Performance improvement speed control of IPMSM drive based on nonlinear current control

Performance improvement speed control of IPMSM drive based on nonlinear current control

Recently model predictive control (MPC) scheme emerges as an efficient current control technique for dynamic performance of motor drives. For excellent dynamic performance, maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) control technique is utilized to achieve maximum torque while using minimum current constrain in contrast to conventional qaxis current control. Model predictive current control (MPCC) scheme alongside MTPA control is employed to replace the traditional constant gain proportional-integral (PI) current control and a nonlinear hysteresis current (HC) control schemes. The PI and hysteresis current controller offers satisfactory performance at ideal conditions but, with variable speed and load conditions, these control schemes cause high current harmonics, high torque ripples, and reduces the speed tracking performance. Therefore, MPCC is proposed to increase the performance of motor drive and reduces the current harmonics and torque ripple at varying load conditions. The proposed design is modeled in Matlab (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA), and the results are compared with the traditional speed control schemes to verify the effectiveness. The simulation result shows that the MPCC for IPMSM offers high dynamic performance with reduced steady-state error under variable load conditions compared to conventional control scheme. With MPCC, the overall performance of IPMSM is improved and show robustness.

___

  • [1] Nam K. Permanent magnet AC motors. In: Handbook of AC motor control and electric vehicle applications, New York: CRC Press, 2010, pp. 167-191.
  • [2] Lei M, Sanada M, Morimoto S, Takeda Y. Advantages of IPMSM with adjustable PM armature flux linkage in efficiency improvement and operating range extension. Proceedings of the Power Conversion Conference-Osaka 2002 (Cat. No.02TH8579), Osaka, Japan 2002; 1: 136-141. doi: 10.1109/PCC.2002.998536
  • [3] Uddin MH, Radwan TS, Rahman MA. Performance of interior permanent magnet motor drive over wide speed range.IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 2002; 17(1): 79-84. doi: 10.1109/60.986441
  • [4] Sneyers B, Novotny DW, Lipo T. A.Field-weakening in buried permanent magnet AC motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 1985; IA-21: 398-407. doi: 10.1109/TIA.1985.349661.
  • [5] Halder S, Agarwal P, Srivastava SP. Comparative analysis of MTPA and ZDAC control in PMSM drive. Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), New Delhi; 2015. pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443809
  • [6] Castellan S, Sulligoi G, Tessarolo A. Comparative performance analysis of VSI and CSI supply solutions for high power multi-phase synchronous motor drives. 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, Ischia; 2008. pp. 854-859. doi: 10.1109/SPEEDHAM.2008.4581250
  • [7] Rebeiro RS, Uddin MH. Performance analysis of an FLC-based online adaptation of both hysteresis and PI controllers for IPMSM drive. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2012; 48 (1): 12-19. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2011.2175876
  • [8] Huang W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Sun G . Accurate torque control of interior permanent magnet synchronous machine. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 2014; 29 (1): 29-37. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2013.2290868
  • [9] Ogbuka C, Nwosu C, Agu M. A high performance hysteresis current control of a permanent magnet synchronous motor drive. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2017; 25: 1-14. doi: 10.3906/elk1505-160
  • [10] Butt C, Hoque MA, Rahman MA M. Simplified fuzzy-logic-based MTPA speed control of IPMSM Drive. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2004; 40 (6): 1529-1535. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2004.836312
  • [11] Nalepa R, Orlowska-Kowalska, T. Optimum trajectory control of the current vector of a nonsalient-pole PMSM in the field-weakening region. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2012; 59: 2867-2876.
  • [12] Morimoto S, Sanada, M, Takeda, Y. Wide-speed operation of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors with high-performance current regulator. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 1994; 30: 920-926. doi: 10.1109/28.297908.
  • [13] Kim S, Yoon Y, Sul S, Ide K. Maximum torque per armature (MPTA) control of an IPM machine based on signal injection considering inductance saturation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2013; 28 (1): 488-497. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2195203.
  • [14] Vindel D, Haghbin S, Rabiei A, Carlson O, Ghorbani R. Field-oriented control of a PMSM drive system using the dSPACE controller. IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference, Greenville, SC; 2012. pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/IEVC.2012.6183206.
  • [15] Nam K . Sensorless control of IPMSM. In: Handbook of AC motor control and electric vehicle applications, New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 2010, pp. 229-268.
  • [16] Cortes P, Kazmierkowski MP, Kennel RM, Quevedo DE, Rodriguez J. Predictive control in power electronics and drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2008; 55 (12): 4312-4324. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2007480
  • [17] Fuentes EJ, Silva CA, Yuz JI. Predictive speed control of a two-mass system driven by a permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2012; 5 9(7): 2840-2848. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2011.2158767
  • [18] Usama M, Jaehong K. Vector control algorithm based on different current control switching techniques for ac motor drives. E3S Web of Conferences 2020; 152: 03009. doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015203009
  • [19] Bolognani S, Bolognani S, Pereti L, Zigliotto M. Design and implementation of model predictive control for electrical motor drives. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronic 2009; 56 (6): 1925-1936. doi:10.1109/TIE.2008.2007547
  • [20] Hammoud I, Hentzelt S, Oehlschlaegel T, Kennel R. Computationally efficient finite-set model predictive current control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motors with model-based online inductance estimation. 2019 IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy 2019; 290-295, doi: 10.1109/CPERE45374.2019.8980058.
  • [21] Vazquez S, Aguilera RP, Pablo JP, Agelidis VG. Model predictive control for single-phase npc converters based on optimal switching sequences. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronic 2016; 63: 7533-7541. doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2594227
  • [22] Kakosimos P, Abu-Rub H. Predictive Speed Control with Short Prediction Horizon for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives. IEEE Transaction Power Electronics 2018; 33: 2740–2750.
  • [23] Preindl M, Bolognani S. Model predictive direct speed control with finite control set of PMSM drive systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2013; 28(2): 1007-1015. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2204277
  • [24] Zhang Y, Huang L, Xu D, Liu J, Jin J. Performance evaluation of two-vector-based model predictive current control of PMSM drives. Chinese Journal Electrical Engineering 2018; 4: 65-81.
  • [25] Nam K. Rotating Field Theory. Handbook of AC motor control and electric vehicle applications. New York: CRC Press, 2010 pp. 33-51.
  • [26] Amornwongpeeti S, Kiselychnyk O,Wang J, Shah N, Soumelidis M. Speed control of IPMSM motor drives using model reference adaptive technique. 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Sapporo; 2017. pp. 672-675. doi: 10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988515
  • [27] Li Z, L Hi. MTPA control of PMSM system considering saturation and cross-coupling. 2012. In: 15th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS); Sapporo, Japan; 2012. pp. 1-5.
  • [28] Garin. S, and Nasir UM. Harmonic Injection-based adaptive control of IPMSM motor drive for reduced motor current THD. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2017; 53 (1): 483-491. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2603145
  • [29] Gmati B, El Khil S, Slama-Belkhodja I. Improved MPC for PMSM drives to reduce switching losses. 2017 International Conference on Green Energy Conversion Systems (GECS), Hammame, pp.1-8.
  • [30] Akter, MP et al. Stability and performance investigations of model predictive controlled active-front-end (AFE) rectifiers for energy storage systems. Journal of Power Electronics 2015; 15 (1): pp. 202-215. doi: 10.6113/JPE. 2015.15.1.202.
  • [31] Rodriquez J, Cortes P. Predictive control of a three-phase inverter. In: Handbook of Predictive Control of Power Converter and Electrical Drives, United Kingdom: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2012, pp. 43-63.
  • [32] Palais RS, Palais RA. Differential equations, mechanics, and computation. USA: American Mathematical Society, 2009.
  • [33] Usama M, Jaehong K. Simplified model predicted current control method for speed control of non-silent permanent magnet synchronous motors. In: 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan; 2020. pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/iCoMET48670.2020.9073884
  • [34] Nam K. Pulse-Width Modulation and Inverter. In: Handbook of AC Motor Control and Electric Vehicle Applications, New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 2010, pp. 269-293.
  • [35] Zhang Y, Xu D, Liu J, Gao S, Xu W. Performance improvement of model-predictive current control of permanent magnet synchronous motor drives. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2017; 53(4): 3683-3695.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Comparative review of disk type and unconventional transverse flux machines: performance analysis

Emin YILDIRIZ, Erhan TUNCEL

Field-programmable gate array (FPGA) hardware design and implementation of a new area efficient elliptic curve crypto-processor

Muhammad KASHIF, İhsan ÇİÇEK

Area-delay efficient Radix-4 8×8 Booth multiplier for DSP applications

Subodh K. SINGHAL, Sujit K. PATEL, Anurag MAHAJAN, Gaurav SAXENA

Classification of neonatal jaundice in mobile application with noninvasive image processing methods

Uğurhan KUTBAY, Kubilay AYTURAN, Anıl AKYEL, Mustafa AYDIN, Fırat HARDALAÇ, Atika ÇAĞLAR, Bo HAi, Fatih MERT

A novel hybrid decision-based filter and universal edge-based logical smoothing add-on to remove impulsive noise

Bharat GARG, Rajanbir Singh GHUMAAN, Prateek Jeet Singh SOHI, Nikhil SHARMA

Zero knowledge based data deduplication using in-line Block Matching protocol for secure cloud storage

Muneeswaran KARUPPIAH, Vivekrabinson KANAGAMANI

Legendre-wavelet embedded NeuroFuzzy feedback linearization based control scheme for PHEVs charging station in a microgrid

Laiq KHAN, Saghir AHMAD, Shafaat ULLAH, Muhammad AWAIS, Sidra MUMTAZ, Rabiah BADAR

Wavelet-based super resolution using pansharpened multispectral images

Vildan ATALAY AYDIN, Hassan FOROOSH

Bagging ensemble for deep learning based gender recognition using test-time augmentation on large-scale datasets

Taner DANIŞMAN

Clustering ensemble selection based on the extended Jaccard measure

Hajar KHALILI, Mohsen RABBANI, Ebrahim AKBARI