On the performance of newsworthy meta-heuristic algorithms based on point of view fuzzy modelling

Heuristic algorithms are used for optimizing a large diversity of engineering problems. In this study, the performance of six commonly used and cited meta-heuristic algorithms (MhAs) is compared based on point of view fuzzy modelling. In this study, the simplest version of MhAs is speci cally used to observe and evaluate their natural optimization performances. For the comparisons, dynamic system modelling using a neuro-fuzzy system (NFS) was studied. Obtained results were evaluated based on commonly used statistical metrics, and then each algorithm was ranked according to these metrics. Based on the computed average ranks, the best MhA among the six MhAs was identi ed, and the effect of MhAs on fuzzy modelling was investigated.

PDF

___

[1] Zheng YJ, Ling HF, Chen SY, Xue JY. A hybrid neuro-fuzzy network based on differential biogeography-based optimization for online population classi cation in earthquakes. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 2015; 23: 1070-1083.
[2] Karaboga D, Kaya E. Training ANFIS by using arti cial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Turk J Electr Eng & Comp Sci 2017; 25: 1669-1679.
[3] Kennedy J. Stereotyping: improving particle swarm performance with cluster analysis. In: 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation; 16{19 July 2000; La Jolla, CA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1507-1512.
[4] Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution { a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 1997; 11: 341-359.
[5] Abidin D. Genetic algorithm and differential evolution algorithm compared on a novel application domain. Trakya University Journal of Engineering Sciences 2016; 17: 11-22.
[6] Karaboga D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report, Erciyes University, Kayseri Turkey, 2005.
[7] Akay B. Performance analysis of arti cial bee colony algorithm on numerical optimization problems. PhD, Erciyes University, Kayseri Turkey, 2009 (thesis in Turkish with an abstract in English).
[8] Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C. Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by impe- rialistic competition. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation; 25{28 September 2007; Singapore, Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 4661-4667.
[9] Simon D. Biogeography-Based Optimization. IEEE T Evolut Comput 2008; 12: 702-713.
[10] Rajabioun R. Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 2011; 11: 5508-5518.
[11] Narendra KS, Parthasarathy K. Identi cation and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE T Neural Netwo 1990; 1: 4-27.
[12] Babuska R. Fuzzy Modeling for Control. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998.
[13] Oussar Y, Rivals I, Dreyfus L. Training wavelet networks for nonlinear dynamic input output modeling. Neurocom- puting 1998; 20: 173-188.
[14] Sastry PS, Santharam G, Unnikrishnan KP. Memory neuron networks for identi cation and control of dynamical systems. IEEE T Neural Netwo 1994; 5: 306-319.
[15] Karakuzu C, Karakaya F, Cavuslu MA. FPGA implementation of neuro-fuzzy system with improved PSO learning. Neural Networks 2016; 79: 128-140.
[16] Jang J-SR. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb 1993; 23: 665-685.
[17] Nobile MS, Pasi G, Cazzaniga P, Besozzi D, Colombo R, Mauri G. Proactive particles in swarm optimization: a self- tuning algorithm based on fuzzy logic. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE); 2{5 Aug 2015; _ Istanbul, Turkey. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.