122.
- Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of
genotype × environment interactions for cereals in Italy.
Euphytica 94:53-62.
- Annicchiarico, P. 2002. Genotype × environment interaction:
challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar
recommendations, Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations.
- Becker, H.C. 1981. Correlations among some statistical
measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 30: 835–840.
Becker, H.C. and J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant
breeding. Plant Breed. 101:1-23.
- Bertero H.D., A.J.G. dela Vega Correa, S.E. Jacobsen and A.
Mujic. 2004. Genotype and genotype-by-environment
interaction effects for grain yield seed yield and grain size of
quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) as revealed by pattern
analysis of international multi-environment trials. Field
Crops Res. 89: 299-318.
- Burgueño, J., J. Crossa and M. Vargas. 2000. SAS programs for
graphing GE and GGE biplots. Biometrics and Statistics
Unit, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo
(CIMMYT), México.
- Cooper, M., D.R. Woodruff, R.L. Eisemann, P.S. Brennan and
I.H. DeLacy. 1995. A selection strategy to accommodate
genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield, seed
yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among
genotypes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 492-502.
- Cornelius, P.L. 1993. Statistical tests and retention of terms in
the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction
model for cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 33: 1186–1193.
- Cornelius, P.L., J. Crossa and M. Seyedsadr. 1996. Statistical
tests and estimators of multiplicative models for cultivar
trials. In: Kang, M.S. and Gauch, H.G., Jr (eds) Genotypeby-Environment
Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
Florida, pp. 199–234.
- Dehghani, H., S.H. Sabaghpour and A. Ebadi. 2010. Study of
genotype × environment interaction for chickpea yield in
Iran. Agron. J. 102: 1-8.
- Ebdon, J.S. and H.G. Gauch. 2002. AMMI analysis of national
turfgrass
performance trials. II. cultivar recommendations. Crop Sci.
42: 497–506 11.
- Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for
comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36-40.
Finlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of
adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aus. J. Agric.
Res. 14: 742-754.
- Fisher, R.A. and W.A. MacKenzie. 1923. Studies in variation II.
The manorial response in different potato varieties. J. Agric.
Sci. 13: 311-320.
- Gabriel, K.R. 1978. Least squares approximation of matrices by
additive and multiplicative models. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 40:
186-196.
- Gauch, H.G. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials
with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
- Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield
trials. In Kang, M.S., Gauch, H.G. (ed.) Genotype by
environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying megaenvironments
and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37: 311-
326.
- Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI
and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1488-1500.
- Gauch, H.G., H.P. Piepho and P. Annicchiarico. 2008. Statistical
analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Further
considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866-889.
- Gollob, H.F. 1968. A statistical model which combines features
of factor analysis and analysis of variance techniques.
Psychometrika 33: 73-115.
- Ilker, E., H. Geren, R. Unsal, I. Sevim, F. Aykut Tonk, and M.
Tosun. 2011. AMMI-biplot analysis of yield performances
of bread wheat cultivars grown at different locations. Turk J
Field Crops. 16(1): 64-68.
- Iwata H., H. Nesumi, S. Ninomiya, Y. Takano, and Y. Ukai.
2002. The evaluation of genotype × environment interactions
of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and elliptic
fourier descriptors. Breeding Sci. 52: 243–251.
- Johnson, D.E. and F.A. Graybill. 1972. An analysis of a two-way
model with interaction and no replication. J. Am. Stat.
Assoc. 67: 862–868.
- Kang, M.S., 1998. Using genotype by environment interaction
for crop cultivar development. Adv. Agron. 35: 199-240.
- Karimizadeh, R. and M. Mohammadi, M. 2010. AMMI
adjustment for rainfed lentil yield trials in Iran. Bul. J. Agric.
Sci. 16: 66-73.
- Karimizadeh, R., M. Mohammadi, M. Armion, M.K. Shefazadeh
and, H. Chalajour. 2012a. Determining heritability,
reliability and stability of grain yield and yield-related
components in durum wheat (Triticum durum L.). Bul. J.
Agric. Sci. 18(4): 595-607.
- Karimizadeh, R., M. Mohammadi, M.K. Shefazadeh, A.A.
Mahmoodi, B. Rostami, and F. Karimpour. 2012b.
Relationship among and repeatability of ten stability indices
for grain yield of food lentil genotypes in Iran. Turk. J. Field
Crops. 17(1): 51-61.
- Mandel, J. 1961. Non-additivity in two-way analysis of variance.
J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56: 878-888.
- Mandel, J. 1971. New analysis of variance model for nonadditive
data. Technometrics 13:1-18.
