Ghazi REHMAN, Muhammad Obaid ULLAH, Usman ZABIT

Hardware implementation and comparison of displacement retrieval algorithms for a laser diode-based optical feedback interferometric sensor

Optical feedback interferometer (OFI) lasers, also called self-mixing (SM) lasers, have been widely exploredover the last couple of decades due to their low cost, compactness, and self-aligned nature and they provide a very goodsolution for measurements of displacement, vibration, distance, velocity, etc. The SM effect takes place when a part ofthe laser beam is fed back to the active laser cavity after reflecting from the target. The reflected beam interferes withthe emitted beam and hence the optical and spectral characteristics of the laser get changed. To retrieve the vibrationor displacement signal of the target from the SM signal, different postprocessing algorithms have been proposed, suchas the phase unwrapping method (PUM). The first step of the PUM leads to the coarse estimation of the laser phaseand the final step is an iterative joint estimation of 2 parameters, namely laser coupling coefficient C and linewidthenhancement factor α. To make this algorithm applicable for real-time measurements, parallel joint estimation for awide range of C and α values needs to be done. In this research, 3 algorithms, namely PUM, direct fringe unwrapping(DFU), and improved DFU (IDFU) were tested for FPGA implementation by using Verilog HDL (hardware descriptionlanguage) so that more precise and real-time vibration and displacement signals of targets could be extracted from the SMsensor in an embedded systems environment. These algorithms were developed using Verilog HDL for implementationon the Xilinx Spartan-3 Xcs400-FG320 development board. Our designed IDFU algorithm performed 0.492 times betterthan the parallel PUM algorithm in maximum clock frequency and 1.53 and 1.21 times better than the PUM in sliceregisters and LUT utilization of hardware resources, respectively. The designed DFU algorithm can operate 1.355 timesbetter than IDFU in maximum clock frequency and 25.34 and 14.25 times better than IDFU in slice registers and LUTutilization of hardware resources, respectively.

PDF

___

[1] Taimre T, Nikolić M, Bertling K, Lim YL, Bosch T, Rakić AD. Laser feedback interferometry: a tutorial on the self-mixing effect for coherent sensing. Adv Opt Photonics 2015; 7: 570-631.
[2] Donati S. Developing self-mixing interferometry for instrumentation and measurements. Laser Photonics Rev 2012; 6: 393-417.
[3] Siddiqui AA, Zabit U, Bernal OD, Raja G, Bosch T. All analog processing of speckle affected self-mixing interferometric signals. IEEE Sens J 2017; 17: 5892-5899.
[4] Magnani A, Norgia M. Spectral analysis for velocity measurement through self-mixing interferometry. IEEE J Quantum Elect 2013; 49: 765-769.
[5] Khan ZA, Zabit U, Bernal OD, Ullah MO, Bosch T. Adaptive cancellation of parasitic vibrations affecting a selfmixing interferometric laser sensor. IEEE T Instrum Meas 2017; 66: 332-339.
[6] Lu L, Zhang W, Yang B, Zhou J, Gui H, Yu B. Dual-channel self-mixing vibration measurement system in a linear cavity fiber laser. IEEE Sens J 2013; 13: 4387-4392.
[7] Yang Y, Li X, Kou K, Zhang L. Optical accelerometer design based on laser self-mixing interference. In: SPIE 2015 Photonic Instrumentation Engineering II; 11–12 February 2015; San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 93690R-93690R-6.
[8] Bernal OD, Seat HC, Zabit U, Surre F, Bosch T. Robust detection of non-regular interferometric fringes from a self-mixing displacement sensor using bi-wavelet transform. IEEE Sens J 2016; 16: 7903-7910.
[9] Norgia M, Giuliani G, Donati S. Absolute distance measurement with improved accuracy using laser diode selfmixing interferometry in a closed loop. IEEE T Instrum Meas 2007; 56: 1894-1900.
[10] Norgia M, Pesatori A, Rovati L. Self-mixing laser doppler spectra of extracorporeal blood flow: a theoretical and experimental study. IEEE Sens J 2012; 12: 552-557.
[11] Arriaga AL, Bony F, Bosch T. Real-time algorithm for versatile displacement sensors based on self-mixing interferometry. IEEE Sens J 2016; 16: 195-202.
[12] Henry CH. Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 1985; 18: 259-264.
[13] Taimre T, Rakic AD. On the nature of Acket’s characteristic parameter C in semiconductor lasers. Appl Opt 2014; 53: 1001-1006.
[14] Bes C, Plantier G, Bosch T. Displacement measurements using a self-mixing laser diode under moderate feedback. IEEE T Instrum Meas 2006; 55: 1101-1105.
[15] Zabit U, Bosch T, Bony F. Adaptive transition detection algorithm for a self-mixing displacement sensor. IEEE Sens J 2009; 9: 1879-1886.
[16] Zabit U, Bernal O, Bosch T. Time-frequency signal processing for a self-mixing laser sensor for vibration measurement. In: IEEE Sensors 2012; 28–31 October 2012; Taipei, Taiwan. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-4.
[17] Bernal OD, Zabit U, Bosch T. Study of laser feedback phase under self-mixing leading to improved phase unwrapping for vibration sensing. IEEE Sens J 2013; 13: 4962-4971.
[18] Fan Y, Yu Y, Xi J, Chicharo JF. Improving the measurement performance for a self-mixing interferometry-based displacement sensing system. Appl Optics 2011; 50: 5064-5072.
[19] Norgia M, Pesatori A. Fully analog self-mixing laser vibrometer. In: 2011 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference; 10–12 May 2011; Binjiang, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-4.
[20] Magnani A, Pesatori A, Norgia M. Self-mixing vibrometer with real-time digital signal elaboration. Appl Optics 2012; 51: 5318-5325.
[21] Zabit U, Bernal O, Bosch T. Self-mixing sensor for real-time measurement of harmonic and arbitrary displacements. In: 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference; 13–16 May 2012; Graz, Austria. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 754-758.
[22] Li Z, Yu Y, Xi J, Ye H. FPGA-based signal processing in an optical feedback self-mixing interferometry system. In: Photonics Asia 2010; 18–20 October 2010; Beijing, China. pp. 78550M-1-78550M-7.
[23] Sun Y, Yu Y, Fan W, Xi J. FPGA based filter design for self-mixing interferometry signals. In: International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology; 6–9 November 2011; Beijing, China. pp. 819909-1-819909-7.
[24] Lu SJ, Siqueira P, Vijayendra V, Chandrikakutty H, Tessier R. Real-time differential signal phase estimation for space-based systems using FPGAs. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys 2013; 49: 1192-1209.
[25] Wang C. FPGA-based, 4-channel, high-speed phasemeter for heterodyne interferometry. MSc, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA, 2013.
[26] Tartwijk GV, Lenstra D. Semiconductor lasers with optical injection and feedback. Quantum Semicl Opt 1995; 7: 87.
[27] Plantier G, Bes C, Bosch T. Behavioral model of a self-mixing laser diode sensor. IEEE J Quantum Elect 2005; 41: 1157-1167.
[28] Xi J, Yu Y, Chicharo JF, Bosch T. Estimating the parameters of semiconductor lasers based on weak optical feedback self-mixing interferometry. IEEE J Quantum Elect 2005; 41: 1058-1064.
[29] Bernal OD, Zabit U, Bosch TM. Robust method of stabilization of optical feedback regime by using adaptive optics for a self-mixing micro-interferometer laser displacement sensor. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 2015; 21: 336-343.