Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement from posteroanterior radiographs by a curve fitting method

Incorrect determination of the top or end vertebrae of a scoliotic curve causes measurement errors when using the Cobb method. Such problems are due to subjectivity. This study was performed to minimize subjectivity by using a curve fitting method. A digitally scanned posteroanterior radiographic image was used for each patient. User-defined midpoints of the curvature, which indicate the midpoints of the vertebrae, were used to fit the polynomial equation. The locations of the top and end vertebrae were calculated using the first derivative of the fitted polynomial equation to obtain the analytical Cobb angle. The interobserver technical error of measurements was calculated as 1.06 degrees with a reliability coefficient of 1.00. The results indicate that 100% of the variations were not related to measurement error. Small angle variations show that subjectivity was minimized.

PDF

___

[1] Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 1948; 261-275.
[2] Kittleson AC, Lim LW. Measurement of scoliosis. Am J Roentgenol 1970; 108: 775-777.
[3] Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1990; 72: 320-327.
[4] Chockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Giakas G, Cochrane T, Dorgan JC. Computer-assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 353-357.
[5] Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory PB, Silverman FN, Bleck EE. The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1982; 2: 378-382.
[6] Stokes IAF, Aronsson DD. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: 665-670.
[7] Wills BP, Auerbach JD, Zhu X, Caird MS, Horn BD, Flynn JM, Drummond DS, Dormans JP, Ecker ML. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition. Spine 2007; 32: 98-105.
[8] Srinivasalu S, Modi HN, Smehta S, Suh SW, Chen T, Murun T. Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographsintraobserver and interobserver variability. Asian Spine J 2008; 2: 90-93.
[9] Humbert L, De Guise JA, Godbout B, Parent S, Dubousset J, Skalli W. Comparative study of scoliotic spines using a fast 3D reconstruction method from biplanar X-rays. Comput Method Biomec 2008; 11: 117-118.
[10] Zhang J, Lou E, Le LH, Hill DL, Raso JV, Wang Y. Automatic cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough transform with vertebral shape prior. J Digit Imaging 2009; 22: 463-472.
[11] Moura DC, Barbosa JG, Reis AM, Tavares JMRS. A flexible approach for the calibration of biplanar radiography of the spine on conventional radiological systems. Comput Model Eng Sci 2010; 60: 115-138.
[12] Moura DC, Barbosa JG, Tavares JMRS, Reis AM. Calibration of bi-planar radiography with a rangefinder and a small calibration object. Lect Notes Comp Sci 2008; 5358: 572-581.
[13] Moura DC, Boisvert J, Barbosa JG, Labelle H, Tavares JMRS. Fast 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar radiographs using a deformable articulated model. Med Eng Phys 2011; 33: 924-933.
[14] Moura DC, Boisvert J, Barbosa JG, Tavares JMRS. Fast 3D reconstruction of the spine using user-defined splines and a statistical articulated model. Lect Notes Comp Sci 2009; 5875: 586-595.
[15] Mueller WH, Martorell R. Reliability and accuracy of measurement. In: Lochman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics Books, 1988. pp. 83-86.
[16] Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Brit J Nutr 1999; 82: 165-177.