Fuzzy genetic based dynamic spectrum allocation approach for cognitive radio sensor networks

Fuzzy genetic based dynamic spectrum allocation approach for cognitive radio sensor networks

Cognitive radio sensor network (CRSN) is known as a distributed network of wireless cognitive radio sensor nodes. Such a system senses an event signal and ensures collaborative dynamic communication processes over the spectrum bands. Here the concept of dynamic spectrum access defines the method of reaching progressively to the unused range of spectrum band. As among the essential CRSN user types, the primary user (PU) has the license to access the spectrum band. On the other hand, the secondary user (SU) tries to access the unused spectrum efficiently, by not disturbing the PU. Considering that issue, this study introduces a fuzzy genetic based dynamic spectrum allocation (FGDSA) system for deciding spectrum allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. In detail, the primary objective of the FGDSA system is to increase channel use without causing too much interference to the PU. In order to achieve that, some parameters such as signal interference noise ratio (SINR), bit error rate (BER), available channel bandwidth, SU transmission power, and the SU data rate are used as input variables for the fuzzy based inference mechanism taking place in the FGDSA. After development of the system, a performance analysis was done by comparing some metrics such as channel utilization, signal noise interference ratio, and the channel access delay for fuzzy based inference and the fuzzy genetic based inference that are both performing spectrum allocation. It was observed that the hybrid system of FGDSA outperforms fuzzy system by 2% in channel utilization, by also ensuring 16% less SINR, and 41% less channel access delay. The FGDSA was compared with also some existing spectrum allocation techniques such as edge coloring heuristic (ECH) and clique heuristic algorithm (CHA). It was seen that the FGDSA outperforms both ECH and CHA in average channel utilization, with the rates of 6% and 8%, respectively.

