Reduction of PMUs via hybrid PMU-RTU communication changeover in the case of cyberattack on vulnerable power transmission lines

Reduction of PMUs via hybrid PMU-RTU communication changeover in the case of cyberattack on vulnerable power transmission lines

A power grid strictly depends on information and communication technology. The key role of real-timemeasurement and information control for the reliable operation of a power grid is the responsibility of the phasemeasurement units (PMUs). As smart power grids encounter a variety of unauthorized malicious accesses such ascyberattacks, PMU placement is an important problem. In this study, a new algorithm was proposed to specify theminimum number of PMUs in the case of cyberattacks on their communication lines and equipment. In order to analyzecomplete observability of the distribution system, a range of probable contingencies for the vulnerable lines of a typicalpower system was discussed. The proposed algorithm implementation shows that the number of required PMUs canbe reduced by removing irrelevant information through cyberattack circumstance intervals by using communicationequipment potential.

___

  • [1] Gopakumar P, Reddy MJB, Mohanta DK. Fault detection and localization methodology for self-healing in smart power grids incorporating phasor measurement units. Electr Pow Compo Sys 2015; 43: 695-710.
  • [2] Fan D, Centeno V. Phasor-based synchronized frequency measurement in power systems. IEEE T Power Deliver 2007; 22: 2010-2016.
  • [3] Abbasy NH, Ismail HM. A unified approach for the optimal PMU location for power system state estimation. IEEE T Power Syst 2009; 24: 806-813.
  • [4] Yang Q, Chang L, Yu W. On false data injection attacks against Kalman filtering in power system dynamic state estimation. Secur Commun Netw 2016; 9: 833-849.
  • [5] Deepika K, Rao GK, Kumar JV, Sankar RR. Fast and real-time algorithm to detect impending voltage instability. International Journal of Control Theory and Applications 2017; 10: 407-412.
  • [6] Billakanti S, Venkaiah C. An effective binary integer linear programmed approach for optimal placement of PMUs in power systems. In: IEEE 2014 International Conference on Smart Electric Grids; 19–20 September 2014; Guntur, India. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.
  • [7] Esmaili M, Gharani K, Shayanfar HA. Redundant observability PMU placement in the presence of flow measurements considering contingencies. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 3765-3773.
  • [8] Khare G, Sahu N, Sunitha R. Optimal PMU placement using matrix modification based integer linear programming. In: IEEE 2014 International Conference on Power and Computing Technologies; 20–21 March 2014; Nagercoil, India. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 632-636.
  • [9] Aminifar F, Khodaei A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Shahidehpour M. Contingency-constrained PMU placement in power networks. IEEE T Power Syst 2010; 25: 516-523.
  • [10] Allagui B, Aribia HB, Abdallah HH. Optimal placement of phasor measurement units by genetic algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energies and Vehicular Technology; 26–28 March 2012; Hammamet, Tunisia. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 434-439.
  • [11] Kumar S. Optimal placement of PMU using probabilistic approach. In: IEEE International Conference on Engineering and Computational Sciences; 6–8 March 2014; Chandigarh, India. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [12] Shepard DP, Humphreys TE, Fansler AA. Evaluation of the vulnerability of phasor measurement units to GPS spoofing attacks. Int J Crit Infr Prot 2012; 5: 146-153.
  • [13] Bhonsle J, Junghare A. Optimal placing of PMUs in a constrained grid: an approach. Turk J Electr Eng Co 2016; 24: 4508-4516.
  • [14] Fan Y, Zhang Z, Trinkle M, Dimitrovski AD, Song JB, Li H. A cross-layer defense mechanism against GPS spoofing attacks on PMUs in smart grids. IEEE T Smart Grid 2015; 6: 2659-2668.
  • [15] Jiang X, Zhang J, Harding BJ, Makela JJ, Domı AD. Spoofing GPS receiver clock offset of phasor measurement units. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 3253-3262.
  • [16] Watts D. Security and vulnerability in electric power systems. In: 35th North American Power Symposium; 20–21 October 2003; Rolla, MO, USA. pp. 559-566.
  • [17] Yang Q, An D, Min R, Yu W, Yang X, Zhao W. On optimal PMU placement-based defense against data integrity attacks in smart grid. IEEE T Inf Foren Sec 2017; 12: 1735-1750.
  • [18] Paudel S, Smith P, Zseby T. Data integrity attacks in smart grid wide area monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cyber Security Research; 23-25 August 2016; Belfast, UK. pp. 1-10.
  • [19] Ivanković I, Kuzle I, Holjevac N. Wide area information-based transmission system centralized out-of-step protection scheme. Energies 2017; 10: 633.
  • [20] Kerdchuen T, Ongsakul W. Optimal placement of PMU and RTU by hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for multiarea power system state estimation. In: International Conference on Technical Cooperation of Rajamangala Institute of Technology; 16–18 January 2009; Nakhonratchasima, Thailand. pp. 51-55.
  • [21] Hadley M, McBride J, Edgar T, Neil LO, Johnson J. Securing Wide Area Measurement Systems. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Energy, 2007.
  • [22] Deng Y, Lin H, Phadke AG, Shukla S, Thorp JS , Mili L. Communication network modeling and simulation for wide area measurement applications. In: IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies; 16–20 January 2012; Washington, DC, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [23] Sridhar S, Hahn A, Govindarasu M. Cyber–physical system security for the electric power grid. P IEEE 2012; 100: 210-224.
  • [24] Zhang Y, Larsson M, Pal B, Thornhill NF. Simulation approach to reliability analysis of WAMPAC system. In: IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference; 18–20 February 2015; Washington, DC, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [25] Mo Y, Kim T, Brancik K. Cyber–physical security of a smart grid infrastructure. P IEEE 2012; 100: 195-209.
  • [26] Heng L, Makela JJ, Dominguez-Garcia AD, Bobba RB, Sanders WH, Gao GX. Reliable GPS-based timing for power systems: a multi-layered multi-receiver architecture. In: IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois; 28 February–1 March 2014; Champaign, IL, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-7.
  • [27] Morris TH, Pan S, Adhikari U. Cyber security recommendations for wide area monitoring, protection, and control systems. In: IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting; 22–26 July 2012; San Diego, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [28] Rihan M, Ahmad M, Beg MS. Vulnerability analysis of wide area measurement system in the smart grid. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy 2013; 4: 1-7.
  • [29] Lin H, Deng Y, Shukla S, Thorp J, Mili L. Cyber security impacts on all-PMU state estimator-a case study on co-simulation platform GECO. In: IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications; 5–8 November 2012; Tainan, Taiwan. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 587-592.
  • [30] Liu Y, Ning P, Reiter MK. False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. ACM T Inform Syst Se 2011; 14: 1-33.
  • [31] Kim TT, Poor HV. Strategic protection against data injection attacks on power grids. IEEE T Smart Grid 2011; 2: 326-333.
  • [32] Baalbergen F, Gibescu M, Sluis L. Modern state estimation methods in power systems. In: IEEE Conference on Power Systems Conference and Exposition; 15–18 March 2009; Seattle, WA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [33] Gou B, Abur A. A direct numerical method for observability analysis. IEEE T Power Syst 2000; 15: 625-630.
  • [34] Manousakis NM, Korres GN, Georgilakis PS. Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies. IEEE T Power Syst 2012; 27: 1070-1077.
  • [35] Gou B. Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement. IEEE T Power Syst 2008; 23: 1099-11104.
  • [36] Mousavian S, Valenzuela J, Wang J. A probabilistic risk mitigation model for cyber-attacks to PMU networks. IEEE T Power Syst 2015; 30: 156-165.
  • [37] Sodhi R, Srivastava S, Singh S. Optimal PMU placement to ensure system observability under contingencies. In: IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting; 26–30 July 2009; Calgary, Canada. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-6.
  • [38] Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C. Introduction to algorithms. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2009.
  • [39] Kleinberg J, Tardos E. Algorithm Design. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson Education, 2006.
  • [40] Gou B, Kavasseri RG. Unified PMU placement for observability and bad data detection in state estimation. IEEE T Power Syst 2014; 29: 2573-2580.