Online monitoring and accident diagnosis aid system for the Nur Nuclear Research Reactor

Online monitoring and accident diagnosis aid system for the Nur Nuclear Research Reactor

This paper deals with the design of a computerized monitoring and diagnosis aid system (CMDAS) for the Nur Nuclear Research Reactor based on real-time plant-specific safety parameters. The CMDAS carries out early detection and identification of accidents that might affect this reactor using supervised neural networks. The graphical programming language LabVIEW is used for creating a human operator interface, networking, embedding the diagnosis procedure, and handling and storing the data. The methodology presented in this paper can be adapted for any nuclear research reactor.

___

  • [1] IAEA. IAEA-TECDOC-1625. Research Reactor Modernization and Refurbishment. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 2009.
  • [2] Ahn K, Park S. Development of a risk-informed accident diagnosis and prognosis system to support severe plant. Prog Nucl Energ 2003; 43: 397-404.
  • [3] Park SY, Ahn K. SAMEX: A severe accident management support expert. Ann Nucl Energy 2010; 37: 1067-1075.
  • [4] Nabeshima K, Suzudo T, Seker S, Ayaz E, Barutcu B, Torkcan E, Ohno T, Kudo K. On-line neuro-expert monitoring system for BORSSELE nuclear power accident management. Nucl Eng Des 2009; 239: 2119-2133.
  • [5] Varde PV, Sankar S, Verma AK. An operator support system for research reactor operations and fault diagnosis through a connectionist framework and PSA based knowledge based systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 1998; 60: 53-69.
  • [6] Meftah B, Zidi T, Bousbia-Salah A. Neutron flux optimization in irradiation channels at Nur research reactor. Ann Nucl Energy 2006; 33: 1164-1175.
  • [7] IAEA. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, N◦ NP-T-1.1. On-Line Monitoring for Improving Performance of Nuclear Power Plants. Part 1: Instrument Channel Monitoring. Vienna. Austria: IAEA, 2008.
  • [8] IAEA. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, N◦ NP-T-1.2. On-Line Monitoring for Improving Performance of Nuclear Power Plants. Part 2: Process and Component Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 2008.
  • [9] Kim KD, Rizwan-uddin. A web-based nuclear simulator using RELAP5 and LabVIEW. Nucl Eng Des 2007; 237: 1185-1194.
  • [10] Xiang L, Yang Z, Shujuan W, Guofu Z. A method for analog circuits fault diagnosis by neural network and virtual instruments. In: 3rd International Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications; 28–29 May 2011; Wuhan, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-5.
  • [11] Fletcher CD, Schultz RR. RELAP5/MOD3 Code Manual: User’s Guidelines. Idaho Falls, ID, USA: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 1995.
  • [12] Woodruff WL, Smith RS. A Users Guide for the ANL Version of the Paret Code. Argonne, IL, USA: Argonne National Laboratory, 2001.
  • [13] Uhrig RE, Hires JW. Computational intelligence in nuclear engineering. Nucl Eng Technol 2005; 37: 127-138.
  • [14] Ayaz E. Component-wide and plant-wide monitoring by neural networks for Borssele nuclear power plant. Energ Convers Manage 2008; 49: 3721-3728.
  • [15] Patan K, Witczak M, Korbicz J. Towards robustness in neural networks based fault diagnosis. Int J Appl Math Comp 2008; 18: 443-454.
  • [16] Mo K, Lee SJ, Seong PH. A dynamic neural network aggregation model for transient diagnosis in nuclear power plants. Prog Nucl Energ 2007; 49: 262-272.
  • [17] Huimei Y, Zongying C. Design and implementation of intelligent fault diagnosis system. In: 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering; 26–28 December 2009; Nanjing, China. New York, NY, USA:IEEE. pp. 2296-2299.
  • [18] Santosh TV, Vinod G, Babar AK, Kushwaha HS, Venkat Raj V. Symptom based diagnostic system for nuclear power plant operations using artificial neural networks. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2003; 82: 33-40.
  • [19] Santosh TV, Srivastava A, Sanyasi Rao VVS, Ghosh AK, Kushwaha HS. Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 2009; 94: 759-762.
  • [20] Niehaus F. Use of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) for nuclear installations. Safety Sci 2002; 40: 153-176.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK