Applying deep learning models to structural MRI for stage prediction of Alzheimer’s disease

Applying deep learning models to structural MRI for stage prediction of Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease is a brain disease that causes impaired cognitive abilities in memory, concentration,planning, and speaking. Alzheimer’s disease is defined as the most common cause of dementia and changes differentparts of the brain. Neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and some protein abnormalities are commonly used as clinicaldiagnostic biomarkers. In this study, neuroimaging biomarkers were applied for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s diseaseand dementia as a noninvasive method. Structural magnetic resonance (MR) brain images were used as input of thepredictive model. T1 weighted volumetric MR images were reduced to two-dimensional space by several preprocessingmethods for three different projections. Convolutional neural network (CNN) models took preprocessed brain images,and the training and testing of the CNN models were carried out with two different data sets. The CNN models achievedaccuracy values around 0.8 for diagnosis of both Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. The experimentalresults revealed that the diagnosis of patients with mild cognitive impairment was more difficult than that of patientswith Alzheimer’s disease. The proposed deep learning-based model might serve as an efficient and practical diagnostictool when MRI data are integrated with other clinical tests.

___

  • [1] Maurer K, Volk S, Gerbaldo H. Auguste D and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1997; 349 (9064): 1546-1549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10203-8
  • [2] Richards SS, Hendrie HC. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a guide for the internist. Archives of Internal Medicine American Medical Association 1999; 159 (8): 789–798. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.8.789
  • [3] Morris JC. Classification of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1996; 94 (S165): 41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb05871.x
  • [4] Jellinger K, Danielczyk W, Fischer P, Gabriel E. Clinicopathological analysis of dementia disorders in the elderly. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1990; 95 (2): 239-258. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(90)90072-U
  • [5] Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MM, de Strooper B, Frisoni GB et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2016; 388 (10043): 505–517. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1
  • [6] O’Brien JT. Role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of dementia. The British Journal of Radiology 2007; 80 (2): 71–77. doi: 10.1259/bjr/33117326
  • [7] Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo JL et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. The Lancet Neurology 2014; 13 (6): 614–629. doi: 10.1016/S1474- 4422(14)70090-0
  • [8] Toews M, Wells W, Collins DL, Arbel T. Feature-based morphometry: discovering group-related anatomical patterns. NeuroImage 2009; 49 (3): 2318-2327. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.032
  • [9] Rueda A, Gonzalez FA, Romero E. Extracting salient brain patterns for imaging-based classification of neurodegenerative diseases. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2014; 33 (6): 1262-1274. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2308999
  • [10] Li T, Zhang W. Classification of brain disease from magnetic resonance images based on multi-level brain partitions. In: 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); Florida, USA; 2016. pp. 5933-5936.
  • [11] Giraldo DL, García‐Arteaga JD, Cárdenas‐Robledo S, Romero E. Characterization of brain anatomical patterns by comparing region intensity distributions: Applications to the description of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Behavior 2018; 8 (4): e00942. doi: 10.1002/brb3.942
  • [12] Liu M, Cheng D, Wang K, Wang Y. Multi-modality cascaded convolutional neural networks for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Neuroinformatics 2018; 16 (3-4): 295-308. doi: 10.1007/s12021-018-9370-4
  • [13] Marcus DS, Wang TH, Parker J, Csernansky JG, Morris JC et al. Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2007; 19 (9): 1498-1507. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498
  • [14] Mugler, JP, Brookeman, JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1990; 15 (1): 152–157. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910150117
  • [15] Malone IB, Cash D, Ridgway GR, MacManus DG, Ourselin S et al. MIRIAD—Public release of a multiple time point Alzheimer’s MR imaging dataset. Neuroimage 2013; 70: 33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.044
  • [16] Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004; 23 (S1): 208-319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
  • [17] Jenkinson M, Pechaud M, Smith S. BET2: MR-based estimation of brain, skull and scalp surfaces. In: Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2005. pp. 167.
  • [18] Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Human Brain Mapping 2002; 17 (3): 143-155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062
  • [19] Zuiderveld K. Contrast limited adaptive histograph equalization. Graphic Gems IV. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press Professional, 1994, pp. 474–485.
  • [20] LeCun Y, Boser BE, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a backpropagation network. In: 2nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Denver, CO, USA; 1990. pp. 396-404.
  • [21] Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; Stateline, NV, USA; 2012. pp. 1097–1105.
  • [22] Zeiler MD, Fergus R. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: 13th European Conference Computer Vision; Zurich, Switzerland; 2014. pp. 818–833.
  • [23] Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S et al. Going deeper with convolutions. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Boston, MA, USA; 2015. pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594.
  • [24] Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In: International Conference on Learning Representations; San Diego, CA, USA; 2015. pp. 1409-1556.
  • [25] He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2016. pp. 770-778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
  • [26] Zhang D, Shen D. Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 2011; 59 (2): 895–907. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.069
  • [27] Ahmed OB, Mizotin M, Benois-Pineau J, Allard M, Catheline G et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis on structural MR images using circular harmonic functions descriptors on hippocampus and posterior cingulate cortex. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2015; 44: 13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.04.007
  • [28] Demirhan A. Classification of structural MRI for detecting Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering 2016; 195-198. doi: 10.18201/ijisae.2016SpecialIssue-146973
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK