On a yearly basis prediction of soil water content utilizing sar data: a machine learning and feature selection approach

Soil water content (SWC) performs an important role in many areas including agriculture, drought cases, usage of water resources, hydrology, crop diseases and aerology. However, the measurement of the SWC over large terrains with standard computational techniques is very hard. In order to overcome this situation, remote sensing tools are preferred, which can produce much more successful results in less time than standard calculation techniques. Among all remote sensing tools, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has a significant impact on determining SWC over large terrains. The main objective of this study is to predict SWC on a yearly basis over the vegetation-covered terrains with the aid of different machine learning techniques and SAR based Radarsat-2 data, which obtained in 2015 and 2016 years.The proposed system consists of several stages, respectively. In the feature extraction stage, the backscatter coefficients of different polarizations and the parameters obtained from different models of decomposition (Freeman-Durden and H/A/ α ) were combined and nine polarimetric features were formed for each sample point. In the next stage, support vector regression (SVR), generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were employed for the prediction of SWC. In the last stage, a machine learning based feature selection was implemented to the obtained feature vectors for determining optimal feature sets. Finally, a feature set with 6 parameters was determined as most optimal feature set over the SWC prediction and a slightly better performance was observed thanks to this feature set compared to the other results.

PDF

___

1] Hajnsek I, Jagdhuber T, Schon H, Papathanassiou KP. Potential of estimating soil moisture under vegetation cover by means of PolSAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2009; 47: 442-454. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009642
[2] Gorrab A, Zribi M, Baghdadi N, Mougenot B, Chabaane Z. Potential of X-band TerraSAR-X and COSMO- SkyMed SAR data for the assessment of physical soil parameters. Remote Sensing 2015; 7 (1): 747-766. doi: 10.3390/rs70100747
[3] Thoma DP, Moran MS, Bryant R, Rahman M, Holifield‐Collins CD et al. Comparison of four models to determine surface soil moisture from C‐band radar imagery in a sparsely vegetated semiarid landscape. Water Resources Research 2006; 42 (1). doi: 10.1029/2004WR003905
[4] Oliver C, Quegan S. Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images. Stevenage, UK: SciTech Publishing, 2004.
[5] He B, Xing M, Bai X. A synergistic methodology for soil moisture estimation in an alpine prairie using radar and optical satellite data. Remote Sensing 2014; 6 (11): 10966-10985. doi: 10.3390/rs61110966
[6] Jagdhuber T, Hajnsek I, Papathanassiou KP. An iterative generalized hybrid decomposition for soil moisture retrieval under vegetation cover using fully polarimetric SAR. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 2014; 8 (8): 3911-3922. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2371468
[7] Baghdadi N, Holah N, Zribi M. Soil moisture estimation using multi-incidence and multi-polarization ASAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2006; 27: 1907-1920. doi: 10.1080/01431160500239032
[8] Xiaodong H, Jinfei W, Jiali S. Adaptive two-component model-based decomposition on soil moisture estimation for c-band Radarsat-2 imagery over wheat fields at early growing stages. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2016; 13: 414-418.
[9] Arii M, Van ZJ, Jakob J, Kim Y. A general characterization for polarimetric scattering from vegetation canopies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2010; 48 (9): 3349-3357. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2046331
[10] Bai X, He B, Li X. Optimum surface roughness to parameterize advanced integral equation model for soil moisture retrieval in prairie area using Radarsat-2 data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2016; 5: 42437-2449. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2501372
[11] Oh Y, Sarabandi K, Ulaby FT. An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1992; 30: 370-381.
[12] Fung AK, Chen KS. An update on the IEM surface backscattering model. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2004; 1: 75-77. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2004.826564
[13] Notarnicola C, Angiulli M, Posa F. Soil moisture retrieval from remotely sensed data: Neural network ap- proach versus Bayesian method. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008; 46: 547-557. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.909951
[14] Zhang X, Chen B, Fan H, Huang J, Zhao H. The potential use of multi-band SAR data for soil moisture retrieval over bare agricultural areas: Hebei, China. Remote Sensing 2016; 8: 7. doi: 10.3390/rs8010007
[15] Pasolli L, Notarnicola C, Bruzzone L. Estimating soil moisture with the support vector regression technique. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2011; 8: 1080-1084. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2011.2156759
[16] Ahmad S, Kalra A, Stephen H. Estimating soil moisture using remote sensing data: A machine learning approach. Advances in Water Resources 2010; 33: 69-80. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.10.008
[17] Pasolli L, Notarnicola C, Bruzzone L, Bertoldi G, Chiesa SD et al. Polarimetric RADARSAT-2 imagery for soil moisture retrieval in alpine areas. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2011; 37: 535-547.doi:10.5589/m11-065
[18] Said S, Kothyari UC,Arora M K. ANN-based soil moisture retrieval over bare and vegetated areas using ERS-2 SAR data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2008; 13 (6): 461-475. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699
[19] Zhang X, Chen B, Fan H, Huang J, Zhao H. The potential use of multi-band SAR data for soil moisture retrieval over bare agricultural areas: Hebei, China. Remote Sensing 2016; 8 (1): 7. doi: 10.3390/rs8010007
[20] Weimann A. Inverting a microwave backscattering model by the use of a neural network for the estimation of soil moisture. In: Proc IGARSS; Seattle-USA; 1998. pp. 1837-1839.
[21] Paloscia S, Pampaloni P, Pettinato S, Santi E. A comparison of algorithms for retrieving soil moisture from ENVISAT/ASAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2008; 46 (10): 3274-3284. doi: 0.1109/TGRS.2008.920370
[22] Srivastava PK, Han D, Ramirez MR, Islam T. Machine learning techniques for downscaling SMOS satellite soil moisture using MODIS land surface temperature for hydrological application. Water Resources Management 2013; 27 (8): 3127-3144. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0337-9
[23] Xie XM, Xu JW, Zhao JF, Liu S, Wang P. Soil moisture inversion using AMSR-E remote sensing data: An artificial neural network approach. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014; 501: 2073-2076. doi: 10.4028/AMM.501-504.2073
[24] Yadav B, Ch S, Mathur S, Adamowski J. Assessing the suitability of extreme learning machines (ELM) for groundwater level prediction. Journal of Water and Land Development 2017; 32 (1): 103-112.
[25] Liu Y, Mei L, Ooe SK. Prediction of soil moisture based on extreme learning machine for an apple orchard. In: Conference on IEEE Computational Interdisciplinary Science; Shenzhen-China; 2014. pp. 400-404.
[26] Prasad R, Deo RC, Li Y, Maraseni T. Soil moisture forecasting by a hybrid machine learning tech- nique: ELM integrated with ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Geoderma 2018; 330: 136-161. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.035
[27] Marcano-Cedeno A, Quintanilla-Dom J, Cortina-Januchs MG, Andina D. Feature selection using sequential forward selection and classifcation applying artifcial metaplasticity neural network. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; Glendale-USA; 2010. pp. 2845-2850.
[28] Somol P, Pudil P, Kittler J. Fast branch & bound algorithms for optimal feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2004; 26 (7): 900-912. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.28
[29] Pang Z, Zhu D, Chen D, Li L, Shao Y. A computer-aided diagnosis system for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on level set segmentation and ReliefF feature selection. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/450531
[30] Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. A survey on feature selection methods.Computers & Electrical Engineering 2014; 40 (1): 16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024
[31] Xue B, Zhang M, Browne WN, Yao X. A survey on evolutionary computation approaches to feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2016; 20 (4): 606-626. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2504420
[32] Ertuğrul ÖF, Tağluk ME. A fast feature selection approach based on extreme learning machine and coefficient of variation. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 2017; 25 (4): 3409-3420. doi: 10.3906/elk-1606-122
[33] Veci L. Sentinel-1 Toolbox: SAR Basics Tutorial. Paris, FR: ARRAY Systems Computing, Incorporation and European Space Agency, 2015.
[34] Özerdem MS, Acar E, Ekinci R. Soil moisture estimation over vegetated agricultural areas: Tigris Basin, Turkey from Radarsat-2 data by polarimetric decomposition models and a generalized regression neural network. Remote Sensing 2017; 9: 395. doi: 10.3390/rs9040395
[35] Sakshaug SEH. Evaluation of polarimetric SAR decomposition methods for tropical forest analysis. Master Thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway, 2013.
[36] Freeman A, Durden SL. A three-component scattering model for polarimetric SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1998; 36 (3): 963-973. doi: 10.1109/36.673687