Abbas SHARIFI NASAB ANARI, Mehdi EHSAN, Mahmud FOTUHI FIRUZABAD

The impact of demand response programs on UPFC placement

Demand response (DR) and flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices can be effectively used forcongestion management in power transmission systems. However, demand response program (DRP) implementationcan itself affect the optimum location of FACTS devices, which is one of the main issues in power system planning.This paper investigates the impact of DRPs on unified power flow controller (UPFC) placement. The harmony searchalgorithm is employed to determine the optimum locations and parameter setting of UPFC in a long-term framework.The optimization problem is solved with different objectives including generation and congestion cost reduction, as wellas loss reduction. In this paper, the proposed approach is analyzed using 5 different cases, which are defined in such away that they demonstrate the impact of DRPs on the UPFC placement problem. The IEEE reliability test system isused as an illustrative example to demonstrate the necessity of considering DRPs for UPFC placement.

PDF

___

[1] Khaleghifar N, Amadeh H, Rezaeian Koochi MH. Residential electricity pricing using time-varying and non-timevarying scenarios: an application of game theory. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2016; 24: 2469-2482.
[2] Eremia M, Liu CC, Edris AA. Advanced Solutions in Power Systems: HVDC, FACTS, and Artificial Intelligence. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[3] Ziaee O, Choobineh F. Optimal location-allocation of TCSC devices on a transmission network. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2017; 32: 94-102.
[4] Yang GY, Hovland G, Majumder R, Dong ZY. TCSC allocation based on line flow based equations via mixed-integer programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007; 22: 2262-2269.
[5] Lashkarara A, Kazemi A, Niaki S. Multiobjective optimal location of FACTS shunt-series controllers for power system operation planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 2012; 27: 481-490.
[6] Lashkarara A, Kazemi A, Behshad M. Improving power systems operation through multiobjective optimal location of optimal unifed power flow controller. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2013; 21: 1893-1908.
[7] Acharya N, Mithulananthan N. Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research 2006; 77: 352-360.
[8] Reddy AK, Singh SP. Congestion mitigation using UPFC. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2016; 10: 2433-2442.
[9] Ghahremani E, Kamwa I. Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2013; 28: 764-778.
[10] Ghahremani E, Kamwa I. Analysing the effects of different types of FACTS devices on the steady-state performance of the Hydro-Québec network. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2014; 8: 233-249.
[11] Saravanan M, Slochanal SMR, Venkatesh P, Abraham PS. Application of PSO technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electric Power Systems Research 2007; 77: 276-283.
[12] Benabid R, Boudour M, Abido MA. Optimal location and setting of SVC and TCSC devices using non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization. Electric Power Systems Research 2009; 79: 1668-1677.
[13] Wibowo R, Yorino N, Eghbal M, Zoka Y, Sasaki Y. FACTS devices allocation with control coordination considering congestion relief and voltage stability. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2011; 26: 2302-2310.
[14] Farahmand H, Rashidinejad M, Mousavi A, Gharaveisi AA, Irving MR et al. Hybrid mutation particle swarm optimisation method for available transfer capability enhancement. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2012; 42: 240-249.
[15] Galloway SJ, Elders IM, Burt GM, Sookananta B. Optimal flexible alternative current transmission system device allocation under system fluctuations due to demand and renewable generation. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2010; 4: 725-735.
[16] Shaheen HI, Rashed GI, Cheng SJ. Optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC for enhancing power system security based on differential evolution algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2011; 33: 94-105.
[17] Taher SA, Amooshahi MK, Germond AJ. Optimal placement of UPFC in power systems using immune algorithm. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 2011; 19: 1399-1412.
[18] Alamelu S, Baskar S, Babulal CK, Jeyadevi S. Optimal siting and sizing of UPFC using evolutionary algorithms. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2015; 69: 222-231.
[19] Dutta S, Roy PK, Nandi D. Optimal location of UPFC controller in transmission network using hybrid chemical reaction optimization algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2015; 64: 194-211.
[20] Ranganathan S, Kalavathi MS, Rajan CA. Self-adaptive firefly algorithm based multi-objectives for multi-type FACTS placement. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2016; 10: 2576-2584.
[21] Zahid M, Chen J, Li Y, Duan X, Lei Q et al. New approach for optimal location and parameters setting of UPFC for enhancing power systems stability under contingency analysis. Energies 2017; 10: 1738.
[22] Dehnavi E, Abdi H, Mohammadi F. Dynamic economic dispatch problem integrated with demand response (DEDDR) considering nonlinear responsive load models. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 2016; 7: 2586-2595.
[23] Dehnavi E, Abdi H. Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem. Energy 2016; 109: 1086-1094.
[24] Shayesteh E, Parsa Moghaddam M, Taherynejhad S, Sheikh EL Eslami MK. Congestion management using demand response programs in power market. In: Power and Energy Society General Meeting; Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2008. pp. 1-8.
[25] Yousefi A, Nguyen TT, Zareipour H, Malik OP. Congestion management using demand response and FACTS devices. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2012; 37: 78-85.
[26] Kumar A, Sekhar C. DSM based congestion management in pool electricity markets with FACTS devices. Energy Procedia 2012; 14: 94-100.
[27] Dehnavi E, Abdi H. Determining optimal buses for implementing demand response as an effective congestion management method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2017; 32: 1537-1544.
[28] Shayesteh E, Yousefi A, Parsa Moghaddam M, Yousefi GR. An economic comparison between incorporation of FACTS devices and demand response programs for ATC enhancement. In: IEEE 2008 Electric Power Energy Conference; Vancouver, Canada; 2008. pp. 1-6.
[29] Rahmani Andebili M. Modeling nonlinear incentive-based and price-based demand response programs and implementing on real power markets. Electric Power Systems Research 2016; 132: 115-124.
[30] Su CL, Kirschen D. Quantifying the effect of demand response on electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2009; 24: 1199-1207.
[31] Aalami HA, Parsa Moghaddam M, Yousefi GR. Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Electric Power Systems Research 2010; 80: 426-435.
[32] Aalami HA, Parsa Moghaddam M, Yousefi GR. Demand response modeling considering interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs. Applied Energy 2010; 87: 243-250.
[33] Fang WL, Ngan H. A robust load flow technique for use in power systems with unified power flow controllers. Electric Power Systems Research 2000; 53: 181-186.
[34] Nguyen TT, Nguyen VL. Representation of line optimization control in unified power-flow controller model for power-flow analysis. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2007; 1: 714-723.
[35] Pereira M, Cera Zanetta L. A current based model for load flow studies with UPFC. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2013; 28: 677-682.
[36] Roh JH, Shahidehpour M, Fu Y. Market-based coordination of transmission and generation capacity planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007; 22: 1406-1419.
[37] Zimmermann RD, Sanchez CEM, Thomas RJ. Matpower: Steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2011; 26: 12-19.
[38] Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV. A new heuristic optimization algorithm-harmony search. Simulation 2001; 76: 60-68.
[39] Grigg C, Wong P, Albrecht P, Allan R, Bhavaraju M et al. IEEE reliability test system task force. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 1979; 6: 2047-2054.
[40] Ceylan O, Liu G, Tomsovic K. Coordinated distribution network control of tap changer transformers, capacitors and PV inverters. Electrical Engineering 2018; 100: 1133-1146.
[41] Ceylan O, Ozdemir A, Dag H. Heuristic methods for postoutage voltage magnitude calculations. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2016; 24: 105-120.
[42] Samadi M, Javidi MH, Ghazizadeh MS. The effect of time-based demand response program on LDC and reliability of power system. In: 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, Mashhad, Iran; 2013. pp. 1-6.