Decoupled indirect duty cycle PWM technique with carrier frequency adjustment for a matrix converter

Decoupled indirect duty cycle PWM technique with carrier frequency adjustment for a matrix converter

The conventional sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) and the space vector PWM (SVPWM) switching techniques are widely used for power converters due to their ability to control the harmonic content of the output voltage. The most popular PWM techniques used in matrix converters are direct space vector modulation (DSVM) and indirect space vector modulation (ISVM). Since these techniques are complex and difficult to implement, there is demand for a PWM technique with minimum computation to operate matrix converters continuously. In this paper, decoupled indirect duty cycle (DIDC) PWM technique is proposed for the conventional matrix converter (CMC). This technique eliminates the duty cycle computations required for every switching period. In addition, the carrier frequency adjustment technique (CFAT) is proposed to improve the quality of both output voltages and input currents. A MATLAB{Simulink-based simulation proves the efficiency of the proposed algorithms, and an experimental setup is developed to validate them.

___

  • [1] Venturini M, Alesina A. The generalized transformer: a new bidirectional sinusoidal waveform frequency converter with continuously adjustable input power factor. In: IEEE 1980 Power Electronics Specialist Conference; 16{20 June 1980; Atlanta, GA, USA. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 242-252.
  • [2] Alesina A, Venturini B. Analysis and design of optimum amplitude nine switch direct ac-ac converter. IEEE T Power Electr 1989; 4: 101-112.
  • [3] Holtz J. Pulse width modulation-a survey. In: IEEE 1992 Power Electronics Specialist Conference; 29 June{3 July 1992; Toledo, Spain. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-18.
  • [4] Wang J, Wu B, Xu D, Zargari NR. Phase-shifting transformer-fed multi modular matrix converter operated by a new modulation strategy. IEEE T Ind Electron 2013; 60: 4329-4338.
  • [5] Nguyen TD, Lee HH, Dual three-phase indirect matrix converter with carrier-based PWM method. IEEE T Power Electron 2014; 29: 569-581.
  • [6] Wang J, Wu B, Xu D, Zargari NR. Indirect space-vector based modulation techniques for high-power multi modular matrix converters. IEEE T Ind Electron 2013; 60: 3060-3071.
  • [7] Holtz J, Lotzkat W, Khambadkone A. On continuous control of PWM inverters in the over modulation range including the six-step mode. IEEE T Power Electr 1993; 8: 546-553.
  • [8] Hojabri H, Mokhtari H, Chang L. A generalized technique of modeling, analysis, and control of a matrix converter using SVD. IEEE T Ind Electron 2011; 58: 949-959.
  • [9] Cha HJ, Prasad NE. An approach to reduce common mode voltage in matrix converter. IEEE T Ind Appl 2003; 39: 1151-1159.
  • [10] Damian N, Crescent O. Steady state analysis of a three-phase indirect matrix converter fed 10 HP, 220 V, 50 Hz induction machine for efficient energy generation. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2016; 24: 3877-3897.
  • [11] Rahman K, Iqbal A, Al-Emadi N, Ben-Brahim L. Common mode voltage reduction in a three-to- ve phase matrix converter fed induction motor drive. IET Power Electron 2017; 10: 817-825.
  • [12] Tran QH, Lee HH. A three-vector modulation strategy for indirect matrix converter fed open-end load to reduce common-mode voltage with improved output performance. IEEE T Power Electron 2017; 32: 7904-7915.
  • [13] Padhee V, Sahoo AK, Mohan N. Modulation techniques for enhanced reduction in common-mode voltage and output voltage distortion in indirect matrix converters. IEEE T Power Electron 2017; 32: 8655-8670.
  • [14] Li S, Xia C, Yan Y, Shi T. Space-vector over modulation strategy for ultrasparse matrix converter based on the maximum output voltage vector. IEEE T Power Electron 2017; 32: 5388-5397.
  • [15] Liu S, Wang X, Meng Y, Sun P, Luo H, Wang B. A decoupled control strategy of modular multilevel matrix converter for fractional frequency transmission system. IEEE T Power Deliver 2017; 32: 2111-2121.
  • [16] Blasko V. Analysis of a hybrid PWM based on modi ed space-vector and triangle-comparison method. IEEE T Ind Appl 1997; 33: 756-764.
  • [17] Houldsworth JA, Grant DA. The use of harmonic distortion to increase the output voltage of a three-phase PWM inverter. IEEE T Ind Appl 1984; IA-20: 1224-1228.
  • [18] Holmes DG. The signi cance of zero space vectors placement for carrier-based PWM schemes. IEEE T Ind Electron 1996; 32: 1122-1129.
  • [19] Gytis P, Gytis S. Modi ed control of the matrix converter-based drive for voltage sag impact reduction. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2017; 25: 2243-2260.
  • [20] Wang B, Venkataramanan G. Analytical modeling of semiconductor losses in matrix converters. In: IEEE 2006 Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference; 14{16 August 2006; Shanghai, China. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1-8.
  • [21] Pawel S, Konrad U, Zbigniew F, Krzysztof Z. Comparative study of drive systems using vector-controlled PMSM fed by a matrix converter and a conventional frequency converter. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2016; 24: 1516-1531.
  • [22] Imayavaramban M. Avoiding regeneration with a matrix converter drive. PhD, University of Nottingham, Notting- ham, UK, 2008.
  • [23] Zhou K, Wang D. Relationship between space-vector modulation and three-phase carrier-based PWM: a compre- hensive analysis. IEEE T Ind Electron 2002; 49: 186-196.
  • [24] Trentin A, Empringham L, de Lillo L, Zanchetta P, Wheeler P, Clare J. Experimental efficiency comparison between a direct matrix converter and an indirect matrix converter using both Si IGBTs and SiC mosfets. IEEE T Ind Appl 2016; 52: 4135-4145.
  • [25] Ahmed HF, Cha H, Khan AA. A single-phase buck matrix converter with high-frequency transformer isolation and reduced switch count. IEEE T Ind Electron 2017; 64: 6979-6988.