___

  • [1] Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E. Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks 2002; 38 (4): 393-422. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4
  • [2] Zheng J, Jamalipour A. Wireless Sensor Networks: A Networking Perspective. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  • [3] Rashid B, Rehmani MH. Applications of wireless sensor networks for urban areas: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2016; 60: 192-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2015.09.008
  • [4] Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Rehmani MH, Hassan NU. A survey on radio resource allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2015; 17 (2): 888-917. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2401597
  • [5] Bayrakdar ME. Cooperative communication based access technique for sensor networks. International Journal of Electronics 2019; 1: 212-225. doi: 10.1080/00207217.2019.1636313
  • [6] Joshi GP, Nam SY, Kim SW. Cognitive radio wireless sensor networks: Applications, challenges, and research trends. Sensors 2013; 13 (9): 11196-11228. doi: 10.3390/s130911196
  • [7] Cavdar T, Guler E, Sadreddini Z. Instant overbooking framework for cognitive radio networks. Computer Networks 2015; 76: 227-241. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.011
  • [8] Qadir J. Artificial intelligence based cognitive routing for cognitive radio networks. Artificial Intelligence Review 2016; 45 (1): 25-96. doi: 10.1007/s10462-015-9438-6
  • [9] Khan AA, Rehmani MH, Reisslein M. Cognitive radio for smart grids: Survey of architectures, spectrum sensing mechanisms, and networking protocols. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2016; 18 (1): 860-898. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2481722
  • [10] Hernandez C, Salgado C, Lopez H, Rodriguez-Colina E. Multivariable algorithm for dynamic channel selection in cognitive radio networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2015; 2015: 216. doi: 10.1186/s13638-015-0445-8
  • [11] Byun SS, Gil JM. Fair dynamic spectrum allocation using modified game theory for resource-constrained cognitive wireless sensor networks. Symmetry 2017; 9 (5): 73. doi: 10.3390/sym9050073
  • [12] Wang D, Ren P, Du Q. Sun, L. Reciprocally benefited spectrum access scheme with joint power and subcarrier allocation in a software-defined network. IEEE Access 2015; 3: 1248-1259. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2464081
  • [13] Sadreddini Z, Masek P, Cavdar T, Ometov A, Hosek J et al. Dynamic resource sharing in 5g with lsa: Criteria-based management framework. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2018; 1: 1-20. Article ID 7302025. doi: 10.1155/2018/7302025
  • [14] Byun SS, Balasingham I, Liang X. Dynamic spectrum allocation in wireless cognitive sensor networks: Improving fairness and energy efficiency. In: IEEE 2008 68th Vehicular Technology Conference; Calgary, Canada; 2008. pp. 1-5.
  • [15] Zhu J, Jiang D, Ba S, Zhang Y. A game-theoretic power control mechanism based on hidden markov model in cognitive wireless sensor network with imperfect information. Neurocomputing 2017; 220: 76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.03.104
  • [16] Zhang H, Zhang Z, Dai H, Yin R, Chen X. Distributed spectrum-aware clustering in cognitive radio sensor networks. In: IEEE 2011 Global Telecommunications Conference; Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011. pp. 1-6.
  • [17] Kaniezhil R, Chandrasekar C. An efficient spectrum utilization via cognitive radio using a fuzzy logic system for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Science, Engineering and Technology; Tiruchirappalli, India; 2011. pp. 300-307.
  • [18] Qiao JY, Liu J, Wang WD, Zhang YH. Spectrum-driven sleep scheduling algorithm based on reliable theory in cognitive radio sensor networks. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications 2012; 19 (2): 47-72. doi: 10.1016/S1005-8885(11)60445-7
  • [19] Di Felice M, Bedogni L, Bononi L. Reinforcement learning-based spectrum management for cognitive radio networks: A literature review and case study. In: Zhang W (editor). Handbook of Cognitive Radio. USA: Springer, 2018, pp. 1-38. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1389-8_58
  • [20] Xu W, Xu J, Li J, Liu W, Gong S et al. Robust spectrum monitoring in cognitive radio networks with uncertain traffic information. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 34696-34706. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2849726
  • [21] Tekanyi AMS, Raymond J, Usman AD. Optimization of spectrum sensing time in a cooperative cognitive radio. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education 2019; 7 (2): 133-142
  • 22] Khodadadi S, Qiu D, Shayan YR. Performance analysis of secondary users in cognitive radio networks with dynamic spectrum allocation. IEEE Communications Letters 2018; 22 (8): 1684-1687. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2844366
  • [23] Cicioglu M, Bayrakdar, ME, Calhan A. Performance analysis of a New MAC protocol for wireless cognitive radio networks. Wireless Personal Communications 2019; 108 (1): 67-86. doi: 10.1007/s11277-019-06388-w
  • [24] Si P, Yue H, Zhang Y, Fang Y. Spectrum management for proactive video caching in information-centric cognitive radio networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2016; 34 (8): 2247-2259. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2016.2577320
  • [25] Thakur P, Singh G, Satasia SN. Spectrum sharing in cognitive radio communication system using power constraints: A technical review. Perspectives in Science 2016; 8: 651-653. doi: 10.1016/j.pisc.2016.06.048
  • [26] Nandakumar S, Velmurugan T, Thiagarajan U, Karuppiah M, Hassan MM et al. Efficient Spectrum Manage- ment Techniques for Cognitive Radio Networks for Proximity Service. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 43795-43805. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906469
  • [27] Sadreddini Z, Cavdar T. Performance analysis of dynamic spectrum management in cognitive radio networks. In: 2017 Electric Electronics, Computer Science, Biomedical Engineerings’ Meeting (EBBT); Istanbul, Turkey; 2017. pp. 1-4.
  • [28] Chkirbene Z, Hamdi N. A survey on spectrum management in cognitive radio networks. International Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing 2015; 8 (2): 153-165. doi: 10.1504/IJWMC.2015.068618
  • [29] Yager RR, Zadeh LA. An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems (Vol. 165). New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  • [30] Dhimish M, Holmes V, Mehrdadi B, Dales M. Comparing mamdani sugeno fuzzy logic and RBF ANN network for PV fault detection. Renewable Energy 2018; 117: 257-274. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.066
  • [31] Whitley D. A genetic algorithm tutorial. Statistics and Computing 1994; 4 (2): 65-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00175354
  • [32] Kramer O. Genetic Algorithm Essentials (Studies in Computational Intelligence Vol. 679). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2017.
  • [33] MacCrimmon KR. Decision Making among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach (No. RM-4823-ARPA). Santa Monica CA: Rand Corporation, 1968.
  • [34] Alanazi HO, Abdullah AH, Larbani M. Dynamic weighted sum multi-criteria decision making: mathematical model. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention 2013; 1 (2): 16-18.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK