Experimental performance comparison of a 2-axis sun tracking system with fixed system under the climatic conditions of Dzce, Turkey

Experimental performance comparison of a 2-axis sun tracking system with fixed system under the climatic conditions of Dzce, Turkey

In this study, an experimental performance comparison of a 2-axis tracking system with a fixed panel in a solar renewable energy system is conducted. The paper mainly focuses on a cost benefit analysis of fixed and tracking modules. For this aim, an experimental setup was built and periodical measurements were then obtained from the setup. To provide a better comparison, the panels were exposed to the same conditions during the measurements. By considering the real-time experimental results, the paper provides a quantitative analysis of the feasibility of tracking panels for domestic applications as well as an analysis of payback period if a tracking system is used for a home-building application instead of using a conventional fixed module. The study is restricted to the geographical region of D¨uzce, Turkey.

___

  • [1] Goetzberger A, Hoffman VU. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Generation. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
  • [2] Messenger RA, Ventre J. Photovoltaic System Engineering. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2005.
  • [3] Patel MR. Wind and Solar Power Systems. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1999.
  • [4] Stutenbaumer U, Negash T, Abdi A. Performance of small scale photovoltaic systems and their potential for rural electrification in Ethiopia. Renew Energ 1999; 18: 191-204.
  • [5] Tributsch H. Photovoltaic hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008; 33: 5911-5930.
  • [6] Aparnathi R, Dwivedi VV. Maximum power point tracking in PV system with industry applications. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System 2013; 3: 417-423.
  • [7] Singh SN, Singh AK. Optimal design of a cost effective solar home power system – an alternate solution to DG for grid-deprived rural India. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences 2010; 2: 60-66.
  • [8] Swart A, Schoeman R, Pienaar C. Cost-effective energy monitoring of domestic off-grid PV systems. Energy and Power Engineering 2013; 5: 182-188.
  • [9] Khalil AA, El-Singaby M. Position control of sun tracking system. In: IEEE 2003 Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems; 27–30 December 2013; Cairo, Egypt. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1134-1137.
  • [10] Bayod-R´ujula AA, Lorente-Lafuente AM, Cirez-Oto F. Environmental assessment of grid-connected photovoltaic ´ plants with 2-axis tracking versus fixed modules systems. Energy 2011; 36: 3148-3158.
  • [11] Nijegodorov N, Devan KRS, Jain PK, Carlsson S. Atmospheric transmittance models and an analytical method to predict the optimum slope of an absorber plate variously oriented at any latitude. Renew Energ 1994; 4: 529-543.
  • [12] Gunerhan H, Hepbasli A. Determination of the optimum tilt angle of solar collectors for building applications. Build Environ 2007; 79: 249-260.
  • [13] Yakup MABHM, Malik AQ. Optimum tilt angle and orientation for solar collector in Brunei Darussalam. Renew Energ 2001; 24: 223-234.
  • [14] Sharan AM, Prateek M. Automation of minimum torque based accurate solar tracking systems using microprocessors. J Indian I Sci 2006; 86: 415-437.
  • [15] Baz A, Sabry A, Mobarak A, Morcos S. On the tracking error of self-contained solar tracking system. J Sol Energ-T ASME 1984; 106: 416-422.
  • [16] Huynh PT, Cho BH. Design and analysis of a regulated peak-power tracking system. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys 1999; 35: 84-92.
  • [17] Hiyama T, Kouzuma S, Imakubo T. Identification of optimal operating point of PV modules using neural network for real time maximum power tracking control. IEEE T Energy Conver 1995; 10: 360-367.
  • [18] Rustemli S, Dincadam F, Demirtas M. Performance comparison of the sun tracking system and fixed system in the application of heating and lightning. Arab J Sci Eng 2010; 35: 171-183.
  • [19] Kivrak S, Gunduzalp M, Dincer F. Theoretical and experimental performance investigation of a two-axis solar tracker under the climatic condition of Denizli, Turkey. Prz Elektrotechniczn 2012; 2: 332-336.
  • [20] Al-Najjar HMT. Experimental evaluation of the performance of one-axis daily tracking and fixed PV module in Baghdad, Iraq. J Eng 2013; 19: 1145-1157.
  • [21] Serhan M, El-Chaar L. Two axes sun tracking system: comparison with a fixed system. In: EA4EPQ 2010 International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality; 23–25 March 2010; Granada, Spain. Vigo, Spain: EA4EPQ. pp. 1-7.
  • [22] Maatallah T, El Alimi S, Nassrallah SB. Performance modeling and investigation of fixed single and dual-axis tracking photovoltaic panel in Monastir city, Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011; 15: 4053-4066.