Hasan RAZA, Ghalib HUSSAIN, Noor M. KHAN

Low communication parallel distributed adaptive signal processing (LC-PDASP) architecture for processing-ineﬀicient platforms

In this paper, a low communication parallel distributed adaptive signal processing (LC-PDASP) architecture for a group of computationally incapable and inexpensive small platforms is introduced. The proposed architecture is capable of running computationally high adaptive filtering algorithms parallely with minimally low communication overhead. A recursive least square (RLS) adaptive algorithm based on the application of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel estimation is implemented on the proposed LC-PDASP architecture. Complexity and Communication burden of proposed LC-PDASP architecture are compared with that of conventional PDASP architecture. The compar- ative analysis shows that the proposed LC-PDASP architecture exhibits low computational complexity and provides an improvement more than of 85% reduced communication burden than the conventional PDASP architecture. Moreover, the proposed LC-PDASP architecture provides fast convergence performance in terms of mean square error (MSE) than the PDASP architecture.

PDF

___

[1] Estrin D, Girod L, Pottie G, Srivastava M. Instrumenting the world with wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE 2001 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2001. pp. 2033-2036.
[2] Rabbat MG, Nowak RD. Quantized incremental algorithms for distributed optimization. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2005; 23 (4): 798-808.
[3] Cullar D, Estrin D, Strvastava M. Overview of sensor network. Industrial Sensors and Controls in Communication Networks 2004; 37 (8): 41-49.
[4] Predd J, Kulkarni SB, Poor, HV. Distributed learning in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2006; 23 (4): 56-69.
[5] Olfati-Sabe R, Shamma JS. Consensus filters for sensor networks and distributed sensor fusion. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Seville, Spain; 2005. pp. 6698-6703.
[6] Xiao L, Boyd S, Lall S. A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus. In: Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks; Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2005. pp. 63-70.
[7] Olfati-Saber R. Distributed Kalman filter with embedded consensus filters. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Seville, Spain; 2005. pp. 8179-8184.
[8] Lopes CG, Sayed AH. Incremental adaptive strategies over distributed networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2007; 55 (8): 4064-4077.
[9] Sayed AH, Lopes CG. Adaptive processing over distributed networks. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences 2007; 90 (8): 1504-1510.
[10] Sayed AH, Lopes CG. Distributed recursive least-squares strategies over adaptive networks. In: IEEE Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers; Pacific Grove, CA, USA; 2006. pp. 233-237.
[11] Lopes CG, Sayed AH. Distributed adaptive incremental strategies: Formulation and performance analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings; Toulouse, France; 2006. pp. 584-587.
[12] Sayed AH, Lopes CG. Distributed recursive least-squares strategies over adaptive networks. In: IEEE Fortieth 26 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers; Pacic Grove, CA, USA; 2006. pp. 233-237 27
[13] Sayed AH, Lopes CG. Adaptive processing over distributed networks. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of 28 Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences. 2007. 8. pp. 1504-1510.
[14] Khan NM, Raza H. Processing-eﬀicient distributed adaptive RLS filtering for computationally constrained platforms. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2017; 1: 1-7. [15] Sayed AH, Kailath T. A state-space approach to adaptive RLS filtering. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1994; 11 (3): 18-60.
[16] Paleologu C, Benesty J, Ciochina S. A robust variable forgetting factor recursive least-squares algorithm for system identification. IEEE Signal Processing Letter 2008; 15: 597-600.
[17] Yano K, Yoshida S. CDMA non-linear interference canceller with multi-beam reception. In: IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Communications and Signal Processing; Bangkok Thailand; 2005. pp. 6-10.
[18] Raza H, Khan NM. Low complexity linear channel estimation for MIMO communication systems. Wireless Personal Communications 2017; 97: 1-14.
[19] Ahmad I. Validation of PDASP for Quasi-Stationary MIMO channel estimation through processing-ineﬀicient low- cost communication platforms. MS, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2018.