A combined approach based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy inference system to rankreviewers in online communities

A combined approach based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy inference system to rankreviewers in online communities

Online product review communities allow users to share their ideas and opinions about various products andservices. Although online reviews as user-generated content can be considered as an invaluable source of information forboth consumers and rms, these reviews tend to be of very different quality. To tackle the problem of low quality reviews,we address reviewer credibility and propose an innovative framework. The framework comprises ve critical phases forranking reviewers in terms of credibility using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy inference system.To determine the weights of the features, a fuzzy AHP method was applied. In addition, according to the proposedframework, to compute a realistic credibility score based on trustworthiness and expertise, a cognitive approach wasfollowed and a fuzzy inference system was designed. To illustrate an application of the proposed method, we conductedan experimental study using real data gathered from Epinions.

___

  • [1]O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O'Reilly Media, 2009.
  • [2]Hsu YC, Ching YH, Grabowski BL. Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In:Spector JM, Merrill MD, Elen J, Bishop MJ, editors. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications andTechnology. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2014. pp. 747-758.
  • [3]Seo D, Lee J. Web2.0 and ve years since: how the combination of technological and organizational initiativesin uences an organization's long-term Web2.0 performance. Telemat Inform 2016; 33: 232-246.
  • [4]Lu Y, Tsaparas P, Ntoulas A, Polanyi L. Exploiting social context for review quality prediction. In: Proceedings ofthe 19th International Conference on World Wide Web; 2010; Raleigh, NC, USA. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp.691-700.
  • [5]Wang Y, Chan S, Ngai G, Leong HV. Quantifying reviewer credibility in online tourism. In: Decker H, Lhotska L,Link S, Basl J, Tjoa A, editors. Database and Expert Systems Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2013. pp.381-395.
  • [6]Abbasimehr H, Tarokh M. Trust prediction in online communities employing neurofuzzy approach. Appl Artif Intell2015; 29: 733-751.
  • [7]Tzeng GH, Huang JJ. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, USA:CRC Press, 2011.[8]Farahmand H, Rashidinejad M, Gharaveici A. A combinatorial approach of real GA & fuzzy to ATC enhancement.Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2007; 15: 77-88.
  • [9]Kahraman C, Onar SC, Oztaysi B. Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int J Comput Int Sys2015; 8: 637-666.
  • [10]Keramati A, Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Moshki H, Afshari-Mofrad M, Maleki-Berneti E. A novel methodology for evalu-ating the risk of CRM projects in fuzzy environment. Neural Comput Appl 2013; 23: 29-53.
  • [11]Provotar AI, Lapko AV, Provotar AA. Fuzzy inference systems and their applications. Cybern Syst Anal 2013; 49:517-525.
  • [12]Tan WK, Chang YC. Credibility assessment model of travel information sources: an exploratory study on travelblogs. In: Law R, Fuchs M, Ricci F, editors. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. Vienna,Austria: Springer, 2011. pp. 457-469.
  • [13]Flanagin AJ, Metzger MJ. Digital media and youth: unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility.In: Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, editors. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.pp. 5-28.
  • [14]Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd ed.London, UK: Springer, 2012.
  • [15]Saaty TL, Peniwati K. Group Decision Making: Drawing Out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburg, PA, USA:RWS Publications, 2013.
  • [16]Javanbarg MB, Scawthorn C, Kiyono J, Shahbodaghkhan B. Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision makingsystems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 2012; 39: 960-966.
  • [17]van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1983; 11: 199-227.
  • [18]Buckley JJ. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1985; 17: 233-247.
  • [19]Chang DY. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 1996; 95: 649-655.
  • [20]DuBois T, Golbeck J, Kleint J, Srinivasan A. Improving recommendation accuracy by clustering social networkswith trust. In: 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems; 22{25 October 2009; New York City, NY, USA.New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 1-8.
  • 21]Ma X, Lu H, Gan Z, Ma Y. Improving recommendation accuracy with clustering-based social regularization.In: Chen L, Jia Y, Sellis T, Liu G, editors. Web Technologies and Applications. Zurich, Switzerland: SpringerInternational Publishing, 2014. p. 177-188.
  • [22]Cho J, Kwon K, Park Y. Q-rater: a collaborative reputation system based on source credibility theory. Expert SystAppl 2009; 36: 3751-3760.
  • [23]Xu G, Zhang Y, Li L. Web Mining and Social Networking: Techniques and Applications. 1st ed. New York, NY,USA: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  • [24]Lee HA, Law R, Murphy J. Helpful reviewers in TripAdvisor, an online travel community. J Travel Tour Mark 2011;28: 675-688.
  • [25]Kahraman C,Oztaysi B, Sar_IU, Turanoglu E. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets.Knowl-Based Syst 2014; 59: 48-57.
  • [26]Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E. Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational Approach to Learning andMachine Intelligence. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1997.
  • [27]Mamdani EH, Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man Mach Stud1975; 7: 1-13.
  • [28]Ylmaz A, Ayan K. Cancer risk analysis by fuzzy logic approach and performance status of the model. Turk J ElecEng & Comp Sci 2013; 21: 897-912.
  • [29]Khooban MH, Nazari D, Abdi M, Al A, Siahi M. Swarm optimization tuned Mamdani fuzzy controller for diabetesdelayed model. Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci 2013; 21: 2110-2126.
  • [30]Camastra F, Ciaramella A, Giovannelli V, Lener M, Rastelli V, Staiano A, Staiano G, Starace A. A fuzzy decisionsystem for genetically modi ed plant environmental risk assessment using Mamdani inference. Expert Syst Appl2015; 42: 1710-1716.
  • [31]Segundo U, Lopez-Cuadrado J, Aldamiz-Echevarria L, Perez TA, Buenestado D, Iruetaguena A, Barrena R, PikatzaJM. Automatic construction of fuzzy inference systems for computerized clinical guidelines and protocols. Appl SoftComput 2015; 26: 257-269.
  • [32]Li Z. Fuzzy Chaotic Systems Modeling, Control, and Applications. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer, 2006.[33]Chen KC, Yeh JH. Applying 2-tuple linguistic representation and a Mamdani fuzzy inference system to fuzzy timeseries. Inform Optim Sci 2014; 35: 231-253.
  • [34]Nelles O. Nonlinear System Identi cation: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. 1sted. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
  • [35]Roychowdhury S, Pedrycz W. A survey of defuzzi cation strategies. Int J Intell Syst 2001; 16: 679-695.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK