COMPETITIVE INTERACTION BETWEEN MIXED-PLANTING MAIZE CULTIVARS ENHANCED YIELD AND WATER-USE EFFICIENCY IN A SEMI-ARID REGION
Effects of competitive interaction between two mixed planting maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars on yield andwater use efficiency are inevitable and the positive process needs more excavation. Two maize cultivars weremixed planting in two densities to explicit the potential of competitive interaction improving yield and wateruse efficiency in a semi-arid region over two growing seasons. During grain filling stage firstly, competitiveinteraction optimized stem to leaf ratio of two maize cultivars, and decreased root to shoot ratio at harvestunder the same-high mixed planting density, great competitive intensity caused by high planting densitysuppressed vegetative growth of maize. Secondly, land equivalent ratio positively increased from 1.02 to 1.14,which signified the advantage of farming land use. Furthermore, positive values of total actual yield loss in thefour mixed systems indicated a yield advantage. Over two years, mean yield and water use efficiency increasedby 6.5 % and 11.7 % which resulted from the positive performance of two maize cultivars in the mixedsystems. Thus, consequences of competitive interaction in the mixed planting systems performed as land use,maize yield and water use efficiency advantages in the dry land farming.
___
- Acciaresi, H.A and J.J. Guiamet. 2010. Below- and
above-ground growth and biomass allocation in maize and
Sorghum halepense in response to soil water competition.
Weed Res. 50: 481-492.
- Adiku, S.G.K., H. Ozier-Lafontaine and T. Bajazet. 2001.
Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize-cowpea
mixture grown under greenhouse conditions. Plant Soil 235:
85-94.
- Agegnehu, G., A. Ghizaw and W. Sinebo. 2006. Yield
performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean
mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J Agron. 25:
202-207.
- Awal, M., H. Koshi and T. Ikeda. 2006. Radiation interception
and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agri Forest
Meteorol. 139: 74-83.
- Awal, M., M. Pramanik and M. Hossen. 2007. Interspecies
competition, growth and yield in barley-peanut intercropping.
Asia J Plant Sci. 6: 577-584.
- Blackman, P. and W. Davies. 1985. Root to shoot
communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J
Exp Bot. 36. 39-48.
- Braconnier, S. 1998. Maize-coconut intercropping: effects of
shade and root competition on maize growth and yield.
Agrono. 18. 373-382.
- Burton, P. 1993. Some limitations inherent to static indexes of
plant competition. Cana J Forest Res. 23: 2141-2152.
- Caballero, R., A. Bustos and R. Roman. 2001. Soil salinity under
traditional and improved irrigation schedules in central Spain.
Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 65. 1210-1218.
- Dahmardeh, M. 2011. Effect of plant density and nitrogen rate
on PAR absorption and maize yield. Amer. J. of Plant Phy. 6.
44-49.
- Dahmardeh, M. 2013. Intercropping two varieties of maize (Zea
mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Biomass yield
and intercropping advantages. Int. J. Agri. Forest. 3: 7-11.
- Dubrovsky, J.G and B.G. Forde. 2012. Quantitative analysis of
lateral root development: Pitfalls and how to avoid them.
Plant Cell. 24: 4-14.
- Fang, Y., B.C. Xu, L. Liu, Y.J. Gu, Q.Q. Liu, N.C. Turner and
F.M. Li. 2014. Does a mixture of old and modern winter
wheat cultivars increase yield and water use efficiency in
water-limited environments? Field Crop Res. 156: 12-21.
- Fan, Z., Q. Chai, G. Huang, A. Yu, P. Huang, C. Yang, Z. Tao
and H. Liu. 2013. Yield and water consumption
characteristics of wheat/maize intercropping with reduced
tillage in an Oasis region. Eur. J. Agrono. 45. 52-58.
- Gong, Z.T., G.L. Zhang and Z.C. Chen. 2007. Pedogenesis and
soil taxonomy. Beijing Sci. Press Publ., Beijing. (In Chinese)
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., M.K. Anderson, B. Joernsgaard and E.S.
Jensen. 2006. Density and relative frequency effects on
competitive interactions and resource use in pea-barley
intercrops. Field Crop Rse. 95: 256-267.
- Ionenko, I.F., N.R. Dautova and A.V. Anisimov. 2012. Early
changes of water diffusional transfer in maize roots under
the influence of water stress. Env. Exp. Bot. 76: 16-23.
- Jaggi, S., D.P. Handa, A.S. G ill and N.P. Singh. 2004.
Land-equivalent ratio for assessing yield advantages from
agroforestry experiment. Ind. J Agri. Sci. 74. 76-79.
- Li, P.F., B.L. Ma, W.K.Yan, Z.G. Cheng, F.M. Li and Y.C.
Xiong. 2015. Plant architecture, plasticity, and adaption
strategies of two oat genotypes under different competition
interstities. J. Sci. Food Agri. 96: 1431-1439.
- Li, L., J. Sun, F.S. Zhang, T. Guo, X. Bao, F.A. Smith and S.E.
Smith. 2006. Root distribution and interactions between
intercropped species. Oecologia 147: 280-290.
- Li, L., J.H. Sun and F.S. Zhang. 2011. Intercropping with wheat
leads to greater root weight density and larger below-ground
space of irrigated maize at late growth stages. Soil Sci. Plant
Nutr. 57: 61-67.
- Lithourgidis, A.S., C.A. Dordas, C.A. Damalas and D.N.
Vlachostergios. 2011a. Annual intercrops: An alternative
pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5:
396-410.
- Lithourgidis, A.S., D.N. Vlachostergios, C.A. Dordas and C.A.
Damalas. 2011b. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and
competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. Eur. J.
Agrono. 34: 287-294.
- Mead, R and R.Willey. 1980. The concept of a ‘land equivalent
ratio’and advantages in yields from intercropping. Expe Agri.
16: 217-228.
- Morris, R and D.P. Garrity. 1993. Resource capture and
utilization in intercropping: water. Field Crop Res. 34:
303-317.
- Mushagalusa, G.N., J.F. Ledent and X. Draye. 2008. Shoot and
root competition in potato/maize intercropping: Effects on
growth and yield. Env. Exp. Bot. 64: 180-188.
- Nassab, A.D.M., T. Amon and H.P. Kaul. 2011. Competition
and yield in intercrops of maize and sunflower for biogas.
Indu Crop Prod. 34: 1203-1211.
- Neykova, N., J. Obando, R. Schneider, C. Shisanya, S.
Thiele-Bruhn and F.M. Thomas. 2011. Vertical root
distribution in single-crop and intercropping agricultural
systems in Central Kenya. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 174:
742-749.
- Page, E.R., M. Tollenaar, E.A. Lee, L. Lukens and C.J. Swanton.
2010. Timing, effect, and recovery from intraspecific
competition in maize. Agrono. J. 102: 1007-1013.
- Peng, Y., P. Yu, Y. Zhang, G. Sun., P. Ning, X . Li and C .Li.
2012. Temporal and spatial dynamics in root length density
of field-grown maize and NPK in the soil profile. Field CropRes. 131: 9-16.
- Polthanee, A and A. Kotchasatit. 1999. Growth, yield and
nutrient content of cassava and mungbean grown under
intercropping. Pak. J. Bio. Sci. 2: 871-879.
- Prince, S., J .Haskett, M. Steininger, H. Strand and R. Wright.
2001. Net primary production of US Midwest croplands
from agricultural harvest yield data. Ecol. App.11: 1194–
1205
- Ren, Y.Y., J.J. Liu, Z.L. Wang and S.Q. Zhang. 2016. Planting
density and sowing proportions of maize-soybean intercrops
affected competitive interactions and water-use efficiencies
on the Loess Plateau, China. Eur. J. Agrono. 72: 70-79.
- Rossini, M.A., G.A. Maddonni and M.E. Otegui. 2011.
Inter-plant competition for resources in maize crops grown
under contrasting nitrogen supply and density: Variability in
plant and ear growth. Field Crop Res. 121: 373-380.
- Rossini, M.A., G.A. Maddonni and M.E. Otegui. 2012.
Inter-plant variability in maize crops grown under
contrasting N x stand density combinations: Links between
development, growth and kernel set. Field Crop Res. 133:
90-100.
- Schenk, H.J. 2006. Root competition: Beyond resource depletion.
J. Ecol. 94: 725-739.
- Seran, T.H. and I. Brintha. 2010. Review on maize based
intercropping. J. Agrono. 9: 135-145.
- Temesgen, A., S. Fukai and R. Daniel. 2015. as the level of crop
productivity increases: is there a role for intercropping in
smallholder agriculture. Field Crop Res. 180: 155-166.
- Thorsted, M.D., J. Weiner and J.E. Olesen. 2006. Above- and
below-ground competition between intercropped winter
wheat Triticum aestivum and white clover Trifolium repens.
J. App. Ecol. 43: 237-245.
- Van Ossterom, E.J., G.J. O'leary, P.S. Carberry and P.Q.
Craufurd. 2002. Simulating growth, development and yield
of tillering pearl millet. III. Biomass accumulation and
partitioning. Field Crop Res. 79: 85-106.
- Weigelt, A. and P. Jolliffe. 2003. Indices of plant competition. J.
Ecol. 91: 707-720.
- Westgate, M. and J. Boyer. 1985. Osmotic adjustment and the
inhibition of leaf, root, stem and silk growth at low water
potentials in maize. Planta 164: 540-549.
- Williams. M. and R.Boydston. 2013. Intraspecific and
interspecific competition in sweet corn. Agrono. J. 105:
503-508.
- Wilson, J.B. 1988a. A review of evidence on the control of shoot:
root ratio, in relation to models. Ann. Bot. 61: 433-449.
- Wilson. J.B. 1988b. Shoot competition and root competition. J.
App. Ecol. 25: 279-296.
- Xia, H.Y., J.H. Zhao, J.H. Sun, X.G. Bao, P. Christie, F.S.
Zhang and L. Li. 2013. Dynamics of root length and
distribution and shoot biomass of maize as affected by
intercropping with different companion crops and
phosphorus application rates. Field Crop Res. 150: 52-62.
- Yang, C.H., G.B. Huang, Q. Chai and Z.X. Luo. 2011. Water use
and yield of wheat/maize intercropping under alternate
irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China. Field Crop
Res. 124: 426-432.
- Yang, W., Z. Li, J. Wang, P. Wu and Y. Zhang. 2013. Crop yield,
nitrogen acquisition and sugarcane quality as affected by
interspecific competition and nitrogen application. Field
Crop Res. 146: 44-50.
- Zhang, F.S. and L. Li. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative
interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop
productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248:
305-312.
- Zhang, G., Z. Yang and S. Dong. 2011. Interspecific
competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa
and corn intercropping system. Field Crop Res. 124: 66-73.
- Zhang, W.P., X. Jia, E.C. Morris, Y.Y. Bai and G.X. Wang.
2012. Stem, branch and leaf biomass-density relationships in
forest communities. Ecol. Res. 27: 819-825.