- Mladenov, V., B. Banjac, and M. Milosevic. 2012. Evaluation of
Yield and Seed Requirements Stability of Bread Wheat
(Triticum aestivum L.) Via AMMI Model. Turk. J. Field
Crops. 17(2): 203-207.
- Mohammadi, M., P. Sharifi, R. Karimizadeh, J.A. Jafarby, H.
Khanzadeh, T. Hosseinpour, M.M. Poursiabidi, M. Roustaii,
M. Hassanpour Hosni, and P. Mohammadi. 2015. Stability
of grain yield of durum wheat genotypes by AMMI model.
Agric. For. 61(3): 181-193.
- Mohammadi, M., R. Karimizadeh, N. Sabaghnia, and M.K.
Shefazadeh. 2012. Genotype × Environment Interaction and
Yield Stability Analysis of New Improved Bread Wheat
Genotypes. Turk. J. Field Crop. 17(1): 67-73.
- Moreno-Gonzalez, J., J. Crossa and P.L. Cornelius. 2003.
Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Model.
I. Theory on Variance Components for Predicting Cell
Means. Crop Sci. 43: 1967-1975.
- Nachit, M.M. 1992. Use of AMMI and linear regression models
to analyze genotype environment interaction in durum
wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 597-601.
- Payne, R.W., D.A. Murray, S.A. Harding, D.B. Baird, and D.M.
Soutar. 2009. GenStat for Windows (12th Edition)
Introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead.
- Purchase, J. L. 1997. Parametric analysis to describe G × E
interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. Ph.D. thesis.
Dep. of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Univ. of the
Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
- Sabaghnia, N., H. Dehghani and S.H. Sabaghpour. 2006.
Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype ×
environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci 46:
1100-1106.
- Sabaghnia, N., S.H. Sabaghpour and H. Dehghani, 2008. The use
of an AMMI model and its parameters to analyze yield
stability in multi-environment trials. J. Agric. Sci. 146:571-
581.
- Sabaghnia, N., M. Mohammadi and R. Karimizadeh, 2012a. The
evaluation of genotype × environment interactions of durum
wheat’s yield using of the AMMI model. Agric. For. 55(9):
5-21.
- Sabaghnia, N., R. Karimizadeh and M. Mohammadi. 2012b.
Model selection in additive main effect and multiplicative
interaction model in durum wheat. Genetika 44(2): 325-339.
- Sabaghnia, N., M. Mohammadi and R. Karimizadeh. 2013.
Parameters of AMMI model for yield stability analysis in
durum wheat. Agric. Con. Sci. 78(2): 119-124.
- Sneller, C.H., L. Kilgore-Norquest and D. Dombek. 1997.
Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop
Sci. 37: 383–390.
- Solomon, K.F., H.A. Smit, E. Malan and W.J. Du Toit. 2008.
Parametric model based assessment of genotype ×
environment interactions for grain yield in durum wheat
under irrigation. Int. J. Plant Pro. 2(1): 23-26.
- Tukey, J.W. 1949. One degree of freedom for non-additivity.
Biometrics 5: 232–242.
- Williams, E.J. 1952. The interpretation of interactions in
factorial experiments. Biometrika 39:65-81.
- Wold, S. 1978. Cross-validatory Estimation of the Number of
Components in Factor and Principal Component Models.
Technometrics 20: 397-405.
- Yan, W., L.A., Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar
evaluation and mega–environment investigations based on
the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40: 597-605.
- Yates, F. and W.G. Cochran. 1938. The analysis of groups of
experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 28: 556–580.
- Yau, S.K. 1995. Regression and AMMI analyses of genotype ×
environment interactions: An empirical comparison. Agron.
J. 87: 121–126.
- Yue, G., K.L. Roozeboom, W.T. Schapaughjr and G.H. Liang.
1997. Evaluation of soybean cultivars using parametric and
nonparametric stability estimates. Plant Breed. 116:271-275.
- Zali, H., E. Farshadfar, S.H. Sabaghpour and R. Karimizadeh.
2012. Evaluation of genotype× environment interaction in
chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model.
Annal. Bio. Res. 3(7): 3126-3136.
- Zobel, R.W. 1994. Stress resistance and root systems. p. 80–99.
In Proc. Of the Workshop on Adaptation of Plants to Soil
Stress. 1–4 Aug. 1993. INTSORMIL Publ. 94–2. Inst. of
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Univ. of Nebraska,
Lincoln.
- Zobel, R.W., M.J. Wright and H.G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical
analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80:388-393.